Page 1 of 2

Change of course here: I say, ban her!!

Posted: Sun Apr 16, 2006 5:16 pm
by Van
I've never believed in bannings before (except for when people post personal info or continually spam the board) but this one might've changed my mind...
As if there's any doubt in your mind wrote:If Jamie Bamber massaged your balls, while
Lexington Steele sucked your dick with his dick
between the arch of your feet....

would you never be able to get it up?


If they did it repeatedly, would you always
remain flaccid?
Annie, please, use your talents for Good instead of Evil!!

:blech:

(And therein lies the rub. If there's ONE thing about which Annie is an absolute mensan, it's sex. Giving, receiving, writing about it, you name it, Annie's the horniest woman on the planet and highly skilled to boot. Not a lotta boundaries there, and any inhibitions were long ago left by the roadside. God bless her and other women like her, at least for that...)

But that quote, submitted on Easter Sunday, with the fucking Kings still meekly trying to secure a stupid playoffs berth??
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

Firing squad.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

(I'm kidding of course, but just barely.)

Posted: Sun Apr 16, 2006 5:20 pm
by jtr
Are you talkin' bout the Sac Kings or LA Kings?

Posted: Sun Apr 16, 2006 5:43 pm
by Van
Hockey is barely cricket anymore.

Posted: Sun Apr 16, 2006 5:48 pm
by jtr
I'm suprised they arent in already with Bibby and Artest. Would be kinda funny if they didn't make the playoffs and your WNBA team repeated as champs.

Re: Change of course here: I say, ban her!!

Posted: Sun Apr 16, 2006 5:58 pm
by Risa
Jamie's the most physically beautiful specimen of caucasian
on the planet -- in towel-draped Lee Adama mode.

Lexington has a big dick. He also loves white pussy.

Nishlord made a comment about young people can
be confused by sexual predators.

Why can't older people? Wouldn't that 'Monster' chick
Cherlize Theron played, and her Christina Ricci girlfriend,
be examples of confusion instead of true lesbianism?

Well, take the horror out of the last 2 examples, and make
it just about a man getting his nuts off...

how many of you men would refuse? after repeatedly
being treated like that?

and conversely, how many of you imagine your wives
refusing in a 'perfect female specimen' scenario?

Posted: Sun Apr 16, 2006 6:00 pm
by Van
jtr wrote:I'm suprised they arent in already with Bibby and Artest. Would be kinda funny if they didn't make the playoffs and your WNBA team repeated as champs.
Yeah. Funny. That's the word. A regular fucking riot.

Re: Change of course here: I say, ban her!!

Posted: Sun Apr 16, 2006 6:03 pm
by Van
Risa wrote:...wet blanket...
If contribute you must, do something productive.

Write and submit a (proper) story.

Re: Change of course here: I say, ban her!!

