Posted: Sun Feb 25, 2007 9:15 pm
But, but, but, they have proof he was resurrected. The bible itself says so, therefore it must be true. Finger of god wrote it, you see.
Perfect. Care to point me to the well-read and accepted authority that suggests HE didn't?Mister Bushice wrote:But, but, but, they have proof he was resurrected. The bible itself says so, therefore it must be true. Finger of god wrote it, you see.
I don'e have a clue who the dude is but he sounds like another U&L resident.Tiny wrote:Who the fuck is James Cameron?
Ohh.....OK.....but really....I ask again.....
Who the fuck is James Cameron?
Careful, Mace...Mace wrote:Yep. Luther claims to have witnessed the scalpings and says that it's true. He also says that he gave J.F. Cooper the whole idea for the novel. I'm waiting to hear back from him on the Resurrection thing. Nothing like an eye witness to history.Truman wrote:Seriously Mace...
Wasn't James Cameron and his family scalped and burned by the 'uron in Last of the Mohicans?
Sin,
Mace
Oh, I don't know, perhaps the trendy yet accepted fact that rising from the dead is rather difficult to do?Truman wrote:Perfect. Care to point me to the well-read and accepted authority that suggests HE didn't?Mister Bushice wrote:But, but, but, they have proof he was resurrected. The bible itself says so, therefore it must be true. Finger of god wrote it, you see.
Exactly. No idea.Mike the Lab Rat wrote:I'm wondering about the alleged "DNA evidence."
Umm........to whom are Cameron and his group comparing the crypt DNA in order to "prove" that the bodies are Jesus, Mary, et al.?
Couldn't be all that difficullt.Mister Bushice wrote:Oh, I don't know, perhaps the trendy yet accepted fact that rising from the dead is rather difficult to do?Truman wrote:Perfect. Care to point me to the well-read and accepted authority that suggests HE didn't?Mister Bushice wrote:But, but, but, they have proof he was resurrected. The bible itself says so, therefore it must be true. Finger of god wrote it, you see.
Believe it or not, I didn't have the kneejerk reaction to this thread that you probably would have anticipated me to have. My first thought upon reading the article was what they were going to compare the DNA to.Mike the Lab Rat wrote:I'm wondering about the alleged "DNA evidence."
I'm not sure Dins would agree to something like that.rozy wrote:My first thought upon reading the article was what they were going to compare the DNA to.
I think you meant to post "insurance disbursements I could collect." I still call Bullshit. MetLife would drop your ass like a hot rock after the first dozen-or-so times.Mister Bushice wrote:Well I wish I had the power to resurrect. Think of the insurance premiums I could accrue.
YOU show me some verifiable documentation that resurrection is something that can occur*.
*Other than reinstating banned posters, that is.
...along with Pestilence, War, Famine, and Death. We've had this discussion before Bushie, and it all boils down to a matter of Faith.And none of this "Prove the opposite" shit. I don't have to prove it DOESN'T occur. I have centuries of human history on my side.
If I planned well, I'd only need 3 or 4.I think you meant to post "insurance disbursements I could collect." I still call Bullshit. MetLife would drop your ass like a hot rock after the first dozen-or-so times.
So, your faith is limited to the intangible - what you've had indoctrinated into your head your entire life and what you read in a book - and the tangible you find hard to accept?along with Pestilence, War, Famine, and Death. We've had this discussion before Bushie, and it all boils down to a matter of Faith.
You have Faith in your Power of Reason, and want tangible proof of the Resurrection...
...And I have Faith in the Resurrection,
and seek tangible proof of your intelligence.
No you won't. the "middle" would require some level of proof on your part, and that is just not possible without blind faith. (no E.C. drops)So I'll meet you in the middle.
OK, Osama bin Truman.Lop off your dome, show me your brain, and I'll happily concede your intelligence.
I have no idea if what Cameron is saying is true or not. But I do know it is the height of logical fallacy to insist that someone provide proof for a negative outcome.Truman wrote:Perfect. Care to point me to the well-read and accepted authority that suggests HE didn't?Mister Bushice wrote:But, but, but, they have proof he was resurrected. The bible itself says so, therefore it must be true. Finger of god wrote it, you see.
I agree a hollywood film is hardly proof of anything but that shallow entertainment makes money, but it's the concept...Mace wrote:Believe it, don't believe it.....doesn't really matter to me, Bushice. The point is that some douchebag from Hollywood isn't going to disprove it in a bogus little film.Mister Bushice wrote:Well I wish I had the power to resurrect. Think of the insurance premiums I could accrue.
