T1B

Let's be clear, the GOP malignancy which stole the 2000 and '04 elections (and we won't speak of the current Manchurian Candidate) and which vigorously spawned the Permanent War which currently dominates all facets of national and foreign policy, is not ready to give up an inch of its sordid gains. And to this end it realizes that the 2016 presidential stakes are really for all the marbles. That is, the launching of the war against Iran, as well as sewing up the Supreme Court for the indefinite future. And so the combing and winnowing of candidates has achieved a finer and more discriminating bent. No Rick Perry or Ted Cruz reeling radicals, and no immediately hateful robots like Scott Walker. No more of the venerable Bush contagion. No sudden ethnics or women. No risks. And ironically, that leaves a blue-eyed military veteran with extensive experience in the senate, a proper war-mongering servant of AIPAC and all for which it stands. And that's Lindsey Graham.

Hey fellas...it's me or Hillary...

Shlomart Ben Yisrael wrote:

Looks tasty.

Sin,

Shrubber

Do you really think Lindsey stands a snow ball's chance in hell of getting the nomination?

This country can not take 2 gax presidents in a row.

I wouldn't have thought so a month ago, but it's clear that the quiet acceptance and anointing by the otherwise passive mainstream media is underway. For example, repeated positive gushing by both Shields and Brooks on the PBS News, and similar placements of his "new" mainstream appeal. Sure, who else? Walker? Bush? It's a very short list indeed, and those two are somehow unelectable, even against Hillary.

What an interesting and refreshing thread. Bookmarking for bathroom reading.

MgoBlue-LightSpecial wrote:What an interesting and refreshing thread. Bookmarking for bathroom reading.

Or printing out for bathroom use.

The fact that both he and Hillary are both closeted gays should provide some odd moments. As for veep picks, this too is much more important than in previous elections. Hillary of course wanted Panetta in '08--and still does, but they're both 76 years-old. She can't go with another woman, nor a decidedly younger man. Graham can choose young--and even a woman--but none of the current candidates.

Shlomart Ben Yisrael wrote:

That's a start!

Sin,
Rushbo

None of the resets of the handful of pills photo were the least bit funny. Just so you all know.

Marty's original post was très amusant.

LTS TRN 2 wrote:The fact that both he and Hillary are both closeted gays should provide some odd moments. As for veep picks, this too is much more important than in previous elections. Hillary of course wanted Panetta in '08--and still does, but they're both 76 years-old. She can't go with another woman, nor a decidedly younger man. Graham can choose young--and even a woman--but none of the current candidates.

Leon Panetta is a dud. If she's smart she'll pick Sherrod Brown and get a leg up in Ohio while mending fences with her party's liberal wing. It is a win-win.

Graham is a classic southern flamer whose "Streetcar Named Desire" will not be heading to the nomination, much less the White House.

No way in hell Linda Grahamnesty gets so much as a sniff of the nomination.

Sherrod Brown of course should be president. And perhaps he does present an interesting choice of direction in Hillary's otherwise confused and stalled movement. I think she's more worried about alienating the vast conservative fear-whipped welter of America's undecided.

As for the closet gay Graham not getting a sniff....really? Well, sure, if there was a roster of alternative strong GOP malignancies to choose from. But, babs, regardless of who you would personally prefer, who do you see with any sort of possible traction? Perry? Bush? Walker? Of course not, despite the malignant Kochs' promise of $900 million to whomever they choose (and that's Walker all the way). Who else? Closet gay Graham has a lot of name familiarity and money and connections and malignant weaselly ambition. And remember, it's not the people who decide.

Goober McTuber wrote:Marty's original post was très amusant.

You have to get up real early to sneak a Skittle past Marty.

I'll take the guy that has actually read the Constitution.

Rand.

Dinsdale wrote:I'll take the guy that has actually read the Constitution.

Rand.

Well sure, dins, that's who you'd prefer. But he's in dead last among the various GOP malignancies. Just as babs would prefer this guy..

Ya Vol!


The issue is who can slip their slimy self in front of the cherubic-cheeked champion of all things military..

It's me or Hillary...yep..

You done tuning your guitar yet, you gutless rodent?

LTS TRN 2 wrote:As for the closet gay Graham not getting a sniff....really?

Really. He isn't even supposed to win. He's a soft, pliable cock puppet and probably sweating bullets ever since this Dennis Hastert story broke. Do we even want to speculate on what sort of skeletons might be hiding in that twisted fruit's closet?

who do you see with any sort of possible traction? Perry? Bush? Walker?

Bush is on a death spiral. He's actually dumber than Chimpy Magnus and his wife is a strange loon vaguely yet disquietingly reminiscent of Imelda Marcos. The question is who is he going to take with him. He won't be going down alone or in the least bit dignified. I'll call my shot and say his campaign will be one vile, never-ending shit hose of filth.

