Ambassador Sondland

It's the 19th Anniversary for T1B - Fuckin' A

Moderator: Jesus H Christ

EAP
Mr. USA
Posts: 4431
Joined: Sat Oct 26, 2019 7:54 pm

Re: Ambassador Sondland

Post by EAP »

Kierland wrote: Thu Nov 21, 2019 2:14 am You are a hack. He offered to unlock the money in exchange for the announcement. It’s like the definition of bribery.

——
Trust the process.
Just throw up conclusions and then tell them to get serious.
Noise and light.
Kill the je... errr they are human scum.

Sin,
88nazis
88 is raping you intellectually.
How much raping can you take?
Are you delusional or just a low IQ fuck?
You keep talking, yet nothing but shit pours out of your mouth.

You are too young and stupid to remember 84.
Reagan took the entire country when the dems put up a left wing weirdo.
Face reality punk. You and screw are left wing weirdos.

You and screw believed that fuckin lying bitch christine ballsy ford? That wacko leftist accused kavanaugh of rape?
And you bought that bullshit?
You are one dumb lunatic.
Kierland

Re: Ambassador Sondland

Post by Kierland »

Blah blah blah a lot.
Don’t discuss the testimony.
Trust the process.

Sin,
88ovens
Kierland

Re: Ambassador Sondland

Post by Kierland »

One more time for the nazis.
Take Joe if you want. Take his son too. I don’t care.
That is not a defense to what Cheetolini did. And where is the evidence?
ONCE AGAIN, it in his call that he released.

——
Trust the process.
Dodge weave smear.
Don’t actually discuss facts just write them off as not being there.

Sin,
88ovens
Kierland

Re: Ambassador Sondland

Post by Kierland »

88 wrote: Thu Nov 21, 2019 4:54 am
Kierland wrote: Thu Nov 21, 2019 4:49 am Blah blah blah a lot.
Don’t discuss the testimony.
Trust the process.

Sin,
88ovens
Post his testimony. I did. Where does it support anything you say? I thought you claimed to be a trial lawyer. Do your client's get sent to jail because someone who does not have any direct information about them presumes they are guilty of something?
When I go to trial the jury actually listens to what we present, well at least some do. I told you 100 times the evidence is the the memo Drumph released.

Play dumb all you want. That doesn’t change any facts.
User avatar
Dr_Phibes
P.H.D - M.B.E. - O.B.E.
Posts: 4211
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 5:11 am

Re: Ambassador Sondland

Post by Dr_Phibes »

Dinsdale wrote: Wed Nov 20, 2019 6:28 pm
Softball Bat wrote: Wed Nov 20, 2019 3:37 pm the Ukraine
I know a ton of Ukrainians. And every last one of them would be rolling their eyes at you right now, if you weren't in the South Korea, and they weren't in the The United States.
So I can't say The Thames, The Congo or The Hague? Ukraine literally meant 'borderland'. I suspect your Ukrainian friends might actually be Polish. Lovely people and wonderfully bright.
User avatar
Softball Bat
Eternal Scobode
Posts: 10903
Joined: Sun Jul 02, 2017 5:02 am

Re: Ambassador Sondland

Post by Softball Bat »

.088 wrote:Its the Russian collusion hoax all over again. They say the big scary orange man did something because they feel it. There is no evidence of it. No one actually heard or saw it.
It isn't the same because f@t Huggy Barr has not come out to lie to the American people about what has been presented.


DId you not see Sondland's testimony?

All of the key U.S. players were operating with the understanding that Ukraine needed to make a public announcement of an investigation into Biden or else the congressionally appropriated funds would not be released.

All of these U.S. players were going rogue, en masse, in a direction opposite of what Donald wanted?

This is what you are selling now?

:lol:



Within the call, which the WH chose to release...


Zelensky: We are ready to continue to cooperate for the next steps specifically we are almost ready to buy more Javelins from the United States for defense puroses.

Trump: I would like you to do us a favor though...


And Donald goes on to describe how they are supposed to look into Biden.

He also described how Ukraine was supposed to work with Rudy Giuliani.


1) What is Rudy Giuliani's position at the State Department?

2) All of the key U.S. players were operating rogue, en masse, you would have us believe. And yet right in this call we have U.S. #1, Donald, directly telling Zelensky that the aid was contingent upon him doing something.

"I would like you to do us a favor though."



Do you like being a major idiot for Donald Trump?

