Page 1 of 3
Wow. NL = #1 QB, ML = #1 RB and DeSean = #1 WR...
Posted: Mon Sep 25, 2006 6:00 am
by M2
in the Pac-10 right now:
The Revolution is here
This has to be a good sign.
...and the number 1 DB is Hughes with 5 INTs...next best is 2.
Posted: Mon Sep 25, 2006 6:07 am
by Dinsdale
So, Lynch is 124 yards ahead of Johnathan Stewart, and Jackson is 46 yards ahead of Jaison Williams...after playing one more full game than those guys?
Empty-BODE, much?
Posted: Mon Sep 25, 2006 6:13 am
by M2
Dinsdale wrote:So, Lynch is 124 yards ahead of Johnathan Stewart, and Jackson is 46 yards ahead of Jaison Williams...after playing one more full game than those guys?
Empty-BODE, much?
Cal is a monster.
Posted: Mon Sep 25, 2006 6:19 am
by Mr T
Unless this is a fantasy football board....
The only stat that matters is....
3-1
Posted: Mon Sep 25, 2006 6:21 am
by Van
Mr T wrote:Unless this is a fantasy football board....
The only stat that matters is....
0-1, away from Berkeley, just as everybody was expecting.
Yup.
Posted: Mon Sep 25, 2006 2:01 pm
by Shoalzie
Yawn...
Sincerely,
undefeated teams
Posted: Mon Sep 25, 2006 2:08 pm
by Mikey
At this point it looks like you may be playing Nebraska for the MOLNC (Mythical One-Loss National Championship).
Posted: Mon Sep 25, 2006 4:39 pm
by JayDuck
Dinsdale wrote:So, Lynch is 124 yards ahead of Johnathan Stewart, and Jackson is 46 yards ahead of Jaison Williams...after playing one more full game than those guys?
Empty-BODE, much?
Lynch has played 2 games more than Stewart, by the way.
Lynch is the most overrated player in the country also, by the way.
Posted: Mon Sep 25, 2006 6:03 pm
by M2
JayDuck wrote:Dinsdale wrote:So, Lynch is 124 yards ahead of Johnathan Stewart, and Jackson is 46 yards ahead of Jaison Williams...after playing one more full game than those guys?
Empty-BODE, much?
Lynch is the most overrated player in the country also, by the way.
delusional duck fan is back.
NAME CAR YDS YPC TD
Jonathan Stewart 46 315
6.8 4
NAME CAR YDS YPC TD
Marshawn Lynch 62 449
7.2 3
Lynch had a 190 yards rushing against you with 8 in the box, and you say he's overrated?
Enjoy your loss next week to ASU.
Posted: Mon Sep 25, 2006 6:11 pm
by JayDuck
m2 wrote:
Lynch had a 190 yards rushing against you with 8 in the box, and you say he's overrated?
Yes
Enjoy your loss next week to ASU.
Okay
Re: Wow. NL = #1 QB, ML = #1 RB and DeSean = #1 WR...
Posted: Mon Sep 25, 2006 6:15 pm
by MuchoBulls
m2 wrote:...and the number 1 DB is Hughes with 5 INTs...next best is 2.
I don't know where you are finding this, but I know Trae Williams has 4.
Re: Wow. NL = #1 QB, ML = #1 RB and DeSean = #1 WR...
Posted: Mon Sep 25, 2006 6:20 pm
by M2
MuchoBulls wrote:m2 wrote:...and the number 1 DB is Hughes with 5 INTs...next best is 2.
I don't know where you are finding this, but I know Trae Williams has 4.
Ummm, in the link I posted.
We
are talking about the Pac 10 by the way.
Posted: Mon Sep 25, 2006 6:22 pm
by MgoBlue-LightSpecial
Is this really what it comes down to for Pac10Fan? Arguing over rushing statistics?
Do your weekly matchups really bore you that much?
Re: Wow. NL = #1 QB, ML = #1 RB and DeSean = #1 WR...
Posted: Mon Sep 25, 2006 6:26 pm
by Killian
m2 wrote:We are talking about the Pac 10 by the way.
So you have some statistical leaders in a second rate conference that has one great team?
Props, I guess.
Posted: Mon Sep 25, 2006 6:36 pm
by JayDuck
This really is probably the lamest gloat ever posted on the board.
Cal has played 4 games, unlike the rest of the conference.
Oregon has only played 3 games.
UCLA has only played 3 games
Oregon State has only played 3 games.
USC has only played 3 games.
Congratz on having some stat leaders, when half of the conference has only played 75% of the games that you have.
Fucking weak, tool. Even for you.
Posted: Mon Sep 25, 2006 6:40 pm
by Killian
JayDuck wrote:This really is probably the lamest gloat ever posted on the board.
Cal has played 4 games, unlike the rest of the conference.