Perry? Assuming he is no longer strung out on pain meds? Tough row to hoe. I don't care for his chances much.

Walker? The most likely front runner. He is certainly the most seasoned campaigner of the lot. He rarely takes a clean shot. He will need every ounce of that he's got to take his game national.

I would not simply write off Cruz and Paul either. Cruz is the smartest candidate in either party but he's kind of a dick. He is going to have to overcome that perception and it won't be a trivial task.

Paul? Well...I think he will make some points that other candidates will need to address and those responses could be informative.

mvscal wrote:

LTS TRN 2 wrote:As for the closet gay Graham not getting a sniff....really?

Really. He isn't even supposed to win.

Walker? The most likely front runner. He is certainly the most seasoned campaigner of the lot. He rarely takes a clean shot. He will need every ounce of that he's got to take his game national.

What do you mean he's not supposed to win?

And yes, of course Walker is your pick, as I've noted. The Kochs also want him--your plutocrat masters. And since Rohm's not running, the weaselly Walker is all that's left. Fine. But as I've also pointed out, the powers that be recognize his essential default of basic human qualities. And while his utterly shameless machinations indeed have continued in the waistline wasteland of Wisconsin, it's clear he can't sell his mealy message across the nation. And that leaves the bun's up and squealin', Lindsey. Trust me, i'm just as shocked and disgusted as you.

Shlomart Ben Yisrael wrote:You done tuning your guitar yet, you gutless rodent?

And what's this, the spindly one-note schmaltzy quipster who has never offered a notion of interest in politics or any matter of importance is suddenly interested in music? The ankle-biting, baby-blowing hiding man who wouldn't know Verdi from vermicelli is keen on melody and harmonic structure? Sure, take yer meds you tired fraud.

Whoah! Hold everything..Donald Trump has announced his legitimate candidacy, thus throwing the entire GOP malignancy into throes of confusion and chaos. Of course they;re terrified that he's not gay. Lindsey's fretting..

And yes, I'm also black...

LTS TRN 2 wrote: What do you mean he's not supposed to win?

He's a stalking horse.

Well sure, that's what he was last time. But now with only Jeb and Walker remaining as plausible nominees, the powers that be are realizing that neither of those malignant robots could beat Bernie Sanders, let alone a full-court Hillary assault. Of course you and the Kochs and the other malignant "libertarians" are all in with Walker, though he's the more toxic of the two. Here's a shit stain corporate whore who barely survived a recall. The phone call prank of him actually thinking he was talking to his plutocrat master David Koch is more horrifying than funny. It wasn't that he was so gullible and obviously a happy idiot, but rather that his ruthless and criminal tactics were discussed with such casual and affable ease.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WBnSv3a6Nh4

His basic naked agenda of will be revealed to new levels and he'll come off like the disastrous fraud that he is. He can only scare people and smear opponents so long.

Graham, on the other hand, has a relatively clean slate of smearing, and a lot more back room power brokers taking him seriously.

Well of course he is, he's a perpetual liar, what else do you expect?

I'm hardly the one avoiding issues here. As for willers crappy guitar playing, who cares? The idea of asking tunnel-vision fetal-positioned ankle-biting clowns to judge my playing is a joke. Are you kidding? Suffice to say, I play over actual changes and play real melodies. Game over right there. willers' playing is just like his brain-dead utterly boring and tedious self--as revealed in his hillbilly meandering interview. The 14 year-old chick playing the Metallica cover is better than him by virtue of playing an actual solo.

As for Lindsey Graham sneaking in as the malignant GOP nominee, sure it would be shocking and weird, but make no mistake, the Kochs and similar sinister agencies really don't want to lose this one. And Walker and Jeb are losers.

No, I really don't care about you and I'm actually talking about something real. Sheesh..

Do you have any idea what wakey wake really means? The applied slumber within which you awkwardly paw and pretend to be alive? Sure...silly circle-jerk parodies of The Downfall..right..but...no...not even close. :wink:

Shlomart Ben Yisrael wrote:You done tuning your guitar yet, you gutless rodent?

you're the one that threw down the gauntlet now it's incumbent on you to demonstrate your abilities

Papa Willie wrote:He does seem to be avoiding this, isn't he?

and you expected something else??????

Jay in Phoenix wrote:Well of course he is, he's a perpetual liar, what else do you expect?

I was actually hoping he might in fact play, but no doubt he's bullshitting again.....he doesn't even know what he's talking about

LTS TRN 2 wrote:The idea of asking tunnel-vision fetal-positioned ankle-biting clowns to judge my playing is a joke. Are you kidding? Suffice to say, I play over actual changes and play real melodies.