This is good for you?

It is your calling?
Image
88 wrote:I have no idea who Weaselberg is
EAP
Mr. USA
Posts: 4431
Joined: Sat Oct 26, 2019 7:54 pm

Re: Ambassador Sondland

Post by EAP »

Kierland wrote: Thu Nov 21, 2019 4:58 am
88 wrote: Thu Nov 21, 2019 4:54 am
Kierland wrote: Thu Nov 21, 2019 4:49 am Blah blah blah a lot.
Don’t discuss the testimony.
Trust the process.

Sin,
88ovens
Post his testimony. I did. Where does it support anything you say? I thought you claimed to be a trial lawyer. Do your client's get sent to jail because someone who does not have any direct information about them presumes they are guilty of something?
When I go to trial the jury actually listens to what we present, well at least some do. I told you 100 times the evidence is the the memo Drumph released.

Play dumb all you want. That doesn’t change any facts.
You're an attorney?
How is that possible?
This back and forth between you and 88 isn't going well for you.

You are one gullible tard who is very easily manipulated and Duped.
You've been on the wrong side of both the kavanaugh and Russian hoaxes. Effectively making you one dumb clown.
And concerning this latest Democrat impeachment hoax,
Once again you've been manipulated and duped by retards and drug addicts.

You're an attorney? You're a disgrace to the profession.
You give good decent lawyers a bad name.

The left loves gullible sheep like you and screw.
EAP
Mr. USA
Posts: 4431
Joined: Sat Oct 26, 2019 7:54 pm

Re: Ambassador Sondland

Post by EAP »

Softball Bat wrote: Thu Nov 21, 2019 7:01 am
.088 wrote:Its the Russian collusion hoax all over again. They say the big scary orange man did something because they feel it. There is no evidence of it. No one actually heard or saw it.
It isn't the same because f@t Huggy Barr has not come out to lie to the American people about what has been presented.


DId you not see Sondland's testimony?

All of the key U.S. players were operating with the understanding that Ukraine needed to make a public announcement of an investigation into Biden or else the congressionally appropriated funds would not be released.

All of these U.S. players were going rogue, en masse, in a direction opposite of what Donald wanted?

This is what you are selling now?

:lol:



Within the call, which the WH chose to release...


Zelensky: We are ready to continue to cooperate for the next steps specifically we are almost ready to buy more Javelins from the United States for defense puroses.

Trump: I would like you to do us a favor though...


And Donald goes on to describe how they are supposed to look into Biden.

He also described how Ukraine was supposed to work with Rudy Giuliani.


1) What is Rudy Giuliani's position at the State Department?

2) All of the key U.S. players were operating rogue, en masse, you would have us believe. And yet right in this call we have U.S. #1, Donald, directly telling Zelensky that the aid was contingent upon him doing something.

"I would like you to do us a favor though."



Do you like being a major idiot for Donald Trump?

This is good for you?

It is your calling?
You dare call into question the integrity of the attorney general?

Cory Booker and Kamala Harris tried to set a perjury trap for Barr.
But Barr is a Yale man.
Skull and cross bones.
Booker and Harris are two gutter rats next to the Yale man.
He spat those two street punks out like chewing tobacco.

You're not too bright. A real corrupt attorney general like loretta lynch got a pass from a hack like you.
Yet you dare question a powerful Yale man like Barr?
He's a powerful man who could knock a low IQ cocksucker like you into oblivion with just one of his ivy league farts.

Rudy Giuliani? He's also above reproach.
Your barking up the wrong tree little pencil neck.
You're a puppet who follows corrupt creeps like Schiff and Pelosi because you lack critical thinking.

Like kierland and screw, you've become a gullible easily manipulated punk ass bitch for the corrupt left wing socialists.

88 and myself laugh at you low IQ cocksuckers.
How many times is Donald j. Trump gonna beat the fuckin shit out of you left wing retards?

He's been sodomizing you low IQ faggotts ever since he famously came down the escalator to announce his candidacy.
User avatar
Softball Bat
Eternal Scobode
Posts: 10903
Joined: Sun Jul 02, 2017 5:02 am

Re: Ambassador Sondland

Post by Softball Bat »

fucktard wrote:A real corrupt attorney general like loretta lynch got a pass from a hack like you.
Link?





