T1B

My pops took this photo off the deck of his cabin up in Canaduh. He said the cross was a reflection from the clouds.





Is this a sign from the Head Honcho...and what do you think it means???

My theory: He is sending a message to Goobs and the rest of his ilk that Wisconsin, is in fact, NOT God's Country, but rather, Southern Ontario is.

It's a sign that one should give all their money to Pastor Richards.

I had a really hot boyfriend when I was 18. He saw crosses in lots of everyday things. It wasn't long before his flat out lame and disgustedness outweighed his hotness.........

MgoBlue-LightSpecial wrote:My pops took this photo off the deck of his cabin

Tell your dad (and Goobs), nice view but the deck sucks Old Milwaukee.

~Dins

Diego in Seattle wrote:It's a sign that one should give all their money to Pastor Richards.

Nope it should go to Creflo Dollar for his G650.

Hey Mgo, what lake is your pop's cabin on? Cabin in Canada? Didn't realize you come from money.

Goober McTuber wrote:Didn't realize you come from money.

Pfft. Far from it. It's some shanty on WaWa Lake I believe. I've never been up there.

Interesting photo when you look up Wawa on Trip Advisor:

http://www.tripadvisor.com/Tourism-g182 ... tions.html

MgoBlue-LightSpecial wrote:My pops took this photo off the deck of his cabin up in Canaduh. He said the cross was a reflection from the clouds.





Is this a sign from the Head Honcho...and what do you think it means???

My theory: He is sending a message to Goobs and the rest of his ilk that Wisconsin, is in fact, NOT God's Country, but rather, Southern Ontario is.

It's kind of a nice picture.
That's it.


Hebrews 1:1-2
God, who at sundry times and in divers manners spake in time past unto the fathers by the prophets,
Hath in these last days spoken unto us by his Son, whom he hath appointed heir of all things, by whom also he made the worlds.


God spoke by the prophets, and it is recorded as the Old Testament.
Then He spoke by Jesus Christ, and it is recorded in the New Testament.

Whatever God has to tell us is recorded in the Bible.

Jsc810 wrote:

I had to laugh when Russell Wilson recently said that God "led" him to his current girlfriend, Ciara...



I mean, of all the women in the world, it just happened to be someone who is rich, famous, and attractive. Funny how things work out that way.

And pop, thanks for your contribution. It is always appreciated.

Jsc wrote:So when people say that they spoke to God and He told them to do something (for example), then you will agree that they are full of shit, right?

In many, many (or perhaps most) cases, yes, they are full of shit, imo.

What you (and Mgo) pointed out is true.

There are various reasons why people are full of shit this way, and it all stems from disbelief that God's Word is enough and... final.

God answers prayers of believers, absolutely.
The answers believers receive are never in contradiction to what is in His Word.
The answers come through the Word.

And btw, Jesus Christ IS the Word.
John 1:1, John 1:14.

Fiction is Bernie Sanders for president.

MgoBlue-LightSpecial wrote:

Her implants were made by God.

Amen.

Jsc810 wrote:
I'm glad that your faith brings you some comfort, poptart, and yes, I will fight for your right to practice that faith as you deem appropriate. But it is fiction.

Again, why the need to define a disagreement in your terms? You might believe it to be fiction as might many others, does that make it so? If you answer is yes, then prove it 100% and there is no longer a disagreement.

Left Seater wrote:Again, why the need to define a disagreement in your terms? You might believe it to be fiction as might many others, does that make it so? If you answer is yes, then prove it 100% and there is no longer a disagreement.

The burden of proof is on the Christers, not the other way around. They are the ones making the claim that a magical bearded man in the sky makes the world go 'round despite zero proof to date.

Left Seater wrote:Again, why the need to define a disagreement in your terms? You might believe it to be fiction as might many others, does that make it so? If you answer is yes, then prove it 100% and there is no longer a disagreement.

I could give a shit if there is or is not a god. If there is he his not worthy of worship because he's obviously malevolent. If there is no god, Poptart is just a loon wasting his time. Either way, fucked if I care.

I would say indifferent rather than malevolent.

mvscal wrote:I would say indifferent rather than malevolent.

So indifference to suffering when this "being" is allegedly capable of ending it isn't malevolent?

Ponderous.

Jsc810 wrote:I'm glad that your faith brings you some comfort, poptart, and yes, I will fight for your right to practice that faith as you deem appropriate. But it is fiction. And deep down inside, even if you won't admit it, you know that's true.

You won't fight for anything other than aborting fetuses.

GFY with your all knowing pompous posing.

Diego wrote:indifference to suffering

Suffering is what we brought to ourselves.
We left God. Romans 3:23.
You left God.