Posted: Sun Apr 16, 2006 6:16 pm
by pron
Risa wrote:Jamie's the most physically beautiful specimen of caucasian
on the planet -- in towel-draped Lee Adama mode.
~~~ thinks to self ........... so who is this Jamie Bamber hottie, never heard of her .................. Google image search ....... WTF??




Fuck you Risa. :x

Posted: Sun Apr 16, 2006 6:23 pm
by The Assassin
RULES GOD DAMIT!

Posted: Sun Apr 16, 2006 6:25 pm
by Van
The Assassin wrote:RULES GOD DAMIT!
Be careful of what you ask for, dude.

~Judging from the context in which Annie mentioned him and then adding in Pron's reaction to his Google search I think it's safe to assume that this "Jamie" shlep is a dude, not a chick.~

Posted: Sun Apr 16, 2006 6:27 pm
by jtr
Rules dont apply to Annie

Posted: Sun Apr 16, 2006 6:29 pm
by The Assassin
Van wrote:
The Assassin wrote:RULES GOD DAMIT!
Be careful of what you ask for, dude.

~Judging from the context in which Annie mentioned him and then adding in Pron's reaction to his Google search I think it's safe to assume that this "Jamie" shlep is a dude, not a chick.~

Yeck,,,nevermind then.

Posted: Sun Apr 16, 2006 6:30 pm
by The Assassin
jtr wrote:Rules dont apply to bitter whiney blacks who dont accept responsibility for their own actions


I agree for once Pugsley.

Posted: Sun Apr 16, 2006 6:34 pm
by jtr
Assasin btw if you are suddenly now a dodger fan, could you switch your avatar to something that says Dodgers? No offense to the traditional blue and white "L A" just these days its easier to confuse it with a Kansas City Royals color scheme and there really should never be such a confusion.

Posted: Sun Apr 16, 2006 6:38 pm
by The Assassin
jtr wrote:Assasin btw if you are suddenly now a dodger fan, could you switch your avatar to something that says Dodgers? No offense to the traditional blue and white "L A" just these days its easier to confuse it with a Kansas City Royals color scheme and there really should never be such a confusion.

Are you a moron? I've been a Dodger fan! Change my avatar for you? Get fucked!


Trust me there is no way the LA will ever be confused with a shit organization like the Royals.

Re: Change of course here: I say, ban her!!

Posted: Sun Apr 16, 2006 7:02 pm
by Risa
pron wrote:
Risa wrote:Jamie's the most physically beautiful specimen of caucasian
on the planet -- in towel-draped Lee Adama mode.
~~~ thinks to self ........... so who is this Jamie Bamber hottie, never heard of her .................. Google image search ....... WTF??




Fuck you Risa. :x
You don't know who Lee Adama is?

If you like Asian chicks, you've got Boomer/Sharon.
If you like White chicks, you've got Starbuck. or 6. or Deanna.
If you like Black Chicks, you've got Anastasia Dualla.
If you like older white chicks, you've got The Prez (well,
former Prez now)
If you like nympho gmilfs, you've got Tigh's wife.

If you like ambiguously asian dudes, you've got Gaeta.
If you like blue eyed Mexicans, mvscal isn't on the show. but
there is 'Stand and Deliver' himself, Bill Adama.
If you like psychotic nympho mad geniuses, you've got Gaius.
If you like big strong silent types, you've got Helo. Who I
guess also counts as native american :? but only in a canadian
telemundo way.
If you like Everyday Everymen who actually hold it down
for everyone else through their on the spot decision making
and humility, you've got Chief.
If you like stern steely cheney/rumsfield types who only show
intelligence when the hard decisions have to be made, you've
got Tigh.

If you like ne.gro men, you're on your own.

but not knowing who lee adama is.... you don't have cable either, i take it?

Posted: Sun Apr 16, 2006 7:21 pm
by Van
jtr wrote:Assasin btw if you are suddenly now a dodger fan, could you switch your avatar to something that says Dodgers? No offense to the traditional blue and white "L A" just these days its easier to confuse it with a Kansas City Royals color scheme and there really should never be such a confusion.
Jess, the Dodgers were there first and his avatar pretty clearly depicts a large fucking block letter "L.A.", not a cursive "K.C.". I'm thinking that as confusing as this conundrum is you can still likely suss it out for yourself...

Posted: Sun Apr 16, 2006 8:09 pm
by Dinsdale
Jess....shut the fuck up. Seriously.

Please tell me YOU didn't just accuse someone else of "suddenly" becoming a fan of a team?

Seems to me that Assassin has been posting about "his" Dodgers since this board started, which would lead me to believe that he's probably posted as a Dodger fan on boards past.

I know this because I read and even occasionally post in the baseball forum. I'll bet most of the regulars there can tell you which team I root for. And I'll bet I can tell you which teams the mojority of the regulars there root for.

And where were YOU through all of this, Jess? Waiting for the whereever-the-fuck-they're-from Angels to clinch the division, so you can THEN chime in with what an OG Angles fan you are?