#fucktard
Image
88 wrote:I have no idea who Weaselberg is
User avatar
Screw_Michigan
Angry Snowflake
Posts: 21094
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 2:37 am
Location: 20011

Re: Ambassador Sondland

Post by Screw_Michigan »

Just more spin and deflection from 88braincells and his inbred brother Eat a Penis. But but but what about _________?

You pathetic hacks.
kcdave wrote: Sat Sep 09, 2023 8:05 am
I was actually going to to join in the best bets activity here at good ole T1B...The guy that runs that contest is a fucking prick
Derron wrote: Sat Oct 03, 2020 3:07 pm
You are truly one of the worst pieces of shit to ever post on this board. Start giving up your paycheck for reparations now and then you can shut the fuck up about your racist blasts.
EAP
Mr. USA
Posts: 4431
Joined: Sat Oct 26, 2019 7:54 pm

Re: Ambassador Sondland

Post by EAP »

Kierland wrote: Thu Nov 21, 2019 4:49 am Blah blah blah a lot.
Don’t discuss the testimony.
Trust the process.

Sin,
88ovens
I did discuss the testimony you dick cheese lover. I started the GOT DAMM thread for just that reason you jizz connoisseur.

Ambassador Sondland gave us a ^presumption".
Tell me counselor, how much weight do presumptions carry in your court? And be honest or I'll charge you with contempt of this board.
EAP
Mr. USA
Posts: 4431
Joined: Sat Oct 26, 2019 7:54 pm

Re: Ambassador Sondland

Post by EAP »

Softball Bat wrote: Thu Nov 21, 2019 11:23 am
fucktard wrote:A real corrupt attorney general like loretta lynch got a pass from a hack like you.
Link?





#fucktard
Oh, a link?
Do you have a link of common sense in your hollow skull?

Were you aware that loretta lynch is 30 year close personal friends with bill and Hillary?
Or are you a cheap suit?

Every single attorney has mentioned that hillary Clinton did indeed commit multiple felonies.
However, since her 30 year friend
Was the attorney general of the GOT DAMN United states?
Tell us Mr. Anal highway, what the fuck was gonna happen to her?
Any ideas you honorable cock socket?
Cause the other attorneys and legal experts on this board are all ears.
Explain in great detail, why james Comey would dare cross his boss Loretta lynch.
James Comey the pencil neck pussy who limply shook the DON'S hand in the oval office, then proceeded to stab his boss the president in the back.

Link? Links are for winners like 88 and me.
You basement dwellers don't get links, you get owned.
User avatar
Softball Bat
Eternal Scobode
Posts: 10903
Joined: Sun Jul 02, 2017 5:02 am

Re: Ambassador Sondland

Post by Softball Bat »

Where is the link to where I "gave Lynch a pass?"

Sack up or shut up, cum puddle.
Image
88 wrote:I have no idea who Weaselberg is
EAP
Mr. USA
Posts: 4431
Joined: Sat Oct 26, 2019 7:54 pm

Re: Ambassador Sondland

Post by EAP »

Softball Bat wrote: Thu Nov 21, 2019 1:15 pm Where is the link to where I "gave Lynch a pass?"

Sack up or shut up, cum puddle.
Alright.
Show me where you attacked lynch as mercilessly as you attacked Barr.

That alone is link enough.

That struck a chord with me.

You may not have given her a pass. But your shameless wrong headed attack on Barr is unconscionable.

Barr and Durham are above reproach.
No one on this board can touch those two.
Oh, they'll try. Because the legacy of barry boy from Chicago is on the line.

Stay tuned......
User avatar
smackaholic
Walrus Team 6
Posts: 21734
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 2:46 pm
Location: upside it

Re: Ambassador Sondland

Post by smackaholic »

Schifty keeps telling us that all of the Barisma shennanigans were "discredited".

Can someone please explain to me how they were discredited?

All I have heard so far is that there is no evidence that there was corruption.

We have a life long drug addict with no apparent qualifications other than a last name, receiving a rather nice payday from Barisma.

Has there been a congressional investigation into this?

We do know that there was some sort of investigation done by the Ukrainians a few years back, until Joe dropped the hammer on it and then bragged about it on video tape.
mvscal wrote:The only precious metals in a SHTF scenario are lead and brass.
EAP
Mr. USA
Posts: 4431
Joined: Sat Oct 26, 2019 7:54 pm

Re: Ambassador Sondland

Post by EAP »

88 wrote: Thu Nov 21, 2019 2:01 pm
Softball Bat wrote: Thu Nov 21, 2019 7:01 am
.088 wrote:Its the Russian collusion hoax all over again. They say the big scary orange man did something because they feel it. There is no evidence of it. No one actually heard or saw it.
DId you not see Sondland's testimony?