I'd be perfectly fair.....I'd love to hear these transitiions you keep claiming you can make....just demonstrate your ability to a bend a string with an audible release, and a pull-off with the bending finger and target the note on the next lower string....that is a basic move in lead guitar playing....one of the best examples of this technique is Jimmy Page's work on Heartbreaker.....

The bottom line is LTS is caught up yet again in more bullshit he can't back up. Dude has probably never even held a guitar, let alone play one.

Spray would shred Nickole apart.

Bullshit. I'll tell you exactly what would happen. He'd play his tedious faux-metal crap, with a few cliche blues and rock riffs. And I'd run circles around him with actual blues, country, jazz, rock, and classical. Fuck all, he'd be bitching that it couldn't be me. I'd stole it or some shit. What a total clown. Didn't anyone hear him on that "interview"? He's like an ashtray with a hangover.

As for the triple UnWonderful Insanity of the malignant GOP (and Barry), the "fast-track" treachery is coming back like a zombie that won't die.
http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2015 ... bill-house

I realize most of you knuckle-dragging wastes of oxygen are peering fearfully from the trenches of Hannity and Limpdick , and don't dare think or even consider an actual issue of tremendous consequence, ...but hey,

Wake The Fuck Up!1

No dumb fuck, prove you can play.

Or shut the fuck up.

Fuck off. You're the same toxic fraud who for years has refused to even try and defend any specific part of the official 9/11 story. And suddenly you're demanding evidence of my musicality? Of course you can't proceed in the former, and you'd be walking into a propeller with the latter. At issue isn't me or my skills, but the obvious fake and tedious drivel of willers. Perhaps you don't get it, but I was actually disgusted to hear what a total boring hollow hillbilly he really is. As for his standard brain dead guitar playing, it speaks for itself. If you actually think that's quality playing, then why the fuck would i or any serious player care what you think at all? Don't you get it? Yours is a defaulted position from the get go. Now I really don't expect you or the other tedious idiots to start actually making sense or offering quality posts about anything, let alone important subjects. You've already flailed and bailed many, many times.

Quite the senseless, childish ramble there Nick. You sound pissy too.

This is a very simple matter. Prove you can play.

Or stand revealed for the hundredth time as a liar.

Your move creep.

LTS TRN 2 wrote: And I'd run circles around him...

Is your microphone broken? I can FedEx you one overnight.

No, it's not rambling or pissy. And I've never been caught in a lie or disproved in any of my assertions. The simple fact remains that you've never offered anything to substantiate your own childish smears and dismissals regarding all sorts of subjects. You're a weasel among weasels. As I've explained, I have no interest in displaying my musicality or anything personal. I realize its rather unfashionable, but I actually deal with real issues of real importance. That said, I'll flay you or anyone here in a parody or verse contest, etc.

LTS TRN 2 wrote:I've never been caught in a lie

I guess plagiarism doesn't count.

Screw_Michigan wrote:

Shlomart Ben Yisrael wrote:

Looks tasty.

Sin,

Shrubber

Go fuck yourself, shithead.

Oh, sorry,...........I meant..Good One!!! Fresh and new and never been typed here before. Your originality is surpassed only by your lack of mental capacity.

But..good one. har-har. Tis to laugh.

R-Jack wrote:

LTS TRN 2 wrote:I've never been caught in a lie

I guess plagiarism doesn't count.

If you're referring to one unsourced quote, who gives a fuck? It's the content that counts. My positions are backed up. Yours and your playground brats offer nothing but the usual sips and snipes. You should be embarrassed.

Good lord, where to begin with this tripe. Yes, it was rambling and pissy. You're getting angrier with every post. This happens because you've been backed into a corner and all you've got nothing in defense. The simple fact remains that you plagiarized, whined and lied your way that corner and are crapping all over yourself in fear.

You have no interest in displaying your musical ability because you have none. As to dealing with real issues, if that means repeating yourself ad nauseam on a message board where nobody gives a rats ass about your tedious drek, then yes, you're dealing with it alright. You might want to change hands however as you are, the feeling of a "stranger in the tub" might give you a thrill.

I've already slaughtered you in parody and verse, with my "Tard in the Life" takeoff, which you had no comeback for whatsoever. But go ahead 'tard, give it a shot. Show us your brilliant repartee.

LTS TRN 2 wrote:
If you're referring to one unsourced quote.

Haha funny.

Plus, you know it's been well more than once.

LTS CTRL-C wrote:one unsourced quote

LTS CTRL-V wrote:It's the content that counts.

...said every plagiarist ever?

Here's the problem, Nick. If you can't produce your own content, then fine. But you might want to ease up on belittling others for not having a "take." Your general lack of awareness is astounding.