Page 1 of 1
Hillary tries to appeal to the black masses.
Posted: Tue Jan 17, 2006 2:18 pm
by Cicero
Billary
Easily the most corrupt and self serving person in politics today. Instead of glorifying a great man, she uses the podium to try and help her get the black vote come 2008. The GOP is run like a plantation? Someone needs to take her out.
Posted: Tue Jan 17, 2006 2:23 pm
by BSmack
Her remarks were met with thunderous applause by a mostly black audience at the Canaan Baptist Church of Christ in Harlem.
You were saying?
Posted: Tue Jan 17, 2006 2:51 pm
by Bizzarofelice
Easily the most corrupt and self serving person in politics today
Link?
I mean, the GOP is looking many corruption scandals square in the eye right now. Considering that, and that the energy bill was written by energy lobbyists, how can Hillary be the most corrupt and self-serving?
I'd just like you to think about right-wing talking head rhetoric before rehashing it.
Hillary appealing to the black masses wrote:
If you make $250,000 a year and don't have children, you should vote Republican. All others get on board.
Posted: Tue Jan 17, 2006 3:20 pm
by PSUFAN
So Hillary has the support of the black community. Does that mean anything for her, politically? The Dems have to still be smarting from the lack of voter turnout in '04.
Posted: Tue Jan 17, 2006 6:57 pm
by Wolfman
Is it time to consider renaming the federal holiday--perhaps instead of Martin Luther King Day, it should just be described as Free-Flowing Democratic Invective Day? After a few more vituperative holidays like this, will the Newts and Kemps be forced to apologize to the conservatives who opposed the holiday? After all, it hasn’t exactly been a boon for American racial unity and brotherhood, with Hillary and Al Sharpton exchanging plantation metaphors.
--thanks to NRO
Posted: Wed Jan 18, 2006 1:43 am
by ChargerMike
Schmitt nailed it....
"RNC spokeswoman Tracey Schmitt said: “On a day when Americans are focused on the legacy of Martin Luther King, Hillary Clinton is focused on the legacy of Hillary Clinton.”
Posted: Wed Jan 18, 2006 1:49 am
by BSmack
ChargerMike wrote:Schmitt nailed it....
"RNC spokeswoman Tracey Schmitt said: “On a day when Americans are focused on the legacy of Martin Luther King, Hillary Clinton is focused on the legacy of Hillary Clinton.”
Bull Schmitt
Posted: Wed Jan 18, 2006 2:25 am
by Shlomart Ben Yisrael
ChargerMike wrote:
"RNC spokeswoman Tracey Schmitt said: “On a day when Americans are focused on the legacy of Martin Luther King..."
Oh please...
The RNC is soooo "back-of-the-bus" they're practically
skitching.
Posted: Wed Jan 18, 2006 3:40 am
by Gunslinger
ChargerMike wrote:Schmitt nailed it....
"RNC spokeswoman Tracey Schmitt said: “On a day when Americans are focused on the legacy of Martin Luther King, Hillary Clinton is focused on the legacy of Hillary Clinton.”
Yeh, instead of focusing on MLK Day, this fuck was out looking for others who say stupid fucking shit.
We are all on to your game, go fuck off!
If it was said by a democrat their would be public outrage!
Look you dumbfuck, you are creating the fucking outrage.
Fucking cavemen!
Re: Hillary tries to appeal to the black masses.
Posted: Fri Jan 20, 2006 2:25 pm
by BSmack
Cicero wrote:Billary
Easily the most corrupt and self serving person in politics today. Instead of glorifying a great man, she uses the podium to try and help her get the black vote come 2008. The GOP is run like a plantation? Someone needs to take her out.
What did you think when Newt said the same kind of thing?
Posted: Fri Jan 20, 2006 4:31 pm
by BSmack
mvscal wrote:PSUFAN wrote: The Dems have to still be smarting from the lack of voter turnout in '04.
There was no lack of turnout in 04, dumbfuck.
So turnout in traditionaly Democratic voting blocks was the same as that in traditionaly GOP blocks?
Posted: Fri Jan 20, 2006 5:39 pm
by BSmack
mvscal wrote:Shut the fuck up, moron.
Election Turnout in 2004 Was Highest Since 1968
By Brian Faler
Saturday, January 15, 2005; Page A05
The final numbers are in -- and turnout in the 2004 presidential election, it seems, was a bit more impressive than previously believed.
The Committee for the Study of the American Electorate reported yesterday that more than 122 million people voted in the November election, a number that translates into the highest turnout -- 60.7 percent -- since 1968.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/ar ... Jan14.html
You dodged the question. No surprise.
So turnout in traditionaly Democratic voting blocks was the same as that in traditionaly GOP blocks?
Posted: Fri Jan 20, 2006 7:32 pm
by OCmike
mvscal wrote:Turnout was up across the board.
Sen John F. Kerry (D-Mass.) took 48.3 percent, or 59,028,550 votes. That was about 8 million more than Al Gore won in 2000.
You'll have to find some other lame excuse.
Son of a...that's going to leave a mark. - B_Smack
Posted: Fri Jan 20, 2006 7:37 pm
by Terry in Crapchester
Martyred wrote:ChargerMike wrote:
"RNC spokeswoman Tracey Schmitt said: “On a day when Americans are focused on the legacy of Martin Luther King..."
Oh please...
The RNC is soooo "back-of-the-bus" they're practically
skitching.
The Republican "outrage" at the use of the plantation comparison is so feigned it's pathetic. A look at several prominent Republicans who have made the exact same comparison:
http://mediamatters.org/items/200601190008
Re: Hillary tries to appeal to the black masses.
Posted: Fri Jan 20, 2006 10:18 pm
by Mikey
Cicero wrote: Someone needs to take her out.
Why don't you? I think you'd make a cute couple.
Posted: Fri Jan 20, 2006 10:48 pm
by BSmack
mvscal wrote:Turnout was up across the board.
Sen John F. Kerry (D-Mass.) took 48.3 percent, or 59,028,550 votes. That was about 8 million more than Al Gore won in 2000.
You'll have to find some other lame excuse.
I guess you're just incapable of answering the fucking question, I did not ask wether turnout was up accross the board, I asked wether turnout in core democratic constituencies was the same as that for core GOP constituencies. Your own data would indicate that it was not.
Posted: Fri Jan 20, 2006 11:45 pm
by War Wagon
mvscal wrote:
In short, you morons don't know what the fuck you're doing and there is no sign of any lightbulbs going on and, come November, you're going be scratching your head and wondering what the fuck went wrong...again.
I don't know about this next November. Traditionally, the party not in the White House makes gains during the mid-terms. I'd expect that to some extent in '06.
But in November 2008, if the Dems are stoopid enough to nominate Billary, there will definitely be much head scratching, hair pulling, and gnashing of teeth going on.
Posted: Sat Jan 21, 2006 12:07 am
by Shlomart Ben Yisrael
^^^^^^
Yup.
The wife of the former War Criminal In Chief, and Iraq War Supporter.
Posted: Sat Jan 21, 2006 12:18 am
by Shlomart Ben Yisrael
mvscal wrote:War Wagon wrote: Traditionally, the party not in the White House makes gains during the mid-terms. I'd expect that to some extent in '06.
That's what they said last midterm.
Last midterm, your country's Pampers were still sagging from the assload that was your 9/11
meltdown.