BREAKING NEWS: Ron Paul shot...in intensive care..
Posted: Mon Oct 15, 2007 1:15 am
Ooops. Sorry.
A couple of months early on that one. My bad. Please disregard.
A couple of months early on that one. My bad. Please disregard.
Sordid clambake
https://mail.theoneboard.com/board/
You deserve Romney.BSmack wrote:Paul won't need to be shot. He'll never poll over 20%.
Follow the money. It ain't going to the GOP.Martyred wrote:You deserve Romney.BSmack wrote:Paul won't need to be shot. He'll never poll over 20%.
We haven't even seen "the money" yet. You do realize that campaign donations before Primary's are used by Corporate Power Brokers to buy the best loser as well as pimping the chosen one right?BSmack wrote:Follow the money. It ain't going to the GOP.Martyred wrote:You deserve Romney.BSmack wrote:Paul won't need to be shot. He'll never poll over 20%.
http://www.opensecrets.org/overview/sta ... Cycle=2008Y2K wrote:We haven't even seen "the money" yet. You do realize that campaign donations before Primary's are used by Corporate Power Brokers to buy the best loser as well as pimping the chosen one right?BSmack wrote:Follow the money. It ain't going to the GOP.
oh...nevermind
I forgot about your myopia problem.
Not really. Everybody knows that money buys access. It's been like that since the founding of the republic.Y2K wrote:Like I thought, it was over your head.
If you bothered to actually read a few pages in your link you would have seen how naive and myopic you are. Look at the percentages.
Hmmmmm.....
I wonder why a Strongly GOP or Demo Corporate Donor would spend say 30% towards an opposing party candidate who doesn't represent their interests.....
Deep isn't it.
The guy's I'm shilling for? I see. So you are so dense that you think I'm one of the whopping 0.13% of the US population that donates money to candidates? That's funny. Anytime you want to remove your partisan head out of your ass and grab a clue or two......the guys you're shilling for are getting the 30% instead of the 70% they used to get
Ah, so now you're not a Republican?Y2K wrote:The guy's I'm shilling for?the guys you're shilling for are getting the 30% instead of the 70% they used to get
I don't know or care about your donor activities or lack thereof. They're not germane to the subject at hand.I see. So you are so dense that you think I'm one of the whopping 0.13% of the US population that donates money to candidates?
Could you possibly be any more obstinate or tedious? I never once said that people were giving money to Hillary because they "want" her to win. They're giving money to Dems far in excess of GOP candidates because they see their impending electoral victory in 2008 as inevitable. If you think that will change after the primaries, you're seeing something in the political landscape that nobody else is.Take the tobacco Industry for example. Before the Primary's they will donate 30 to 40% towards say "Hillary" mmmkay?
After Hillary is the chosen candidate they will donate "maybe" 1%.........
Why would the donate to Hillary ahead of the Primary's?
It's not because they want her as President.
Stop being so stupid.
I stand corrected and know exactly what a "Party Shill" actually is and what "shilling" means.They're giving money to Dems far in excess of GOP candidates because they see their impending electoral victory in 2008 as inevitable.
Wow, how shocking.Y2K wrote:Yes Bri, I am a registered as Republican ok?
Sorry if the raw truth has you so pissed. You do understand the exact same logic applied in favor of the GOP during the years prior to 2006?I obviously misunderstood "shilling" as meaning I donate cash but thanks to this quote,
I stand corrected and know exactly what a "Party Shill" actually is and what "shilling" means.They're giving money to Dems far in excess of GOP candidates because they see their impending electoral victory in 2008 as inevitable.
That's what most registered Republicans tell me. Usually right after they shill for their candidates. It's really rather laughable.I don't fucking "shill" for any political party dumbass, Somehow a future as a braindead lemming just doesn't seem worth the effort. I have my own opinions on shit and I vote for whomever I think is worth my time at the booth.
Whatever. I guess you just can't handle the truth. Then again, were I defending a crew whose approval ratings were somewhere between "Go fuck yourself" and "Die pig die", I guess I'd feel obligated to say it was "too early to tell.inevitable........
You can stop the "bleating" anytime soon. You can't grasp the fact that making any "predictions" at all let alone assuming the inevitable by "Following the Money" this early on in an election cycle is pretty fucking stupid at best. OK
12% GOP Congressional approval ratings say what?mvscal wrote:Leave Congress out of this.BSmack wrote:Then again, were I defending a crew whose approval ratings were somewhere between "Go fuck yourself" and "Die pig die",
Y2K wrote:
guy's
Primary's
Primary's?
Stop being so stupid.