Is your Atty Gen elected or appointed?
Posted: Fri Oct 29, 2010 12:03 am
Here in God's Country, aka the District of Columbia, we have elections on Tuesday just like the rest of you regular class states (we here in DC are treated as second class citizens, less than people who live in territories). One thing I noticed while going through the voter guide today is that there is an initiative on the ballot to make the District Atty Gen an elected position instead of an appointed position. I think this is mostly because our current AG, Peter Nickles, has spent more time being Mayor Fenty's henchman than actually enforcing the laws of the District. I think the City Council got this put on the ballot.
Made me think to myself, I've never had to vote for this before. What are the pros/cons of having an elected/appointed attorney general? Anyone who has any ideas behind this, feel free to share.
Just to let all you GOPers in advance, whatever you say, I will be voting the opposite, so choose your words carefully.
Dicks.
Made me think to myself, I've never had to vote for this before. What are the pros/cons of having an elected/appointed attorney general? Anyone who has any ideas behind this, feel free to share.
Just to let all you GOPers in advance, whatever you say, I will be voting the opposite, so choose your words carefully.
Dicks.