Page 1 of 1
Re: 0.4%
Posted: Fri Dec 27, 2019 9:59 pm
by smackaholic
Asylum cases should be decided at the border, very quickly.
My take on DACA kids is that if they came here before the age of 12, they should be allowed to stay legally, but they should not be eligible for citizenship or voting.
If they want to become citizens, let them return to their native land and apply like everyone else must.
If they came here after 12, send them home.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Re: 0.4%
Posted: Fri Dec 27, 2019 10:24 pm
by The State
schmick wrote: ↑Fri Dec 27, 2019 9:53 pm
100% of people seeking asylum in this country should agree to be sterilized before their asylum case is even considered
Go fuck yourself.
You don't even live in this country... why the fuck would you care.
You live in Mexico. The California and US border starts at Santa Barbara around Oprah's house near Rincon.
Re: 0.4%
Posted: Fri Dec 27, 2019 10:29 pm
by The State
smackaholic wrote: ↑Fri Dec 27, 2019 9:59 pm
My take on DACA kids is that if they came here before the age of 12, they should be allowed to stay legally, but they should not be eligible for citizenship or voting.
If they want to become citizens, let them return to their native land and apply like everyone else must.
You're a fucking moron.
My take is... FAT FUCKING RETARDS should be deported. Just because.
Whada ya say, skinny ?
Re: 0.4%
Posted: Fri Dec 27, 2019 10:38 pm
by smackaholic
Fuck off, carnie.
Re: 0.4%
Posted: Fri Dec 27, 2019 10:49 pm
by The State
smackaholic wrote: ↑Fri Dec 27, 2019 10:38 pm
Fuck off, carnie.
Such a stinging rebuttal.
Get out of my country... you FAT FUCKING RETARD.
If you lose weight you can stay. But you can't vote. We can't trust that you won't get FAT again and we can't take that chance.
Make America Great Again !
Re: 0.4%
Posted: Sat Dec 28, 2019 4:18 am
by Kierland
schmick wrote: ↑Fri Dec 27, 2019 9:53 pm
Thats the percentage of asylum cases in to the United States that are granted to the Remain in Mexico program.
Show your work you paste eating gibbon.
Re: 0.4%
Posted: Sat Dec 28, 2019 3:14 pm
by Kierland
And a gibbon actually did, too bad the article didn’t say what you girlfriend said.
Re: 0.4%
Posted: Sun Dec 29, 2019 4:43 pm
by Mikey
0.4%
Schmick’s percentile on the intelligence spectrum.
‘Spray’s percentile on the reading comprehension spectrum.
Marty’s percentile on the Funnay spectrum, despite being at 99.6% for level of effort.
Re: 0.4%
Posted: Sun Dec 29, 2019 8:30 pm
by EAP
Mikey wrote: ↑Sun Dec 29, 2019 4:43 pm
0.4%
Schmick’s percentile on the intelligence spectrum.
‘Spray’s percentile on the reading comprehension spectrum.
Marty’s percentile on the Funnay spectrum, despite being at 99.6% for level of effort.
0.4% is mikey's penile percentile in relation to the rest of the board's.
Re: 0.4%
Posted: Sun Dec 29, 2019 8:36 pm
by Innocent Bystander
EAP wrote: ↑Sun Dec 29, 2019 8:30 pm
Mikey wrote: ↑Sun Dec 29, 2019 4:43 pm
0.4%
Schmick’s percentile on the intelligence spectrum.
‘Spray’s percentile on the reading comprehension spectrum.
Marty’s percentile on the Funnay spectrum, despite being at 99.6% for level of effort.
0.4% is mikey's penile percentile in relation to the rest of the board's.
Penis is not important.
I agree with Smackaholic.
Re: 0.4%
Posted: Sun Dec 29, 2019 8:37 pm
by Mikey
EAP wrote: ↑Sun Dec 29, 2019 8:30 pm
Mikey wrote: ↑Sun Dec 29, 2019 4:43 pm
0.4%
Schmick’s percentile on the intelligence spectrum.
‘Spray’s percentile on the reading comprehension spectrum.
Marty’s percentile on the Funnay spectrum, despite being at 99.6% for level of effort.
0.4% is mikey's penile percentile in relation to the rest of the board's.
I've heard you have lots of experience with penises.