To be fair, Cal has only
played 3 games also. They didn't get the memo that the season started for them on September 2nd, not 9th.
Posted: Mon Sep 25, 2006 6:43 pm
by GreginPG
JayDuck wrote:This really is probably the lamest gloat ever posted on the board.
Cal has played 4 games, unlike the rest of the conference.
Oregon has only played 3 games.
UCLA has only played 3 games
Oregon State has only played 3 games.
USC has only played 3 games.
Congratz on having some stat leaders, when half of the conference has only played 75% of the games that you have.
Fucking weak, tool. Even for you.
Yeah but that's never stopped her before.
I know you know this.
Posted: Mon Sep 25, 2006 6:46 pm
by M2
Stop crying duck fan...you should have one loss, but you don't. Be happy about that, since the next game you play will be your first loss.
By the way.
Qb ratings and yards per carry have nothing to do with games played.
Posted: Mon Sep 25, 2006 6:52 pm
by GreginPG
m2 wrote:JayDuck wrote:Dinsdale wrote:So, Lynch is 124 yards ahead of Johnathan Stewart, and Jackson is 46 yards ahead of Jaison Williams...after playing one more full game than those guys?
Empty-BODE, much?
Lynch is the most overrated player in the country also, by the way.
delusional duck fan is back.
NAME CAR YDS YPC TD
Jonathan Stewart 46 315
6.8 4
NAME CAR YDS YPC TD
Marshawn Lynch 62 449
7.2 3
Holy SHIT!
Dude is rushing
for nearly 14.5 inches more
per carry!!!!
We are all in awe!
Posted: Mon Sep 25, 2006 6:53 pm
by JayDuck
m2 wrote:Stop crying duck fan...you should have one loss, but you don't. Be happy about that, since the next game you play will be your first loss.
There is nobody on this board that is as consistantly wrong as you are, so that make me feel pretty good about this weekend. I can't wait for you to predict a Cal win over Oregon next week too.
Re: Wow. NL = #1 QB, ML = #1 RB and DeSean = #1 WR...
Posted: Mon Sep 25, 2006 7:18 pm
by MuchoBulls
m2 wrote:MuchoBulls wrote:m2 wrote:...and the number 1 DB is Hughes with 5 INTs...next best is 2.
I don't know where you are finding this, but I know Trae Williams has 4.
Ummm, in the link I posted.
We
are talking about the Pac 10 by the way.
That would explain it
Posted: Mon Sep 25, 2006 8:41 pm
by L45B
mTurd wrote:...you should have one loss, but you don't.
Riiiiight. And Kal
should have zero losses, if it weren't for those
3 plays against Tennessee.
Posted: Mon Sep 25, 2006 8:49 pm
by Van
m2 wrote:Qb ratings and yards per carry have nothing to do with games played.
Really? Then how else are we to arrive at those stats, if not by games played?
Are we to go by haircuts, or nice smiles, or home game scrimmages against Portland St?
Nah. I think we need to go by "games played"...all of 'em.
Posted: Mon Sep 25, 2006 9:43 pm
by Mikey
I hate to break it to you Van but m2's right, assuming he means the number of games played.
Posted: Mon Sep 25, 2006 9:51 pm
by Adelpiero
what a bunch of short sighted twats. neither one of the rb's mentioned have numbers close to these.(ps he had over 200 yards of offense against Ohio st)
garrett wolfe 96 att 828 yards 207.4 per/game 8.6 per carry
this kid is the real deal, he's running against 8 in the box, and dominating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/63e5f/63e5f1d2b13d8134f4679454f32920b7cd126dcb" alt="Image"
Posted: Mon Sep 25, 2006 10:10 pm
by WolverineSteve
^^True. The guy was a beast when UM played him last year.
Posted: Tue Sep 26, 2006 1:33 am
by M2
Mikey wrote:I hate to break it to you Van but m2's right, assuming he means the number of games played.
Don't ever ask Van to understand what everyone else did. He's to busy typing to ever read and comprehend.
Adelpiero wrote:what a bunch of short sighted twats. neither one of the rb's mentioned have numbers close to these.(ps he had over 200 yards of offense against Ohio st)
garrett wolfe 96 att 828 yards 207.4 per/game 8.6 per carry
First we have
MuchoBulls who can't read... now we have Adelpiero.
Amazing.... let me help you out here.
The Pac 10!!!
Posted: Tue Sep 26, 2006 1:39 am
by Van
Mikey, m2, in order for any player to compile stats he must first play in games. So, yeah, games played matters like crazy in terms of YPC and such.
Within those games played are all sorts of factors which skew the stats, least among them being the quality level of the opponent and their effect on your stats.
Sincerely,
Portland St
Posted: Tue Sep 26, 2006 2:36 am
by MgoBlue-LightSpecial
You mean you have to actually play games in order to produce stats?