But,
YOU show me some verifiable documentation that resurrection is something that can occur*.
And none of this "Prove the opposite" shit. I don't have to prove it DOESN'T occur. I have centuries of human history on my side.
*Other than reinstating banned posters, that is.
The fact is it has only - allegedly - happened just once doesn't play into anyones hands. If it was shown to actually be possible under those circumstances, they might have a case. They don't, it isn't. All that's left is belief for those who want or need to do so.The fact that not everyone "resurrects" kinda plays into the argument of the Christians, IMO......like, that's the whole idea.
Mace
Gold, Jerry.Truman wrote:Perfect. Care to point me to the well-read and accepted authority that suggests HE didn't?Mister Bushice wrote:But, but, but, they have proof he was resurrected. The bible itself says so, therefore it must be true. Finger of god wrote it, you see.
Which were written by his devoted disciples from 30 to as much as 80 years after his death.Tom In VA wrote:(according to the Gospel)
Hilarious.Atomic Punk wrote:Nothing like reading takes from those that do not believe in God. Instead, they mock those that do.
What a fucking pathetic waste of time this thread or any other based on religion is. Those of you going through life with 30 or 40 year long fuses burning up towards your asses... have fun with it.
That soul from the rotting corpse known as Anna Nicole Smith is wishing she didn't lead the life she had right about now. You can't hear her screaming right now.
Can't strippers and whores believe in God and Jesus and get into Heaven? What about Mary Magdelene?Atomic Punk wrote:That soul from the rotting corpse known as Anna Nicole Smith is wishing she didn't lead the life she had right about now. You can't hear her screaming right now.
That's a trick question, I'm only 37.Mister Bushice wrote:Which were written by his devoted disciples from 30 to as much as 80 years after his death.Tom In VA wrote:(according to the Gospel)
How big was that fish you caught when you were 15,Tom? ;)
And what did you have for dinner that night 40 years ago?
She wasn't a whore. Catholic church made that part up.pron wrote:What about Mary Magdelene?
Nope, God said there was to be no sex in the Champagne Room.pron wrote:Can't strippers and whores believe in God and Jesus and get into Heaven? What about Mary Magdelene?
How do you know ?Bizzarofelice wrote:She wasn't a whore.pron wrote:What about Mary Magdelene?
That was before they got plastic on the furniture and "scotch-guard" for the carpets.BSmack wrote:Nope, God said there was to be no sex in the Champagne Room.pron wrote:Can't strippers and whores believe in God and Jesus and get into Heaven? What about Mary Magdelene?
Don't dodge. make it 25 years ago then.Tom In VA wrote:That's a trick question, I'm only 37.Mister Bushice wrote:Which were written by his devoted disciples from 30 to as much as 80 years after his death.Tom In VA wrote:(according to the Gospel)
How big was that fish you caught when you were 15,Tom? ;)
And what did you have for dinner that night 40 years ago?
You're so predictably easy to bait. Go blow up a local STL mosque today (take yer pick between Sunni or Shiite) and we'll call it even.Bizzarofelice wrote: Hilarious.
No, But you could stop dodging me on the memory and fact aspect of this discussion.Tom In VA wrote:So you deny the rare phenomena that people have been considered 'dead' only to awaken ?
Even with today's technology ?
1. I agree time has the ability to distort reality. But it is not a given that it does. Now if you're saying "hindisight is 20.20" you are absolutely correct.Mister Bushice wrote:No, But you could stop dodging me on the memory and fact aspect of this discussion.Tom In VA wrote:So you deny the rare phenomena that people have been considered 'dead' only to awaken ?
Even with today's technology ?
and given the extent of Jesus injuries it is highly unlikely he was a Lazarus Phenomenon.
Whooooah, there Mace. You might just be on to something here. Of course, ol' Luth's form of healing didn't come from the laying of hands. In fact, I heard he once parted the Red Sea...or was it a glass of port, with his "swizzle stick". At that time, his peeps were calling him Moses or something.Mace wrote:I think it's ridiculous for anyone to try pinning paternity of Mary Magdelen's children on Jesus when we know for a fact that Luther was roaming the streets at that time. Cameron needs to get a DNA sample from Luther before airing this film, IMO.....that is, IF he wants to document the facts.
Me too Mace. Although perhaps a slight tweak to the casting:Of course, if Mary Magdelen was a fat, ugly skank, it coulda been someone from the Dinsdale clan that knocked her up. Ridiculous, you say? Yeah, kinda like some Hollywood whackjob coming out with "evidence" and trying to make a few million bucks. Go figure. Personally, I like my story better.
Cut and print.I like it.
Mace