Shut your hole, Jess.

Posted: Sun Apr 16, 2006 8:10 pm
by jtr
My bad I was just being my stupid ass no thinkin before postin lout.

Carry on

Posted: Sun Apr 16, 2006 8:14 pm
by Risa
Dinsdale wrote:I know this because I read and even occasionally post in the baseball forum. I'll bet most of the regulars there can tell you which team I root for.

Image

Posted: Sun Apr 16, 2006 8:15 pm
by Van
LOL!!!

Posted: Sun Apr 16, 2006 8:18 pm
by jtr
Dinsdale wrote:Jess....shut the fuck up. Seriously.

Please tell me YOU didn't just accuse someone else of "suddenly" becoming a fan of a team?

Seems to me that Assassin has been posting about "his" Dodgers since this board started, which would lead me to believe that he's probably posted as a Dodger fan on boards past.

I know this because I read and even occasionally post in the baseball forum. I'll bet most of the regulars there can tell you which team I root for. And I'll bet I can tell you which teams the mojority of the regulars there root for.

And where were YOU through all of this, Jess? Waiting for the whereever-the-fuck-they're-from Angels to clinch the division, so you can THEN chime in with what an OG Angles fan you are?

Shut your hole, Jess.
Dins,
I called him suddenly dodgers fan cause for the most part his avatar has always dealt with the raiders, I know they were in pasadena for awhile too, but forget anything I post.

I have more than one team I root for dins, mostly because I've lived in three areas of the country all with awesome teams of their own. Boston was my original home and so typically I like the Celtics, Bruins, Red Sox, Patriots and on occasion Boston College. From there I lived in texas where football is king and they pull out a shotgun on ya if you dont claim to be a Cowboys fan, and with that comes being a Spurs fan, a Rangers fan, and a Dallas Stars fan. When I came here it was easy to become an instant Laker fan, Clipper fan, Angels fan, Dodgers fan, Ducks fan, etc.

I dont know what youd call me besides all the other things you're going to call me.

I will kindly shut up now.

Posted: Sun Apr 16, 2006 8:22 pm
by Atomic Punk
jtr wrote:My bad I was just being my stupid ass no thinkin before postin lout.

Carry on
It's okay to not post jess... really.

Posted: Sun Apr 16, 2006 8:32 pm
by jtr
Ok ill stop posting now AP because this thread is too much fun and reminds of the old days on the Smackboard.

Rack you all for the fuck of it!

Posted: Sun Apr 16, 2006 8:33 pm
by Dinsdale
jtr wrote:I dont know what youd call me
There's actually a common name for what you're called --

a bandwagoning, disloyal piece of shit who has no business talking about sports.

Posted: Sun Apr 16, 2006 8:39 pm
by RadioFan
jtr wrote:Spurs fan

Laker fan
Does not compute. Ever.

Posted: Sun Apr 16, 2006 8:49 pm
by Risa
Dinsdale wrote:
jtr wrote:I dont know what youd call me
There's actually a common name for what you're called --

a bandwagoning, disloyal piece of shit who has no business talking about sports.
You couldn't just call him Laker Fan, and leave it at that? :?

Posted: Sun Apr 16, 2006 9:44 pm
by ZigZag
I think someone else in this thread is begging for banning.

Re: Change of course here: I say, ban her!!

Posted: Mon Apr 17, 2006 3:36 am
by jtr
Van wrote:I've never believed in bannings before (except for when people post personal info or continually spam the board) but this one might've changed my mind...
As if there's any doubt in your mind wrote:If Jamie Bamber massaged your balls, while
Lexington Steele sucked your dick with his dick
between the arch of your feet....

would you never be able to get it up?


If they did it repeatedly, would you always
remain flaccid?
Annie, please, use your talents for Good instead of Evil!!

