Best unranked team could easily be

The Seer · Post by **The Seer** » Sun Sep 03, 2006 7:42 am

UCLA.

QB Ben Olson 1st start:

25-33, 318yds, 3 TD's, 0 int.

Defense held an Urban Meyer designed offense scoreless in 2nd half.

JayDuck · Post by **JayDuck** » Sun Sep 03, 2006 7:48 am

The Seer wrote:
Defense held an Urban Meyer designed offense scoreless in 2nd half.

Hate to break it to you, but New Mexico accomplished the same feat last season (Yeah, New Mexico, who lost to Portland State tonight)

Utah, sans Urban Meyer, is not anything close to Utah w/ Urban Meyer

M2 · Post by M2 » Sun Sep 03, 2006 7:52 am

JayDuck wrote:
The Seer wrote:
Defense held an Urban Meyer designed offense scoreless in 2nd half.
Hate to break it to you, but New Mexico accomplished the same feat last season (Yeah, New Mexico, who lost to Portland State tonight)

Utah, sans Urban Meyer, is not anything close to Utah w/ Urban Meyer

Utah did beat Georgia Tech(the team ND) barely beat tonight... in a bowl game last year by 4 TD's.

Danimal · Post by **Danimal** » Sun Sep 03, 2006 5:15 pm

Some folks with considerable knowledge, including Phil Steele, thought Utah had the potential to run-the-board. UCLA handled their ass, Bruins deserve props. IMO UCLAhas turned a corner. They aren't a national power but are a legit top25 program.

It wouldn't surprise me if Utah pulls the shirt off of Brian Johnson if this play keeps up.

Vito Corleone · Post by **Vito Corleone** » Sun Sep 03, 2006 5:17 pm

I will give the Bruins their porps. I watched the game and they did look good. Their defense actually came to play something they didn't do last year.

Van · Post by **Van** » Sun Sep 03, 2006 5:22 pm

With UCLA the Eternal Question remains: Can they stand up to a team with a physical running game?

There's UCLA be-all-end-all. They'll always be able to move the ball and score points. They always have great speed at the skill positions and in the defensive backfield.

Will they ever have enough ass to smack a strong, fast and physical offense in the mouth and tell them no, not here, not now, we own these five yards of turf right here and you ain't going anywhere...

The Seer · Post by **The Seer** » Sun Sep 03, 2006 5:40 pm

Van wrote:With UCLA the Eternal Question remains: Can they stand up to a team with a physical running game?

There's UCLA be-all-end-all. They'll always be able to move the ball and score points. They always have great speed at the skill positions and in the defensive backfield.

Will they ever have enough ass to smack a strong, fast and physical offense in the mouth and tell them no, not here, not now, we own these five yards of turf right here and you ain't going anywhere...

This new D-coordinator DeWayne Walker came in with a nice resume. Seems to have changed the attitude on that side of the ball. Helps immensely to get back 3 injured starters on the D-line. I realize it's only 1 friggin game, but they far exceeded my expectations, and Dorrell, who I'm not thrilled with, seems to have good Assts that are running the show......

Van · Post by **Van** » Sun Sep 03, 2006 5:46 pm

We'll see how it plays out when you play ND and USC.

You've had great QBs, receivers, RBs and DBs before but when the opponent's RBs are more physical than your LBs it ends up being a running of the bulls every time your offense has to turn the ball over to your defense...

campinfool · Post by **campinfool** » Sun Sep 03, 2006 6:04 pm

Man those Cal guys never quit. Have to keep them ranked high for their fighting spirit.

M2 · Post by M2 » Sun Sep 03, 2006 6:06 pm

Jsc810 wrote:The best unranked team has to be Cal.

Did you see how they scored that last touchdown against Tenn.? There was less than a minute to go in the game, and the outcome was decided by halftime, and Tenn had their 4th string players in the game, but WOW that was a great touchdown.

Sincerely,
m2ool

So, you're a USC fan this year?