Re: 0.4%
Posted: Sun Dec 29, 2019 8:40 pm
by EAP
Mikey wrote: ↑Sun Dec 29, 2019 8:37 pm
EAP wrote: ↑Sun Dec 29, 2019 8:30 pm
Mikey wrote: ↑Sun Dec 29, 2019 4:43 pm
0.4%
Schmick’s percentile on the intelligence spectrum.
‘Spray’s percentile on the reading comprehension spectrum.
Marty’s percentile on the Funnay spectrum, despite being at 99.6% for level of effort.
0.4% is mikey's penile percentile in relation to the rest of the board's.
I've heard you have lots of experience with penises.
Who doesn't?
Re: 0.4%
Posted: Sun Dec 29, 2019 8:43 pm
by EAP
Mikey wrote: ↑Sun Dec 29, 2019 8:37 pm
EAP wrote: ↑Sun Dec 29, 2019 8:30 pm
Mikey wrote: ↑Sun Dec 29, 2019 4:43 pm
0.4%
Schmick’s percentile on the intelligence spectrum.
‘Spray’s percentile on the reading comprehension spectrum.
Marty’s percentile on the Funnay spectrum, despite being at 99.6% for level of effort.
0.4% is mikey's penile percentile in relation to the rest of the board's.
I've heard you have lots of experience with penises.
That in and of itself, wouldn't necessarily qualify as being the resident board expert on the cack.
You'd have to show some solid substance before you get certified by the board elders as such.
Re: 0.4%
Posted: Sun Dec 29, 2019 8:46 pm
by Screw_Michigan
Mikey wrote: ↑Sun Dec 29, 2019 8:37 pm
I've heard you have lots of experience with penises.
Other peoples' penises
Re: 0.4%
Posted: Sun Dec 29, 2019 9:24 pm
by Innocent Bystander
EAP wrote: ↑Sun Dec 29, 2019 8:40 pm
Who doesn't?
Women.
Is it true a dry orgasm is better than a rope-y one?
Re: 0.4%
Posted: Sun Dec 29, 2019 9:52 pm
by EAP
Innocent Bystander wrote: ↑Sun Dec 29, 2019 9:24 pm
EAP wrote: ↑Sun Dec 29, 2019 8:40 pm
Who doesn't?
Women.
Is it true a dry orgasm is better than a rope-y one?
Women? You mean dykes?
If you suffer from dry orgasm syndrome, it's probably diet related. Quit eating McDonald's every day and flirting with those big butt cashiers, and that should solve your problem.
Re: 0.4%
Posted: Sun Dec 29, 2019 10:01 pm
by Innocent Bystander
EAP wrote: ↑Sun Dec 29, 2019 9:52 pm
Innocent Bystander wrote: ↑Sun Dec 29, 2019 9:24 pm
EAP wrote: ↑Sun Dec 29, 2019 8:40 pm
Who doesn't?
Women.
Is it true a dry orgasm is better than a rope-y one?
Women? You mean dykes?
If you suffer from dry orgasm syndrome, it's probably diet related. Quit eating McDonald's every day and flirting with those big butt cashiers, and that should solve your problem.
Women have no experience with penis (and Lesbians don't want any, which is why they are in growing online conflict with MtF transexuals, but more about that never).
I read a comment that dry orgasms were full body orgasms for men, which wet orgasms are not. That person's description of a dry orgasm sounded similar to a woman's. Maybe the commenter was larping. You are proud of your experience with penis, so I asked you to find out if it's true.
So why is a dry orgasm inferior?
Re: 0.4%
Posted: Mon Dec 30, 2019 3:19 am
by EAP
Innocent Bystander wrote: ↑Sun Dec 29, 2019 10:01 pm
EAP wrote: ↑Sun Dec 29, 2019 9:52 pm
Innocent Bystander wrote: ↑Sun Dec 29, 2019 9:24 pm
Women.
Is it true a dry orgasm is better than a rope-y one?
Women? You mean dykes?
If you suffer from dry orgasm syndrome, it's probably diet related. Quit eating McDonald's every day and flirting with those big butt cashiers, and that should solve your problem.
Women have no experience with penis (and Lesbians don't want any, which is why they are in growing online conflict with MtF transexuals, but more about that never).
I read a comment that dry orgasms were full body orgasms for men, which wet orgasms are not. That person's description of a dry orgasm sounded similar to a woman's. Maybe the commenter was larping. You are proud of your experience with penis, so I asked you to find out if it's true.
So why is a dry orgasm inferior?
It's not.
Pleasure without having to clean up.
Unless you like gargling cum and drinking it by the litre.