So Chargerfan

Mister Bushice · Post by **Mister Bushice** » Mon Jan 07, 2008 7:43 pm

Do you think yesterdays win vindicates Norvy as a HC, or does he have to beat the colts to get removed from the "Not One Real postseason Victory" list?

BSmack · Post by **BSmack** » Mon Jan 07, 2008 8:04 pm

mvscal wrote:He has already done a better job than Douchenbagger, if that's what you're getting at.

WTF are you talking about? Shottenhiemer got the Dolts to the Divisional round last year. Now if they beat the Colts next week, then you have something to talk about.

RevLimiter · Post by **RevLimiter** » Mon Jan 07, 2008 8:10 pm

mvscal wrote:I don't even know what that's supposed to mean. I couldn't care less what he did in Washington and Oakland.

He has already done a better job than Douchenbagger, if that's what you're getting at.

Norvelous shouldn't even be mentioned in the same sentence as Marty Schottenheimer. Marty's regular season record and number of times he got his teams to the postseason speak for themselves. Ignorant players (sup' Marlon McCree) and bad refs have generally screwed him in the playoffs.

mvscal wrote:How many playoff games did Douchenbagger win?

More than Norvelous has.

BSmack · Post by **BSmack** » Mon Jan 07, 2008 8:21 pm

mvscal wrote:
BSmack wrote:WTF are you talking about?
How many playoff games did Douchenbagger win?

He's won 5 games. Not exactly stellar, but better than Norv's 2 wins.

BSmack · Post by **BSmack** » Mon Jan 07, 2008 8:26 pm

mvscal wrote:Try again. I already said I don't give a fuck about what Norv did at Washington and Oakland. Why would I give a fuck about what Douchenbagger did in Fat Retard City?

Marty didn't win shit in San Diego.

And so far Norv has gotten the Bolts right back to where Marty had them last year. Minus the home field "advantage" of course.

ChargerMike · Post by **ChargerMike** » Mon Jan 07, 2008 8:52 pm

Mister Bushice wrote:Do you think yesterdays win vindicates Norvy as a HC, or does he have to beat the colts to get removed from the "Not One Real postseason Victory" list?

..considering the opponent and Antonio Gates available, I don't think a loss (a blowout notwithstanding) to the Colts would taint Norv's reputation much However, a win over Indy, (a better squad than the Bolts) at Indy would remove Norv from your list.

BSmack · Post by **BSmack** » Mon Jan 07, 2008 8:58 pm

mvscal wrote:Post season victories:

Douchenbagger: 0

Norviega: 1

BODE Pineapple Face

You do realize the NFL was founded WAY before Tomlinson was drafted?

trev · Post by **trev** » Tue Jan 08, 2008 12:08 am

Even though Norv isn't the most creative, he PLAYED TO WIN THE GAME yesterday. Marty would have kicked the field goal and put in the prevent and Tenn would have scored. San Diego would not be happy with that. I know Marty was in tears and happy for his guys yesterday. Chargerfan has moved on.

Joe in PB · Post by **Joe in PB** » Tue Jan 08, 2008 2:21 am

^^^^^ Rack

That's exactly what Marty would have done.

Norv still has much to prove in this Charger Fans eyes, but the comeback win in Ten earlier this season was huge, and the team seems to be coming together.

poptart · Post by **poptart** » Tue Jan 08, 2008 2:35 am

Chargertard is verrah amusing.

Last year the Blots were 4th in total offense and 10th in total defense.
This year they were 20th in total offense and 14th in total defense.

Last year they went 14-2.
This year they went 11-5.

And the 11-5 was accomplished this year by beating up on an ass-weak division.

Your team has REGRESSED under pineapple head.

You got over at home on a very .... blah .... Teet.an team at home in the wildcard round.
Great job!

Check back and hand in your evaluation of Norv after this weekend's game.

RevLimiter · Post by **RevLimiter** » Tue Jan 08, 2008 3:11 am

poptart wrote:Chargertard is verrah amusing.

Last year the Blots were 4th in total offense and 10th in total defense.
This year they were 20th in total offense and 14th in total defense.

Last year they went 14-2.
This year they went 11-5.

And the 11-5 was accomplished this year by beating up on an ass-weak division.

Your team has REGRESSED under pineapple head.

You got over at home on a very .... blah .... Teet.an team at home in the wildcard round.
Great job!

Check back and hand in your evaluation of Norv after this weekend's game.

trev · Post by **trev** » Tue Jan 08, 2008 3:15 am

poptart wrote:Chargertard is verrah amusing.

Last year the Blots were 4th in total offense and 10th in total defense.
This year they were 20th in total offense and 14th in total defense.