Great, will see ya later this year in LA.

Danimal · Post by **Danimal** » Sun Sep 03, 2006 7:27 pm

The Seer wrote:
Van wrote:With UCLA the Eternal Question remains: Can they stand up to a team with a physical running game?

There's UCLA be-all-end-all. They'll always be able to move the ball and score points. They always have great speed at the skill positions and in the defensive backfield.

Will they ever have enough ass to smack a strong, fast and physical offense in the mouth and tell them no, not here, not now, we own these five yards of turf right here and you ain't going anywhere...

This new D-coordinator DeWayne Walker came in with a nice resume. Seems to have changed the attitude on that side of the ball. Helps immensely to get back 3 injured starters on the D-line. I realize it's only 1 friggin game, but they far exceeded my expectations, and Dorrell, who I'm not thrilled with, seems to have good Assts that are running the show......

A major part of being a head-coach is finding quality staff and facilitiating them doing their jobs. Solich would likely still be at Nebraska if he'd started bringing in staff he(rather than Osborne) wanted and not micro-managing so much before we'd gone down hill rather than after. Maybe after some up's and down's Dorrell has finally put together a staff that can get it done on both sides of the ball.

quacker backer · Post by **quacker backer** » Mon Sep 04, 2006 4:48 am

what did Daniaml just write???
and what was this thread about

all i can say is WOW

Jimmy Medalions · Post by **Jimmy Medalions** » Mon Sep 04, 2006 3:38 pm

They should call him Orrell, because there's no D at ucLabia.

socal · Post by **socal** » Mon Sep 04, 2006 4:10 pm

Jimmy Medalions wrote:They should call him Orrell, because there's no D at ucLabia.

Fuck you Jimmy and the horse you rode in on. Now Seer's going to spend his Labor Day trying to one up you...

The Seer wrote:The should call Pete Carrol 'Ete' because there's no P at SuC...dammit! How in the hell am I going to go with punter smack?

It was a good start for the Bruins, nothing more, nothing less.

Van wrote:Will they ever have enough ass to smack a strong, fast and physical offense in the mouth and tell them no, not here, not now, we own these five yards of turf right here and you ain't going anywhere...

That's it in a nutshell.

Fuck you, too, Van.

Jimmy Medalions · Post by **Jimmy Medalions** » Mon Sep 04, 2006 4:43 pm

I actually think ucLabia will be a better team than a year ago - their record in 2005 was NOT indicitive of the kind of team they had.

socal · Post by **socal** » Mon Sep 04, 2006 4:55 pm

A better team, yes. A better record, probably not.

BTW, nice reloading year. Fucker.

Van · Post by **Van** » Mon Sep 04, 2006 5:34 pm

Socal, keep your Troygoo laden chin up. It's still very early and with all the inexperienced players USC is fielding this year they very easily could turn in a stinker or three before season's end.

One of these years you're going to break the streak. I'm pretty sure...

:-)

SoCalTrjn · Post by **SoCalTrjn** » Mon Sep 04, 2006 8:15 pm

UCLA always has soccer

socal · Post by **socal** » Mon Sep 04, 2006 8:30 pm

Van wrote:Socal, keep your Troygoo laden chin up. It's still very early and with all the inexperienced players USC is fielding this year they very easily could turn in a stinker or three before season's end.

Relax. You're ducking Fresno State this year.

One of these years you're going to break the streak. I'm pretty sure...

:-)

Hope springs eternal. See you on December 2nd, fucker.

SoCalTrjn wrote:UCLA always has soccer

And this sport called basketball.

Sin,

John Wooden

SoCalTrjn · Post by **SoCalTrjn** » Mon Sep 04, 2006 8:36 pm

personally I rank basketball just a step or two behind soccer, which is about as exciting as watching paint dry

Jimmy Medalions · Post by **Jimmy Medalions** » Mon Sep 04, 2006 9:13 pm

socal wrote:
Van wrote:Socal, keep your Troygoo laden chin up. It's still very early and with all the inexperienced players USC is fielding this year they very easily could turn in a stinker or three before season's end.
Relax. You're ducking Fresno State this year.