:blech:

(And therein lies the rub. If there's ONE thing about which Annie is an absolute mensan, it's sex. Giving, receiving, writing about it, you name it, Annie's the horniest woman on the planet and highly skilled to boot. Not a lotta boundaries there, and any inhibitions were long ago left by the roadside. God bless her and other women like her, at least for that...)

But that quote, submitted on Easter Sunday, with the fucking Kings still meekly trying to secure a stupid playoffs berth??
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

Firing squad.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

(I'm kidding of course, but just barely.)
theyre in!

Posted: Mon Apr 17, 2006 3:51 am
by Van
Yep, and if they only hadn't blown a 17 point halftime lead against Phoenix the other night they'd be sitting at the 7 spot and looking at a 1st Round match up against a very wounded and weakened Phoenix and a possible 2nd Round match up against either Memphis, the Clippers or Denver. They'd be favored in any of those match ups.

Instead, because of that one shitty second half, they have to hope that a N.O. team playing for nothing goes into L.A. on Wednesday and beats the Lakers, otherwise they get San Antonio in the 1st Round and very possibly Dallas in the unlikely event that they should make it into 2nd Round.

Dayum.

Posted: Mon Apr 17, 2006 4:03 am
by jtr
Whats stupid is all the losing records in the east playoff teams again. Maybe they need a new realignment thats not based on geography. Like the NFL/MLB have American/National conferences and put teams together differently.

What about Stern beasically saying the Sonics are headed out of Seattle? I wonder if he is just trying to put the city on panic mode, even though the contract isnt up until 2009. Or maybe he is desperate to put a team where the All-star game is next year, Vegas.

I if the Kings could win one against the Spurs away from home it could spell an interesting playoffs this year. I know the Spurs look almost unbeatable but it has been a long season for everybody and someone could and probably get injured in the first round.

Posted: Mon Apr 17, 2006 4:25 am
by Diogenes
Van wrote:Yep, and if they only hadn't blown a 17 point halftime lead against Phoenix the other night they'd be sitting at the 7 spot and looking at a 1st Round match up against a very wounded and weakened Phoenix and a possible 2nd Round match up against either Memphis, the Clippers or Denver. They'd be favored in any of those match ups.

Instead, because of that one shitty second half, they have to hope that a N.O. team playing for nothing goes into L.A. on Wednesday and beats the Lakers, otherwise they get San Antonio in the 1st Round and very possibly Dallas in the unlikely event that they should make it into 2nd Round.

Dayum.
Maybe you had better get back to the subject of banning Annie.

Bitch can even dumb down Battlestar Galactica.

Posted: Tue Apr 18, 2006 12:45 pm
by missjo
Risa wrote:
Dinsdale wrote:I know this because I read and even occasionally post in the baseball forum. I'll bet most of the regulars there can tell you which team I root for.

Image
& that my friends is pure Gold!!!

Posted: Wed Apr 19, 2006 3:49 pm
by Terry in Crapchester
jtr wrote:Whats stupid is all the losing records in the east playoff teams again. Maybe they need a new realignment thats not based on geography. Like the NFL/MLB have American/National conferences and put teams together differently.
Damn, Jess, do you know anything about the history of pro sports? If so, you'd realize the difference between the NFL and MLB, on the one hand, and the NBA on the other.

The reason there's a AFC/NFC dichotomy in the NFL is based on history. In 1960, the AFL formed with 8 teams as a rival to the NFL. After several years of raiding each other for talent, competing for the top college talent, etc., the two leagues decided to merge. The actual merger took several seasons, created the Super Bowl, and was finalized in 1970 with the 10 (by that time) AFL teams being absorbed into the NFL, and three teams from the old NFL -- the Cleveland Browns, Pittsburgh Steelers and then-Baltimore Colts -- moving to the AFC to give each conference thirteen teams apiece (of course, there's been some expansion since).