Last year they went 14-2.
This year they went 11-5.

And the 11-5 was accomplished this year by beating up on an ass-weak division.

Your team has REGRESSED under pineapple head.

You got over at home on a very .... blah .... Teet.an team at home in the wildcard round.
Great job!

Check back and hand in your evaluation of Norv after this weekend's game.

Booooo! Get off the stage!

ChargerMike · Post by **ChargerMike** » Tue Jan 08, 2008 6:09 am

...as we move on to the second round of the playoffs, the 4-12 kibitzers take pot shots from the peanut gallery...now THAT'S verah amusing from where I sit.

...as long as we're throwing :bode:

around in this thread... lets send out :bode:

to Raiduhfan who by last count has :bode:

over Chefan.

poptart · Post by **poptart** » Tue Jan 08, 2008 7:04 am

Yeah, the Raiders suck.
Nobody noticed.

Great retort, Evel.

You know I spoke the truth.

Good luck v. the Clots.

If you win that one I'll kiss Norv's pinkie ring.

BSmack · Post by **BSmack** » Tue Jan 08, 2008 7:08 am

poptart wrote:Great retort, Evel.

BSmack · Post by **BSmack** » Tue Jan 08, 2008 4:29 pm

mvscal wrote:"The truth" is that they won the division last year and they won the division this year and this year they did something that no Charger team has done in 13 years...namely win a playoff game.

Yes, that is an improvement over the Shittenheimer era.

You do understand that obtaining a first round bye IS equivalent to winning a playoff game? Do you?

Enjoy watching your team get slaughtered this weekend.

BSmack · Post by **BSmack** » Tue Jan 08, 2008 4:39 pm

mvscal wrote:
BSmack wrote:You do understand that obtaining a first round bye IS equivalent to winning a playoff game?
No, it isn't. Not in any way shape or form.

Yea, it is. And unless the Bolts win this week, Norv will have not have surpassed Marty's job last year. EOS.

BSmack · Post by **BSmack** » Tue Jan 08, 2008 4:54 pm

mvscal wrote:A bye is not a game nor is it equivalent to a game. The difference is abundantly clear to anyone who isn't slowly suffocating in his own colon.

It most certainly is equivalent to a game. In fact, it is better than having to play a game. That's why teams will fight for the privilege of having a first round bye.

BSmack · Post by **BSmack** » Tue Jan 08, 2008 5:07 pm

mvscal wrote:By definitition, a bye is the absence of a game. So when you say that a bye is the same thing as winning a game or even playing a game, it makes you a fucking moron.

By definition, the Chargers have made the divisional round of the playoffs> Which is exactly what they did last year. To say anything else makes you a fucking moron.

trev · Post by **trev** » Tue Jan 08, 2008 5:07 pm

BSmack wrote: That's why teams will fight for the privilege of having a first round bye.

Is that so?

Prima donna princesses might, but hard core players want to keep playing.

Goober McTuber · Post by **Goober McTuber** » Tue Jan 08, 2008 5:13 pm

trev wrote:
BSmack wrote: That's why teams will fight for the privilege of having a first round bye.
Is that so?

Prima donna princesses might, but hard core players want to keep playing.

OK, I need to know. Are you joking or are you a piss-ignorant slunt?

Neely8 · Post by **Neely8** » Tue Jan 08, 2008 5:21 pm

trev wrote:
BSmack wrote: That's why teams will fight for the privilege of having a first round bye.
Is that so?

Prima donna princesses might, but hard core players want to keep playing.

Is that why most of them took Week 17 off?

So your telling me that battered and bruised players do not want a week off? Coaches do not want an extra week to prepare?

Brilliant.....

BSmack · Post by **BSmack** » Tue Jan 08, 2008 5:31 pm

mvscal wrote:Who gives a fuck? They did it this year by playing a tough schedule and advancing in the first round of the playoffs. Something fuckhead never did in his years coaching this team.

You can't win or lose during a bye week, you fucking dipshit. It isn't the same thing.

A tough schedule?

If you had just taken a look at next year's draft order, you would know that the Chargers had the 12th EASIEST schedule in the NFL.

NFL Draft Order

But seriously, Props to Norv for turning a 14-2 #1 overall seeded team into an 11-5 wild card team and getting the fans of said team to believe he's improved their lot.

trev · Post by **trev** » Tue Jan 08, 2008 5:36 pm

Goober McTuber wrote:
trev wrote:
BSmack wrote: That's why teams will fight for the privilege of having a first round bye.
Is that so?

Prima donna princesses might, but hard core players want to keep playing.
OK, I need to know. Are you joking or are you a piss-ignorant slunt?