Maybe instead of Orrell we should just call him Oral. He seems to be giving it to us pretty good these days.

socal · Post by **socal** » Tue Sep 05, 2006 12:17 am

SoCalTrjn wrote:personally I rank just a step or two behind soccer, I like eating old paint chips watching new paint dry

Fixed just because.

:P

To each his own.

Meds wrote:Maybe instead of Orrell we should just call him Oral. He seems to be giving it to us pretty good these days.

Beat him again he's a shoe in at Oral Roberts.

Then again, if UCLA breaks the streak, Petey will be busy for a while.

Van · Post by **Van** » Tue Sep 05, 2006 12:23 am

Petey might very well be collecting SSI before UCLA breaks the streak.

:-)

socal · Post by **socal** » Tue Sep 05, 2006 12:52 am

Van wrote:Petey might very well be collecting SSI before UCLA breaks the streak.

:-)

:ouch:

Try not to overlook Wazoo in Pullman or Kal. We want your dome pristine for the skullfuck.

Van · Post by **Van** » Tue Sep 05, 2006 1:16 am

Hmmm, lessee here...

USC's 2006 schedule

-at Arkansas
-Nebraska
-at Arizona
-at Washington State
-Washington
-Arizona State
-at Oregon State
-at Stanford
-Oregon
-Kalifornia
-Notre Dame
-at UCLA

Nope. The Kal game is at the Coliseum. Meaning, Kal has to play on the road. Meaning, that's a guaranteed victory for us because Kal instantly curls up and queefs as soon as the bus leaves Berkeley.

Also, hey, look! Six home games and...six road games! Just as it's supposed to be! None of this eight homes games and only four roadies nonsense...

The Seer · Post by **The Seer** » Tue Sep 05, 2006 1:41 am

SoCalTrjn wrote:personally I rank basketball just a step or two behind soccer, which is about as exciting as watching paint dry

If you fell down a lot, you'd probably hate walking....

If you are a prematurely, you'd probably hate fuc_ing....

Get the picture?

The Seer · Post by **The Seer** » Tue Sep 05, 2006 1:42 am

Van wrote:Petey might very well be collecting SSI before UCLA breaks the streak.

:-)

Before Suc won 7 in a row, UCLA won 8 in a row....

Shit like that happens.....Get out more often....

SoCalTrjn · Post by **SoCalTrjn** » Tue Sep 05, 2006 1:43 am

any sport where you dont get to hit the guy with the ball, sucks

Van · Post by **Van** » Tue Sep 05, 2006 1:50 am

The Seer wrote:
Van wrote:Petey might very well be collecting SSI before UCLA breaks the streak.

:-)

Before Suc won 7 in a row, UCLA won 8 in a row....

Shit like that happens.....Get out more often....

Yeah, but I didn't know Socal back then. This new streak has taken place entirely on his watch.

Coincidence? I think not.

The Seer · Post by **The Seer** » Tue Sep 05, 2006 1:53 am

Van wrote:
The Seer wrote:
Van wrote:Petey might very well be collecting SSI before UCLA breaks the streak.

:-)

Before Suc won 7 in a row, UCLA won 8 in a row....

Shit like that happens.....Get out more often....
Yeah, but I didn't know Socal back then. This new streak has taken place entirely on his watch.

Coincidence? I think not.

You might be right. She IS a nuisance....

Jimmy Medalions · Post by **Jimmy Medalions** » Tue Sep 05, 2006 8:36 pm

socal wrote:We want your dome pristine for the skullfuck.

Because it will make the beatdown by us more explainable?

:?

T1B

Best unranked team could easily be

Best unranked team could easily be

Re: Best unranked team could easily be

Re: Best unranked team could easily be