Page 1 of 1

Re: Alabama Is Not a #1 Team

Posted: Mon Sep 23, 2013 2:19 pm
by Python
Sudden Sam wrote:
It's yours for the taking, Oregon.
Yeah, that's always worked out well for them. Severe SEC bias and such.

Re: Alabama Is Not a #1 Team

Posted: Mon Sep 23, 2013 5:27 pm
by Goober McTuber
Papa Willie wrote:
Python wrote:
Sudden Sam wrote:
It's yours for the taking, Oregon.
Yeah, that's always worked out well for them. Severe SEC bias and such.
It's funny how we get tagged with the SECBSH thing - when all you have to do is to look at M2 & Schitt. That's conference BSH'ering at it's very best.
If M2 and Schmick is where you've set your posting bar, it's no wonder you suck at this.

Re: Alabama Is Not a #1 Team

Posted: Tue Sep 24, 2013 2:33 am
by Moby Dick
so who's number 1?

Baylor?

cause they're breaking records , bub.


Bama is a legit 1 right now. and rightfully so..and should stay there till they get beat.


just my .03 pennies tho.

Re: Alabama Is Not a #1 Team

Posted: Tue Sep 24, 2013 7:28 am
by MiketheangrydrunkenCUfan
I didn't get to watch the game, but I assumed that Saban was just doing the honorable thing by playing conservative football and not running up the score all Oregon-style against his homeboy McElwain. Did the Tide really look that bad?