T1B

Nope. Off him. While we're at it, off Jim Delany too. Hell, let's just off the entire hierarchy of college football. That'd make for an excellent start.

Eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth.

If you are convicted of 1st degree murder, you should be shot right after you leave the courtroom. No appeals, no spending 20 years on death row.

War Wagon wrote:Eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth.

If you are convicted of 1st degree murder, you should be shot right after you leave the courtroom. No appeals, no spending 20 years on death row.

Agreed, behind the court house in front of a firing squad.

88 wrote:And if, as a nation, we decide some day to end capital punishment

"As a nation"?

Why do you hate the Tenth Amendment, liberal?

War Wagon wrote:Eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth.

If you are convicted of 1st degree murder, you should be shot right after you leave the courtroom. No appeals, no spending 20 years on death row.

How Old Testament of you.

That's the New Testament. We're advised to take that one literally, while merely giggling as we parse through the children's fables of the Old Testament.

Let that assholes wish come to fruition.

Van wrote:That's the New Testament. We're advised to take that one literally, while merely giggling as we parse through the children's fables of the Old Testament.

Not necessarily, though if you're a "Christian" you ought to follow Christ's teachings, and he directly repudiated that theory.

I must admit I was surprised to see that he's white. Also the girl's last words seem to indicate it was hardly the first time gobbling stepdad's knob while he fondled her clam.

Yeah, off the fuck. Think of it as Electroshock Therapy.

I'm probably even more conservative than mvscal when it comes to this issue. I'd apply a very public death sentence to a whole lotta shit. Oh yes, I'd turn it into a very proper deterrent.

Hell, people who merely wear their pants below their ass - who aren't good looking women - wouldn't escape my Grim Reaper. :twisted:

Van wrote:
Hell, people who merely wear their pants below their ass - who aren't good looking women - wouldn't escape my Grim Reaper. :twisted:

How about just a severe beating for first offenders?

Fine, you get one strike, provided you're under the age of sixteen.

Papa Willie wrote:My ambition is to own a tank and just go down the road blowing away people I don't like the looks of. Then again - I'd be the Omega Man after about 2 weeks of that.

Confucius say: Better to be Omega Man than Omegaverb.

I used to be in favor of the death penalty, and especially for certain referees and league spokesmen.

But I no longer stand in support of the death penalty.

Traditionally I've been against the electric chair......but more in favor of the electric bleacher & doing them all at one time.

But a recent case here has me on the fence. A POS drove up next to a Seattle police car & shot to death a field training officer who was discussing a just-completed traffic stop with his trainee officer. He also slightly wounded the trainee. This came after he fire-bombing a police parking lot with the intent to kill/hurt officers (not just damage the vehicles). Normally I would be fine with offing him.

But when he was captured he tried to shoot the detectives attempting to stop him & ended up being shot himself. One of the bullets that hit him severed his spinal cord, leaving him paralyzed for the rest of his life. Additionally, one television station reported that "massive" amounts of child porn were found on his home computer.

So now I question whether this fucker would just be getting off easy by getting an arm prick before taking a never-ending nap, or if it would be better for him to spend the rest of his life knowing that the rest of the prison population wants a piece of him while he's defenseless.

The fact that he could go out Dahmer-style is almost more appealing (as well as possibly saving the officer's family the anguish of going through each appeal) than giving this guy the death penalty (via old age on death row).

Yet you complain about TVIdiot bringing nothing but boring weak crap. Hypocrite, much?

Not surprisingly, it's the liberal, bleeding heart faggots on this forum that are against the death penalty in this case. Go figure.

It's my opinion that bleeding heart liberals threaten the well being of all of us law abiding normal people. Perhaps the death penalty should be used on bleeding heart liberal and members of the ACLU for putting our lives in danger.

Not surprisingly, it's the liberal, bleeding heart faggots on this forum that are against the death penalty in this case

I'm a constitutional conservative.


We hold these Truths to be self-evident, that all Men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.


Unalienable right to life.

Do you know the meaning of the word unalienable?

You want the state to deny life?

Well, I'll be.


Why do you hate the declaration of independence?


Liberal puke.




:wink:

R-Jack wrote:I could care less about the rights of death row inmates. They earned their ticket.