All you need to know is that you are off subject of the thread and need to add your 2 cents elsewhere.

trev · Post by **trev** » Tue Jan 08, 2008 5:38 pm

Neely8 wrote:

Is that why most of them took Week 17 off?

So your telling me that battered and bruised players do not want a week off? Coaches do not want an extra week to prepare?

Brilliant.....

Did I touch a nerve with the princess comment?

BSmack · Post by **BSmack** » Tue Jan 08, 2008 6:06 pm

mvscal wrote:Due to the fact that the other teams in the division sucked even worse than they were expected to suck, but those teams have to be played regardless and the strength of the schedule isn't determined at the end of the season, fuckwit.

The fact remains that the Chargers had an easy schedule AND that the relative easy/difficulty of scheduling is determined AFTER the teams play the games, not BEFORE.

Out of the 10 non-division games, 5 of them were against playoff bound teams.

And they went 2-3 in those games. Niiiice. ;)

War Wagon · Post by **War Wagon** » Tue Jan 08, 2008 6:11 pm

trev wrote:
BSmack wrote: That's why teams will fight for the privilege of having a first round bye.
Is that so?

Prima donna princesses might, but hard core players want to keep playing.

Yeah, I'm sure the "princesses" in NE, IND, DAL, and GB were pretty pissed off at the NFL that they didn't get to play last week.

trev · Post by **trev** » Tue Jan 08, 2008 6:19 pm

War Wagon wrote:
trev wrote:
BSmack wrote: That's why teams will fight for the privilege of having a first round bye.
Is that so?

Prima donna princesses might, but hard core players want to keep playing.
Yeah, I'm sure the "princesses" in NE, IND, DAL, and GB were pretty pissed off at the NFL that they didn't get to play last week.

Did I say they were "pissed?"

War Wagon · Post by **War Wagon** » Tue Jan 08, 2008 6:29 pm

trev wrote: Did I say they were "pissed?"

Doesn't matter you "said". What you typed was incredibly stupid, and that's being kind.

Goober McTuber · Post by **Goober McTuber** » Tue Jan 08, 2008 7:30 pm

trev wrote:
Goober McTuber wrote:OK, I need to know. Are you joking or are you a piss-ignorant slunt?
All you need to know is that you are off subject of the thread and need to add your 2 cents elsewhere.

No, to properly comment on the subject I have to know whether you’re just trolling or you’re a Grade A Certified loon.

ChargerMike · Post by **ChargerMike** » Tue Jan 08, 2008 7:32 pm

poptart wrote:Yeah, the Raiders suck.
Nobody noticed.

Great retort, Evel.

You know I spoke the truth.

Good luck v. the Clots.

If you win that one I'll kiss Norv's pinkie ring.

...it's not fair to make an old man spew!

trev · Post by **trev** » Tue Jan 08, 2008 7:41 pm

poptart wrote:
If you win that one I'll kiss Norv's pinkie ring.

He wears it on the tip of his penis.

I'll bring my camera.

trev · Post by **trev** » Tue Jan 08, 2008 7:46 pm

mvscal wrote:Would you say that you have a nice ass, trev?

Is this a trick question?

Dinsdale · Post by **Dinsdale** » Tue Jan 08, 2008 10:21 pm

poptart wrote:Chargertard is verrah amusing.

Gee, YA'THINK???

What tipped you off to this, Pop?

This, maybe?

mvscal wrote:The Chargers match up well against the Colts.

Chargertard is usually good for a chuckle every time they try and sound all football savvy and stuff, but that one in particular was good for a decent guffaw.

Mikey · Post by **Mikey** » Tue Jan 08, 2008 10:28 pm

Seeing as how the Bolts have beaten them once already this season and stuff, I'd say you've got your head up your ass, Dins.

Mikey · Post by **Mikey** » Tue Jan 08, 2008 10:42 pm

Yeah, but they don't match up.

Goober McTuber · Post by **Goober McTuber** » Tue Jan 08, 2008 11:14 pm

mvscal wrote:Seeing as how the Bolts own the series since 2000, they are the best team right now.

What's their yards per carry?

Mikey · Post by **Mikey** » Tue Jan 08, 2008 11:16 pm

Based on the results of this thread, I'd say that Dinsdale is the dumbest cocksucker right now.

ChargerMike · Post by **ChargerMike** » Tue Jan 08, 2008 11:39 pm

Mikey wrote:Based on the results of this thread, I'd say that Dinsdale is the dumbest cocksucker right now.

...and proves it every time he hits submit.

Mikey · Post by **Mikey** » Tue Jan 08, 2008 11:55 pm

Did anyobody here say that the team has improved over last season?

Crawl back in your hole dipshit.