Page 3 of 3
Posted: Mon Sep 19, 2005 1:52 am
by rozy
So your problem centers solely on the jerseys part of the discussion... which was a stupid argument but in no way lessens the veracity of the original statement. Which fit perfectly into this thread.
Maybe Pop needs to give a better definition of "face".
Posted: Mon Sep 19, 2005 2:02 am
by Felix
rozy wrote:So your problem centers solely on the jerseys part of the discussion...".
No.....my problem lies in the fact that Jim made a statement about who's number a person is more apt to see at Philly games. For some reason, B thinks he knows more about what jerseys you see at a Philly game than does the guy who attends the games........it's Bri's pattern....but WTF, if you're entertained by these back and forths then so be it.......
Posted: Mon Sep 19, 2005 3:28 am
by rozy
Felix wrote:rozy wrote:So your problem centers solely on the jerseys part of the discussion...".
No.....my problem lies in the fact that Jim made a statement about who's number a person is more apt to see at Philly games. For some reason, B thinks he knows more about what jerseys you see at a Philly game than does the guy who attends the games........it's Bri's pattern....but WTF, if you're entertained by these back and forths then so be it.......
I'm far more entertained.....by the free world realizing the greatness that is #20. Even if Jim's argument did suck gnat testicles.
Posted: Mon Sep 19, 2005 3:39 am
by PrimeX
-Texans fan.
Posted: Mon Sep 19, 2005 3:42 am
by jiminphilly
rozy wrote:Felix wrote:rozy wrote:So your problem centers solely on the jerseys part of the discussion...".
No.....my problem lies in the fact that Jim made a statement about who's number a person is more apt to see at Philly games. For some reason, B thinks he knows more about what jerseys you see at a Philly game than does the guy who attends the games........it's Bri's pattern....but WTF, if you're entertained by these back and forths then so be it.......
I'm far more entertained.....by the free world realizing the greatness that is #20. Even if Jim's argument did suck gnat testicles.
At least we both agree on #20 being the best Safety in the league. That's good enough for me.
Posted: Mon Sep 19, 2005 3:50 am
by BSmack
Felix wrote:rozy wrote:So your problem centers solely on the jerseys part of the discussion...".
No.....my problem lies in the fact that Jim made a statement about who's number a person is more apt to see at Philly games. For some reason, B thinks he knows more about what jerseys you see at a Philly game than does the guy who attends the games........it's Bri's pattern....but WTF, if you're entertained by these back and forths then so be it.......
Not sure if these newfangled things called TV sets have made it out to Idaho. Maybe you haven't heard yet, but thse things can allow you to SEE, amongst other things, fans at sporting events in areas far away from your home. You can even see what numbers are on their "Nest of Death" jerseys.
But hey, if you're entertained by smoke signals and telegraph messages of game scores, so be it.