However, my bloodlust only goes so far. If it costs taxpayers more to put the piece of shit to death than to let him spend his life behind bars, I say they ain't worth it.

If the guy has expressed desire to be put down like a dog, I'm all for a hearty "fuck you" and letting him rot in his cell.

I say we defer the costs of execution by selling viewing tickets to the general public. Back in the day, public executions were quite common. Why do we want to do it in secret, invitation only chambers?

Those who support the death penalty should bear witness to what it is they're behind. I say victims' families and a few friends get free, front-row seats in an 80,000 seat arena where tickets and pay-per-views are sold.

Victims' families should also choose the method of punishment. Say, 5 options? 1. Hanging 2. lethal injection 3. firing squad 4 Guillotine 5. Stoning

We are a capitalist society....why not profit from it?

poptart wrote:

Not surprisingly, it's the liberal, bleeding heart faggots on this forum that are against the death penalty in this case

I'm a constitutional conservative.


We hold these Truths to be self-evident, that all Men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.


Unalienable right to life.

Do you know the meaning of the word unalienable?

You want the state to deny life?

Well, I'll be.


Why do you hate the declaration of independence?


Liberal puke.




:wink:

Our founding fathers would have shot you, faggot!

H4ever wrote: I say we defer the costs of execution by selling viewing tickets to the general public. Back in the day, public executions were quite common. Why do we want to do it in secret, invitation only chambers?

Pretty much the main reason it was banned in the commonwealth. Public execution came to be viewed as a power play, a form of humiliation and taunting when one of your own was put to death by the higher-ups. Crowds stopped being enthused and just got really, really pissed off.

At least they give 'em a pillow to keep them comfortable.

Not much room to roll over on that bed, though.

88 wrote:I'm not opposed to capital punishment, even if it means an innocent person gets killed once in a while.

I have searched this extensively and there is not a single case of a proven wrongful execution since the Death Penalty was reinstated in the early 70's.

88 wrote:(premeditated murder, serial murder, murder against law enforcement officers etc., child rape etc.) where capital punishment is carried out upon conviction. You do something like that, then society has the right to punch your ticket to life permanently. Is it a deterrent? Who gives a fuck? It is a punishment, plain and simple.

RACK. Problem is, they can't give the death penalty for child rape, in fact the rules are becoming so stringent on who can be executed that it is almost impossible to actually get it carried out. One of my legal professors was in on getting the Supreme Court ruling that nobody can be executed who committed their crime under the age of 18, that was a MO case. The dude just wanted to know what it was like to kill someone and duct taped some lady's head and threw her off a bridge about 10 miles from where I live, even telling his accomplices they would never get the death penalty even if they got caught because they were juveniles. She fucking disgusts me. I used to melt her down by making right-wing comments in class all the time.

Lillian Vernon wrote: One of my legal professors was in on getting the Supreme Court ruling that nobody can be executed who committed their crime under the age of 18, that was a MO case. The dude just wanted to know what it was like to kill someone and duct taped some lady's head and threw her off a bridge about 10 miles from where I live, even telling his accomplices they would never get the death penalty even if they got caught because they were juveniles.

Hmm... I remember that incident, it wasn't that long ago.

Where do you live?

War Wagon wrote:

Lillian Vernon wrote: One of my legal professors was in on getting the Supreme Court ruling that nobody can be executed who committed their crime under the age of 18, that was a MO case. The dude just wanted to know what it was like to kill someone and duct taped some lady's head and threw her off a bridge about 10 miles from where I live, even telling his accomplices they would never get the death penalty even if they got caught because they were juveniles.

Hmm... I remember that incident, it wasn't that long ago.

Where do you live?

My money is on right outside of Mexico, Missouri where the Military Academy boys have had their way with her for a number of years.

It happened in Castlewood Park in West St. Louis County, less than 10 miles from where I live.

