T1B

Jesus Christ. Just STFU you whiny bitch. We’ll find out who is better five days from now.

Mom always liked you better. Waaaaaaaah.

Then just give us your pick and quit crying over the fact that LSU is rated higher. Alabama is at home. They should win. I’ll take them in the Pick ‘em, which should theoretically give LSU the win.

There's nothing to do in Alabama other then watching SEC Football...

... well, there is Meridian, Mississippi if you really get bored.

Sudden Sam wrote:
BTW, I've got plenty to do here. I have beautiful places to visit in every direction (well, other than west), whether it be the "mountains" or the beach. All kinds of great stuff to do.

I laughed... thanks SS

Look at strength of schedule. Huge difference.

Not a big follower of SEC football.



~da horrah!!~

That being said, Bama seems very strong but I seem to remember a few times when I had the same thought and they rolled over.

LSU seems to have a thing for pulling big games out when they shouldn't be able to.

Just to be contrary I'll say LSU 17-14.

Goober McTuber wrote:Alabama is at home. They should win. I’ll take them in the Pick ‘em, which should theoretically give LSU the win.

What he said.

Sudden Sam wrote:I can see a little difference, but not a whole lot.

Huh? LSU is 13 and Alabama is 35. A little difference? Heck, Boise is even higher than Bama at 31.

Jeff Sagarin’s ratings. So because you don't like what you see, it should be discredited? Ok then.

Python wrote:Jeff Sagarin’s ratings. So because you don't like what you see, it should be discredited? Ok then.

No, but Sagarin could be discredited for having:

Oklahoma at #4 after a loss at home to an unranked team
Stanford at #6
A & M at #8
Texas at #9
Missouri at #11 with their gaudy 4-4 record

Goober McTuber wrote: A & M at #8

1st half A & M or 2nd half A & M?

Two different teams me thinks.

Exactly. How Boise's SOS is ranked so highly is anybody's guess. Bama has two convincing wins over 8-1 teams from solid BCS conferences, and one of those was on the road.

I'm with Sam on this one, and for the same reason: Bama has a stronger, more reliable offense with that O-Line and Trent Richardson. They should be able to move the ball better on LSU's defense than LSU will against Bama's defense. Also, while having the home field hasn't proven to be much of an advantage in the past, most of that past does not include Nick Saban as coach of the Tide. Since he's brought Bama back to the pinnacle, yeah, home field in Tuscaloosa matters.

LSU does do really well on the road, though; probably better than any SEC team. The locale will matter less to them than it would to Bama.

Bama has covered each time I've picked them. I haven't looked it up, but they may have covered in all their games this season. Bama, Stanford and Houston have been my 'locks' in Pick 'Em, even though I haven't been smart enough to ride that Stanford train every week.

Les Miles is one lucky fuck, though. That guy definitely has an angel on his shoulder, so who knows?

Everything I've seen tells me Bama is the better team, although LSU may be the ballsier team. If it's close at the end, I guess that means LSU will win.

Hmmm. Okay...Bama 30-13...or LSU 19-16.

:doh:

So is there any strenght of schedule out there you guys deem as "acceptable"? They all have a big difference between LSU and Alabama.

Goober McTuber wrote:

Python wrote:Jeff Sagarin’s ratings. So because you don't like what you see, it should be discredited? Ok then.

No, but Sagarin could be discredited for having:

Oklahoma at #4 after a loss at home to an unranked team
Stanford at #6
A & M at #8
Texas at #9
Missouri at #11 with their gaudy 4-4 record

Are those Sagarin's SOS rankings or his team rankings? If it's the former, Stanford's inclusion makes no sense. If it's the latter, the other four make no sense.

Van wrote:

Goober McTuber wrote:

Python wrote:Jeff Sagarin’s ratings. So because you don't like what you see, it should be discredited? Ok then.

No, but Sagarin could be discredited for having:

Oklahoma at #4 after a loss at home to an unranked team
Stanford at #6
A & M at #8
Texas at #9
Missouri at #11 with their gaudy 4-4 record

Are those Sagarin's SOS rankings or his team rankings? If it's the former, Stanford's inclusion makes no sense. If it's the latter, the other four make no sense.

Those are team rankings.

Jsc810 wrote:Also this weekend is another game in the SEC with both teams in the top 10, South Carolina (9) at Arkansas (7). Having two conference games in the same weekend where all four teams are in the top 10 doesn't happen that often.