In baseball, the AL and NL are actually separate entities, and always have been. That's why there's a President of the AL and a President of the NL. That's also why you see a DH rule in the AL but not in the NL (both leagues are free to make their own rules). The two leagues do cooperate to some extent for the good of the game, but they maintain their separate identities.

No such historical basis in basketball to justify a similar alignment.

Posted: Thu Apr 20, 2006 7:19 pm
by Terry in Crapchester
Terry in Crapchester wrote:
jtr wrote:Whats stupid is all the losing records in the east playoff teams again. Maybe they need a new realignment thats not based on geography. Like the NFL/MLB have American/National conferences and put teams together differently.
Damn, Jess, do you know anything about the history of pro sports? If so, you'd realize the difference between the NFL and MLB, on the one hand, and the NBA on the other.

The reason there's a AFC/NFC dichotomy in the NFL is based on history. In 1960, the AFL formed with 8 teams as a rival to the NFL. After several years of raiding each other for talent, competing for the top college talent, etc., the two leagues decided to merge. The actual merger took several seasons, created the Super Bowl, and was finalized in 1970 with the 10 (by that time) AFL teams being absorbed into the NFL, and three teams from the old NFL -- the Cleveland Browns, Pittsburgh Steelers and then-Baltimore Colts -- moving to the AFC to give each conference thirteen teams apiece (of course, there's been some expansion since).

In baseball, the AL and NL are actually separate entities, and always have been. That's why there's a President of the AL and a President of the NL. That's also why you see a DH rule in the AL but not in the NL (both leagues are free to make their own rules). The two leagues do cooperate to some extent for the good of the game, but they maintain their separate identities.

No such historical basis in basketball to justify a similar alignment.
Not to mention the following:

1. Realignment based on the relative strength of certain teams at a given time is asinine in the long run. Yeah, you might have a really weak division for a few seasons, but it's cyclical for all teams. It's not going to be that way forever.

2. Only one team in the West that missed the playoffs (Weak Take Lake) had a better record than any team in the East that made the playoffs, and then it was only one team in the East (Milwaukee). http://msn.foxsports.com/nba/standings This is not nearly as egregious a situation as has occurred in years past.

And if it really does bother you, the solution is to reduce the number of teams that qualify for the playoffs rather than realignment. Any sports league that slogs through an 82-game regular season so that most of the teams can still qualify for the postseason anyway is a joke, plain and simple.

Posted: Sun Apr 23, 2006 12:57 pm
by Diogenes
Back to banning IB....

http://www.theoneboard.com/board/viewtopic.php?t=15896


What the fuck is this bitch's problem?

STFU already.

Posted: Mon Apr 24, 2006 2:47 pm
by Terry in Crapchester
Diogenes wrote:Back to banning IB....

http://www.theoneboard.com/board/viewtopic.php?t=15896


What the fuck is this bitch's problem?

STFU already.
If you're going to ban her for that, then in fairness, you should also ban War Wagon for this. Just sayin'.

Posted: Mon Apr 24, 2006 3:39 pm
by Goober McTuber
No way. Whitey Wagon’s good for laughs. Certified smack fodder, that boy. Plus, you smack him and he melts like no other. And that was one instance where he threw up multiple consecutive posts. For Risa, that’s her M.O.

Risa brings nothing. She tards up every thread she posts in. She babbles incessantly, and doesn’t seem to understand half of the blasts she’s hit with. She’s a racist with a tinfoil hat. An absolute mess. I’m not one who generally supports banning, but in her case it’s perfectly justifiable. And it would be for her own good.

Posted: Mon Apr 24, 2006 4:00 pm
by Van
I’m not one who generally supports banning, but in her case it’s perfectly justifiable.
In all seriousness, using precendents, no, it's really not justifiable. I wish it were, actually, but no.
And it would be for her own good.
Exactly.

Posted: Mon Apr 24, 2006 4:14 pm
by Goober McTuber
Fuck precedents. She makes the board unreadable. She’s spamming.