Sin,
m2's football "career"
Posted: Tue Sep 26, 2006 3:09 am
by M2
Van wrote:Mikey, m2, in order for any player to compile stats he must first play in games. So, yeah, games played matters like crazy in terms of YPC and such.
Within those games played are all sorts of factors which skew the stats, least among them being the quality level of the opponent and their effect on your stats.
Sincerely,
Portland St
Hmmm... Portland State is rated higher than 60% of every Div. I team in the country by the computer. They beat New Mexico by the same amount as Missouri. Missouri has a chance to take the Big 12 north.
That's right...
Portland State is rated by the computer, well above Arkansas(the team $C played)!!!
Would you like to take another angle... Mr. Know it all???
Van, you really don't know shit about football... do you???
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/99d1f/99d1ffcd436e8dfc800a9b8c92c0d1bf3f377acb" alt="Laughing :lol:"
Posted: Tue Sep 26, 2006 3:25 am
by Van
m2, really, just STFU.
"The computer..."???
Yeah.
Portland St isn't even ranked, in either major poll. They couldn't be ranked. Portland St isn't even a D-1A team. Marshawn played against a D-1AA team so yeah,
which games you play has a lot to do with your YPC and any other individual stats.
There isn't a person on this board who'd take Marshawn over Adrian Peterson..and there's a LOT of people here who hate OU.
Posted: Tue Sep 26, 2006 3:31 am
by M2
Van wrote:m2, you're correct...Portland State is ranked above Arkansas on the computer.
Cool...your brain has reached your keyboard.
Posted: Tue Sep 26, 2006 3:38 am
by MgoBlue-LightSpecial
m2,
Smack aside, where's the link to this "computer" that has Arkansas behind Portland St? The only significant computer poll is the BCS, and we all know that hasn't come out yet. And when it does, these teams will have no part in it.
Shit, your boy Jeff Sagarin has Arkansas ahead of Portland St by 19 spots, so you can't play that card.
Posted: Tue Sep 26, 2006 3:54 am
by Van
Obviously m2 has his own 'puter, with his own 'puter rankings.
Posted: Tue Sep 26, 2006 3:55 am
by M2
MgoBlue-LightSpecial wrote:m2,
Smack aside, where's the link to this "computer" that has Arkansas behind Portland St? The only significant computer poll is the BCS, and we all know that hasn't come out yet. And when it does, these teams will have no part in it.
Shit, your boy Jeff Sagarin has Arkansas ahead of Portland St by 19 spots, so you can't play that card.
Look at Sagarin's... ranking of teams, prior to Portland State vs. Cal in week 3. $C had already played Arkansas.
Arkansas(last week) beat a
horrible Alabama team that was ranked the #22 team in the country and almost lost to Hawaii. This is why they may have been bumped up this week.
Like I said.... Portland State beat New Mexico by the same amount as Missouri did. And Missouri has a good chance to take the north in the Big 12. Arkansas will be lucky, not to be last in the SEC.
Posted: Tue Sep 26, 2006 3:58 am
by Van
You played Portland St.
You got bikini waxed by Tennessee.
Win something of some import, in our lifetimes, not Joe Kapp's.
Posted: Tue Sep 26, 2006 4:02 am
by M2
Van wrote:You played Portland St.
You got bikini waxed by Tennessee.
Who the fuck has $C played???
Shit, you only beat
Arizona by 17 and scored only 20 points!
20 points against
Arizona???
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/99d1f/99d1ffcd436e8dfc800a9b8c92c0d1bf3f377acb" alt="Laughing :lol:"
Posted: Tue Sep 26, 2006 4:15 am
by Van
Look, Hump Dumpling...
http://www.usatoday.com/sports/sagarin/fbt06.htm
Your own linked Harris poll shows USC having a higher SOS than Cal.
#9, to Cal's #11.
Bottom line, you played one good team and you went Ned Beatty against 'em. Other than that you played all home games and one of 'em was against a D-1AA team. SOS really doesn't count in your favor when you got blown out in the one game that gave you your decent SOS ranking.
Jeez.
Beyond that, you're still nothing but Cal. You remain the perennial Do Nothing When It Matters team.
You don't
really wanna try to be a Cal Fan who runs smack at
USC, do you??
Cal isn't even UCLA.
Posted: Tue Sep 26, 2006 4:16 am
by MgoBlue-LightSpecial
The only poll that matters...
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/508ce/508cec4e21233ab977e192dce69bb418601c23fe" alt="Image"
Posted: Tue Sep 26, 2006 4:22 am
by Van
:-)
Mgo, bump Marshawn's YPC up a slot and add "Pics I Pulled Off The Web Of C- Carnie 'Hotties' I Never Fucked Anyway"...