Sincerely,
SECBSH

South Carolina at #9 is a joke. This will be their first game against a ranked opponent.

Arkansas at #7 is a bigger joke.

Sudden Sam wrote:I'm not suggesting that LSU's schedule hasn't been tougher than Alabama's. I would say it's been a little tougher so far. Just a little.

Every strength of schedule ranking out there would disagree with you. Hey, you asked why LSU was getting all the love, and I gave you an answer.

Sudden Sam wrote: It's nice to have finally reached an age where I don't live and die with this shit. It matters to me, but not so much that it ruins my week/month/year.

Same here. I'll be upset if we lose, but that won't last long. I'll go play hide and seek with my daughter and all will be well with the world again. Espcecially if I cheat.

Python wrote:

Sudden Sam wrote:I can see a little difference, but not a whole lot.

Huh? LSU is 13 and Alabama is 35. A little difference? Heck, Boise is even higher than Bama at 31.

According to Sagarin's most recent rankings, Alabama's SOS is 39 and LSU's is 18.

A difference of 21 spots is not at all a huge gap, especially when you consider the fact he ranks 246 teams.

MgoBlue-LightSpecial wrote:A difference of 21 spots is not at all a huge gap,

If you're comparing only two teams ranked 1 and 2, yes it is.

Papa Willie wrote: The SEC is SuckingEdna'sCock right now as a whole.

Is Screwball writing your material for you now?

Papa,

So you say the SEC is awful this year, yet there is a high chance that an SEC team will win yet another national title. Sucks to be any other conference.

Python wrote:Papa,

So you say the SEC is awful this year, yet there is a high chance certainty that an SEC team will win yet another national title. Sucks to be any other conference.

Unfortunately.

I wouldn't go that far, Van. Anybody can lose on any given day. I think Marcus Allen said that.

Okay, I'll grant you the slight possibility that Stanford could beat this year's SEC winner. That's it. No one else has a shot. Oregon won't get it done. Oklahoma's pass-happy spread will get obliterated by those defenses. Okie St's defense will get destroyed. No one from the B1G or ACC need even bother making the trip.

It's Stanford or bust. If they lose before the title game, yep, just go ahead and make it Alabama-LSU Part II for the title.

And you know how badly it galls me to say that.

Sudden Sam wrote:what to expect Saturday.

lots of big hits, and probably a low scoring affair....
the winner? whoever wants it most.....

I'll take a flyer and say Alabama by 4

I've watched enough of LSU and 'Bama's games this year to say Nov 4th is the de facto National Championship as I've said a month ago. Whomever wins will go to the $$$ bowl.

I have a feeling Oklahoma is going to beat Okie State and guess what that sets up for a National Championship?

'Bama/LSU winner vs Boise State.

LSU by 6. Just feel like it's their year this season. That and they always make the NC game in the Superdome's rotation-- lucky fuckers. :twisted:

But yes, this is the real NC game. Whoever wins Saturday is gonna beat the ever living stinkpiss out of some deer-in-headlights opponent.

Atomic Punk wrote:I've watched enough of LSU and 'Bama's games this year to say Nov 4th is the de facto National Championship as I've said a month ago. Whomever wins will go to the $$$ bowl.

I have a feeling Oklahoma is going to beat Okie State and guess what that sets up for a National Championship?

'Bama/LSU winner vs Boise State.

November 4th? Boise State? Have another drink.

Goober McTuber wrote:

Atomic Punk wrote:I've watched enough of LSU and 'Bama's games this year to say Nov 4th is the de facto National Championship as I've said a month ago. Whomever wins will go to the $$$ bowl.

I have a feeling Oklahoma is going to beat Okie State and guess what that sets up for a National Championship?

'Bama/LSU winner vs Boise State.

November 4th? Boise State? Have another drink.

Nov 4th is 'Bama vs LSU. If you've actually seen those teams play you would agree that they are the best teams in the country.

Did you know Boise State is #4 in the BCS rankings? Do you think Boise will lose another game in the weak WAC? I've also stated that Oklahoma (it's in Norman, OK as I've spent my Freshman and Sophomore years there) will most likely beat Okie State (OSU is in Stillwater a few hours north and east off the I-35).

So, the winner of the 'Bama/LSU de facto NC will most likely play Boise State in the BCS $$$ Bowl. So STFU already.

