T1B

I guess he is as guilty of ignoring science as those he wants to punish, given the last 14 years or so of data.

Be careful what you wish for.

Looks to me like RFK Jr's face has been punished.

Kinda hard to take that assclown seriously when he sounds like Elmer Fudd on ludes.

Climate scientists are not hookers or they would be working for an industry that makes billions. How come the oil companies have hoards of attorneys fighting for them but almost no scientists? Because attorneys actually are hookers.

88,
Are you are open minded about the science of 911? How about the science of fossil fuel pollution? How about peak oil?

Moving Sale wrote: the science of 911?

Psychology is the science that covers this.

Dude is nothing but contradictions.

He claims Washington is destroying local control and local democracies. Ok, then come out in favor of eliminating the EPA.


He claims it isn't individual choices, but Washington politicians that are the problem. Ok, so why do you care that I own two SUVs?

Dinsdale wrote:

Moving Sale wrote: the science of 911?

Psychology is the science that covers this.

Do tell.

Ok, then come out in favor of eliminating the EPA.

I think the EPA is generally a good idea, but most of what they do is clearly unconstitutional.

Moving Sale wrote:Because attorneys actually are hookers.

Similar but different. I pay a hooker to fuck me. I pay an attorney to fuck someone else.

Moving Sale wrote: How come the oil companies have hoards of attorneys fighting for them but almost no scientists?

Oil companies actually have a huge amount of scientists working for them, they are called geologists.

Further the majority of attorneys working for oil companies are involved in property rights. Negotiating and writing agreements with land owners and mineral rights holders for access. The next largest group is involved in making sure they don't violate EPA and state agency laws that are often in conflict with themselves or each other.

Moving Sale wrote:Climate scientists are not hookers or they would be working for an industry that makes billions.

They are, you fucking idiot.

Hustling bogus climate change is a multi-billion dollar industry. It is averaging about 11 billion dollars a year in US Federal outlays alone. That doesn't even include state, international, private and other NGO spending.

http://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R43227.pdf

http://www.forbes.com/sites/larrybell/2 ... -hysteria/

Now go fuck yourself, you lumpy dwarf.

I work for a major oil company. They pay me a lot of money for what I do and they match my 401k at an 8%clip along with giving me a pension. My job is directly involved with one of six flares at our facility. We rarely use it and when we do, it burns very clean. It's amazing how far we've come in the industry when recovering these off-gases and reproducing them. Emission permits keep decreasing every year for every facility, so they adapt and engineer and build derivative units that prevent flare emissions on a regular basis.

I believe in the long term, C02 emissions will be greatly reduced as scientists and engineers continue to figure out how to capture and reproduce everything that was once burned to the atmosphere. And if the earth continues to warm? Wacky environmental scientists will have to blame someone else.

KC Scott wrote:I believe the climate is changing

I don't believe we are the cause of it

Don't get me wrong -- humans have undoubtedly changed the carbon cycle. Removing hydrocarbons from the crust and putting them into the atmosphere is obviously going to have an effect on something.

CO2 can readily be proven to absorb solar radiation(in the infrared range). That science is indeed "settled" (for at least 80+ years).

BUT... the amount of radiation that CO2 can absorb and emit (provable, repeatable), and what the Cult claims, just don't add up.

Junk science, and decades from being understood in any meaningful way.

So to a person who can separate science from politics, the jury is still way out on this one. What I am fairly confident in, is that the Cultists are full of hot air.

Some inbred chowd trolls some climate bullshit, which we all know is bullshit and just a run for publicity, and everyone here actually starts debating it. Pretty funny.

88 wrote:Last night John Stewart made fun of those who question the settled "science" of human-driven climate change purportedly caused by CO2 emissions.

Not exactly. He was making fun of members of a House Science Committee whose Koch influenced members were asking stupid questions.

88 wrote:Not all of the questions were stupid (some were, and most were not if they were received in the proper context). For example, one of the members of the committee who Stewart pilloried asked why the melting of ice would cause a rise in sea level. The member was discussing sea ice at the time, which is something the AGW crowd crows about when it shrinks (but disregards when it expands, but I digress). Nevertheless, Stewart took the member's question out of context and made it appear as if the member had no idea that there was ice on land that could melt. Funny. But intellectually dishonest. He does that a lot, you know.

You can disagree on whether the bit was accurate. I was just pointing out the actual targets of Stewart's bit. Which were the idiot congressmen. All of whom list the industries they are supposed to provide oversight for as their largest donors.

I'm sorry, I thought you at least knew the basic facts of 911, but if you think a plane hit building 7 then you have a lot to learn before we ever get to any real science. As for the rest, we can move to those once you get up to speed on the basic facts of something that happened 13 year ago.

88 wrote:I hear what you're saying. When is Stewart going to bash the liberals in congress for accepting donations from public employee unions?

So we can agree on what Stewart was doing. Good. Maybe you can pitch something funny to the show about things you care about.

Ah yes, building 7. Of course.

Do tell.

88 wrote:When is Stewart going to bash the liberals in congress for accepting donations from public employee unions?

Public employee unions?

Pshaw.

The really ridiculous thing about the Left/Commie/Anti-Freedom Movement contingent is they scream "KOCH BROTHERS!!!!" more than Tiny drones on with the "do tell/white flag" tedium, and all the while Soros is propping up their side at better than a 10-1 clip over the evil Koch's -- but it's OK to "buy" elections, as long as it's your side winning.

I guess there's a fundamental difference -- the Koch's buy elections to keep their money, Soros buys them to take yours.

Why don't you start. And instead of posing questions, give your explanation as to why it collapsed citing facts.

Ah burden shitfing. I don't have a theory as to why it fell. Do you?

Dinsdale wrote: Tiny

Why are you so obsessed with my body? It's creepy.

Why are you so obsessed with repeating yourself ad nauseam?

You are the one commenting in my body post after post after post. I'm just responding to your posts.
KYOA much ditch digger?

Why are you so obsessed with my profession (one I've never held)?

Are you going to answer the question ditch digger?

Since you're a proven liar... no.

Name one lie you fucking POS.

Moving Sale wrote:Name one lie you fucking POS.

Your previous post would be a glaring one.

It's truer than your midget/tiny lines and doesn't involve me obsessing over your body all the time.
How is that multiple kicking of your own sorry ass going?

88,
I didn't see any science in that link or in your post. You know, stuff like the number of columns. The size, shape and material make up of the columns. The live and dead loads of the building. The temp of the fires. Pretty simple stuff.

TIA

Moving Sale wrote:your own sorry ass

Why are you obsessing over my body? It's creepy.

And you managed to do it in a post where you invoked KYOA...

you really, truly aren't capable of thinking things through...

Idiot.

It's a figure of speech, and I said it once. Care to try again you lying, yellow asshat?

I was asking the same thing you are asking of the climate change crowd. Namely, the science that backs up your theory. If it is so obvious then it shouldn't be too hard.

Nice trick pony.

You have no idea what you are doing do you?

Why are you so obsessed with my body? It's freakin' creepy.