US Supreme Court prohibits death penalty for juvinile killer. (March 1, 2005) The U.S. Supreme Court has upheld a Missouri Supreme Court case involving death penalty eligibility for minors. At issue was the case of Christopher Simmons, who was 17-years-old when he kidnapped neighbor Shirley Crook in 1993, tied her, and threw her off a bridge in St. Louis County. Prosecutors claimed Simmons had boasted that because of his age he could get away with killing the woman. Initially, Simmons was sentenced to death, but his attorneys argued he should not be executed because of his age at the time of the killing. The State Supreme Court agreed. It set aside Simmons' death sentence and resentenced him to life in prison with no chance for probation or parole. The US Supeme Court has ruled the Missouri Supreme Court took the appropriate action. In making its ruling, the court has barred the death penalty for all killers throughout the country who were under the age of 18 when they committed their crimes.

More on the story here... http://websolutions.learfield.com/death ... 60AA633B76

Lillian Vernon wrote:It happened in Castlewood Park in West St. Louis County, less than 10 miles from where I live.

You're not, like, Bace's ex-girlfriend sent here to haunt me, right? :?

No? phew...

Not the case I remember though, that was much more recent, and local. Same story though. Some punk kid wanting to kill someone just to find out what it was like.

Now that I think about it, it was a freaking chick!

SunCoastSooner wrote:My money is on right outside of Mexico, Missouri where the Military Academy boys have had their way with her for a number of years.

Sounds like fun, but I'd probably wear them all out.

Lillian Vernon wrote:

SunCoastSooner wrote:My money is on right outside of Mexico, Missouri where the Military Academy boys have had their way with her for a number of years.

Sounds like fun, but I'd probably wear them all out.

And Katy does a :fistbump:

Lillian Vernon wrote:

SunCoastSooner wrote:My money is on right outside of Mexico, Missouri where the Military Academy boys have had their way with her for a number of years.

Sounds like fun, but I'd probably wear them all out.

She may be a keeper after all...

Jsc810 wrote: I heard he only asked for peanut butter and jelly sandwiches.

What a dumbshit. You gotta have a lot of cold milk with that or it's just no good.

^^^ Rackworthy

Mikey wrote:

Jsc810 wrote: I heard he only asked for peanut butter and jelly sandwiches.

What a dumbshit. You gotta have a lot of cold milk with that or it's just no good.

Yea, and he should have ordered some desert. I would have grabbed a couple of pints of Ben & Jerry's at least. It's not like he'll have to worry about feeling all bloated the next day.

I'm very much in favor of capital punishment.

In fact, I believe everyone in the Capital (DC and Salem) is quite deserving of severe punishment.

"I'm not opposed to capital punishment, even if it means an innocent person gets killed once in a while"

and if that innocent person happens to be you? or your husband? or your kid? or your friend?

what then dumbfukk?

hypocrite much?

Onions wrote:"I'm not opposed to capital punishment, even if it means an innocent person gets killed once in a while"

and if that innocent person happens to be you? or your husband? or your kid? or your friend?

what then dumbfukk?

hypocrite much?

Oh I'm sure he'd be happy to take one for the team.

Jsc810 wrote:the rest of my life.

Give me $50 on the under.

We are over populated as it is. The less pieces of shit on this planet the better. I would put it on Pay per View and allow the people to see pieces of shit like this guy go away. Hell I believe that public stonings should still happen. Let everyone get a crack at the murderer........

88 wrote:

BSmack wrote:Oh I'm sure he'd be happy to take one for the team.

Not at all. But if you trust in the system, as I do, you would recognize the near impossibility of an innocent man being executed. I don't hide under my desk because I might get struck by lightning, even though I know I'm substantially more likely to be put to death from lightning than by an innocent man is of being executed.

You trust in the system? Are you fucking high?

88 wrote:

BSmack wrote:You trust in the system? Are you fucking high?

Educate me, BSmack. I have spent nearly my entire adult life working in the system. The judges, prosecutors, defense attorneys etc. have always been professional. Why shouldn't I trust the system. Have you got some special glasses that let you see things I cannot see?

Jesus fucking Christ Pollyanna, take off the rose colored shades. Not that I should be surprised that someone who has personally benefited from the justice system as it is currently constituted would be loathe to consider its capricious nature. Here's something to chew on.

http://truthinjustice.org/exonerations-in-us.pdf

BTW: Your comparison between wrongful execution and being hit by lightning is wrong. We can stop wrongful executions. We can't stop lighting.