Atomic Punk wrote:

Goober McTuber wrote:

Atomic Punk wrote:I've watched enough of LSU and 'Bama's games this year to say Nov 4th is the de facto National Championship as I've said a month ago. Whomever wins will go to the $$$ bowl.

I have a feeling Oklahoma is going to beat Okie State and guess what that sets up for a National Championship?

'Bama/LSU winner vs Boise State.

November 4th? Boise State? Have another drink.

Nov 4th is 'Bama vs LSU.

They're playing on Friday? The Alabama/LSU loser and the OU/Okie State winner will both finish ahead of Boise and their cupcake schedule. Idiot.

My bad, Nov 5th which is Saturday Dinsgobbles.

I don't know if you've actually seen the BCS rankings, but sadly Boise is ranked #4 and won't lose another game.

You are intentionally being a dumbass.

Papa Willie wrote:

You need to perhaps read more of what I've said (though you won't or don't want to).

Quit being an idiot. I read what you wrote and restated your post. The SEC is down this year, yet the national champions will most likely still come from the conference. Simple really.

Atomic Punk wrote:My bad, Nov 5th which is Saturday Dinsgobbles.

I don't know if you've actually seen the BCS rankings, but sadly Boise is ranked #4 and won't lose another game.

You are intentionally being a dumbass.

The Nov 5th date has been mentioned repeatedly on this board.

I don’t think you understand how the BCS works. Just because Boise finishes 12-0 doesn’t mean that the voters and the computers won’t have the Alabama/LSU loser ahead of them.

I don’t believe you can help being a dumbass. Dumbass.

Gobbles, I've stated Nov 5th in a previous thread but you seem to lock on my Nov 4 date in this thread to give yourself what you think is "credibility." Actually, Nov 4 is when I have to payoff your great grand-daughter for unmentionable sexual escapades accrued over the last month. I'm going to stop seeing her now that she is getting tattoos on her tits and nipple rings and other piercings.

Your last response makes me think your Winter home is in Kansas City.

So tell me, dumbass, have you figured out yet why Boise isn’t going to be in the NCG? Do you even know what day it is, dumbass?

Goober McTuber wrote:So tell me, dumbass, have you figured out yet why Boise isn’t going to be in the NCG? Do you even know what day it is, dumbass?

Look Gobbles in this respect... Many are bitching about Boise State not getting a legit shot at the title. So if the winner of the 'Bama/LSU game gives them a beat down in the NCG, then it will end the argument for Boise. Remember BYU getting the title years ago when they clearly weren't the best?

Same thing here. Yes, I agree with you, however the BCS has Boise ranked at #4 right now. My feeling is Oklahoma is going to beat Okie State and the writers are going to make a mockery of the NCG by putting a gimmick Boise State in to make a point.

Do you even comprehend my point? I'm with you on who "should" be in the title game but since we are looking at conference realignments... the sports writers are going to say "fuck it" and put Boise in there to piss people off.

Your turn, as I know you have a need to get the last word in.

Atomic Punk wrote:

Goober McTuber wrote:So tell me, dumbass, have you figured out yet why Boise isn’t going to be in the NCG? Do you even know what day it is, dumbass?

Look Gobbles in this respect... Many are bitching about Boise State not getting a legit shot at the title. So if the winner of the 'Bama/LSU game gives them a beat down in the NCG, then it will end the argument for Boise. Remember BYU getting the title years ago when they clearly weren't the best?

Same thing here. Yes, I agree with you, however the BCS has Boise ranked at #4 right now. My feeling is Oklahoma is going to beat Okie State and the writers are going to make a mockery of the NCG by putting a gimmick Boise State in to make a point.

Do you even comprehend my point? I'm with you on who "should" be in the title game but since we are looking at conference realignments... the sports writers are going to say "fuck it" and put Boise in there to piss people off.

Your turn, as I know you have a need to get the last word in.

The sports writers are going to just try to piss people off? You mean the sportswriters who vote in the AP poll? The same AP poll which has no bearing on the BCS rankings?

Are the computers also going to just try to piss people off? You are a incredibly stupid individual.

Actually the BCS has Stanford at #4. Boise State is #5.
With their remaining schedules there's no way that Boise will pass Stanford, assuming that they both win out.
The Cowpies would still have to lose a game for either of them to get a shot.

Reading comprehension is a wonderful thing.