The negative results that come from that are rightful.

God provided us a way out of our suffering.

Jesus came in COMPLETE fulfillment of Old Testament promises and prophecies.
The fulfillment is phenomenal, overwhelming and evident to anyone who opens eyes and just looks at it.
Yet people somehow choose to deny this has happened.


John 3:19
And this is the condemnation, that light is come into the world, and men loved darkness rather than light, because their deeds were evil.

Has anybody figured out that picture is a projection through a window pane or door directly behind the camera angle yet? Notice the borders around the window or door pane yet? Hell, even the Weather Channel had a show this past week on reverse images seen in clouds that freaked out people even more. Idiots climbing mountains with the Sun lower and behind made it look like Jesus was in the clouds. Same thing here only the Sun was higher and behind the picture taker.

MgoBlue-LightSpecial wrote:

Left Seater wrote:Again, why the need to define a disagreement in your terms? You might believe it to be fiction as might many others, does that make it so? If you answer is yes, then prove it 100% and there is no longer a disagreement.

The burden of proof is on the Christers, not the other way around. They are the ones making the claim that a magical bearded man in the sky makes the world go 'round despite zero proof to date.

Socrates, Thomas Aquinas, C.S. Lewis, I could go on. All deluded idiots, but Mgo!!!!!!!!!!!!

FINALLY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! The most prodigious philosopher and thinker since history began knows better than them.

Ummm.... X 1,000,000,000

You don't believe, cool. I think it would be best for you to just shut up.

Sincerely,

95% of the planet

Atomic Punk wrote:Has anybody figured out that picture is a projection through a window pane or door directly behind the camera angle yet?

It is neither of those things, but that was my first thought as well.

Roger_the_Shrubber wrote:Socrates, Thomas Aquinas, C.S. Lewis, I could go on. All deluded idiots, but Mgo!!!!!!!!!!!!

FINALLY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! The most prodigious philosopher and thinker since history began knows better than them.

Ummm.... X 1,000,000,000

You don't believe, cool. I think it would be best for you to just shut up.

Sincerely,

95% of the planet

Is there supposed to be some "proof" in this jumbled mess of a post?

Go back to bed, buddy.

Diego in Seattle wrote:

mvscal wrote:I would say indifferent rather than malevolent.

So indifference to suffering when this "being" is allegedly capable of ending it isn't malevolent?

No, it isn't. Nor is it my responsibility to remediate your ignorance. I would recommend you start with a dictionary.

Can't nobody call someone a fukking idiot with as much style as mvscal.

mvscal wrote:I would say indifferent rather than malevolent.

Indifferent or malevolent, who cares. I simply call it being a world class fukking asshole.

Your great X 1,000 grandpa didn't follow a rule, is a poor reason to stand aside as horrible shit happens to someone.

Atomic Punk wrote:. . . picture is a projection through a window pane or door directly behind the camera angle yet? . . .

You are pretty good at taking pictures with reflections and mirrors stuff. Are you aware photoshop has a new Anal Ease Vignetting Tool, get it and your fantasies can come true.

And be careful with this shit as you drift into weekend.

mvscal wrote:I would say indifferent rather than malevolent.

I say malevolent because if there is an all knowing all powerful being capable of ending suffering and said being does not do humanity a solid by straightening that shit out that he is no friend to humanity. In fact he would be an enemy.

MgoBlue-LightSpecial wrote:

Roger_the_Shrubber wrote:Socrates, Thomas Aquinas, C.S. Lewis, I could go on. All deluded idiots, but Mgo!!!!!!!!!!!!

FINALLY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! The most prodigious philosopher and thinker since history began knows better than them.

Ummm.... X 1,000,000,000

You don't believe, cool. I think it would be best for you to just shut up.

Sincerely,

95% of the planet

Is there supposed to be some "proof" in this jumbled mess of a post?

Go back to bed, buddy.

Nice comeback.

Repeat, on this subject, just shaddup.

Dear Lord, thank you for this meal which I am about to receive. Please allow it to give me the strength I need to log on to T1B and tell that big fat meanie Mgo to shut up! He says mean things about you and I just wish he'd shut up! Also, uhh, if you could do me a solid and hook a brother up with some quality indica, that'd be great. You know, for my back and stuff. Uhh, yeah, that's the ticket. Amen.

BSmack wrote:

mvscal wrote:I would say indifferent rather than malevolent.

I say malevolent because if there is an all knowing all powerful being capable of ending suffering and said being does not do humanity a solid by straightening that shit out that he is no friend to humanity. In fact he would be an enemy.

I would say that you are another flatheaded dope in need of a dictionary.

Obviously, "pear-boy" is still a virgin.