All of the key U.S. players were operating with the understanding that Ukraine needed to make a public announcement of an investigation into Biden or else the congressionally appropriated funds would not be released.

All of these U.S. players were going rogue, en masse, in a direction opposite of what Donald wanted?

This is what you are selling now?

:lol:
You are one of the loons on the board, and I normally do not engage in communication with loons. It is pointless. And it will be again here. But I'll go ahead and respond to your delusional posts.

The testimony from everyone involved is that they did NOT communicate to Ukrainian officials that there was a requirement that Ukraine publicly announce the initiation of a corruption investigation of Joe and Hunter Biden as a precondition to obtaining U.S. financial aid for military purchases and a meeting with the President. Every witness said that it would be improper to do that, and that they would not and did not do it. The evidence shows that Ukraine had no fucking clue that the aid was suspended until September 5, 2019. How can you have a quid pro quo if the party being leveraged in that manner has no fucking clue that the aid is being held up? And the aid hold was lifted on September 11, 2019, despite Ukraine NOT having publicly announced any investigations of the obviously corrupt Bidens. Yes, many witnesses have testified that they presumed or assumed that the President must have intended for there to be a quid pro quo. They made their determinations based on whispers and innuendo flowing in the State Department and other executive branch agencies, which are filled with anti-Trumpers. But none of them spoke with or heard anything from the President that would substantiate their beliefs in the rumors. No one testified that Trump said these things. The only one who did speak to Trump on the matter, being Ambassador Sondland, was told by the President that there was no quid pro quo, and that all he wanted was for the Ukrainian president to do the right thing and follow through with the things he said during his campaign, one of which was to root out corruption in Ukraine. That would include an investigation of Burisma, which was shoveling millions of dollars to Biden's cocaine-addled and completely unqualified son during a time when Biden's father was in charge of U.S. policy to Ukraine. This is the actual evidence, despite Adam Schiff's efforts to cobble together something different. If you have any evidence that proves the opposite, post it here.

This is exactly the same bullshit that Mueller chased after. Everyone in DC and the press was 100% certain that there was some Russian coordination, collusion, conspiracy etc. with Trump during the 2016 election. After two years and $25M there was absolutely fucking nothing. Zilch. Even the Democrat operatives Mueller hired had to admit in the report that there was no evidence that any U.S. person colluded or conspired with Russia during the 2016 election. Game fucking over.

The press and the administrative state in this country are dangerously awful. They tell President Bush that Iraq has WMD's and get hundreds of thousands of people killed when they are wrong. No apology. In fact, they blame Bush for doing what they said to do. The are almost always wrong. Like you. You countenance this kind of government and press. You are part of the problem. You crave state control, and willingly lap up lies to further your desire to have the state pound everyone down to your despicable level.
I'm literally overflowing with tears of joy and admiration at this post.

I've been around a long time.
This response by 88 is logical, factually perfect and strikes a death blow to everything the democrats are doing.

I'm glad to be on the same board as you
I use a ton of hyperbole and colorful language because my intellect is not at your level.
That's more of a testament to your superiority than to my inferiority, as I'm a pretty smart character.
But you sir, are at a level that none of us are familiar with.
User avatar
Screw_Michigan
Angry Snowflake
Posts: 21094
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 2:37 am
Location: 20011

Re: Ambassador Sondland

Post by Screw_Michigan »

EAP wrote: Thu Nov 21, 2019 2:30 pm I'm literally overflowing with tears of joy and admiration at this post.

I've been around a long time.
This response by 88 is logical, factually perfect and strikes a death blow to everything the democrats are doing.

I'm glad to be on the same board as you
I use a ton of hyperbole and colorful language because my intellect is not at your level.
That's more of a testament to your superiority than to my inferiority, as I'm a pretty smart character.
But you sir, are at a level that none of us are familiar with.
Are you able to make a post at this board without blowing 88braincells? You are pitiful.
kcdave wrote: Sat Sep 09, 2023 8:05 am
I was actually going to to join in the best bets activity here at good ole T1B...The guy that runs that contest is a fucking prick
Derron wrote: Sat Oct 03, 2020 3:07 pm
You are truly one of the worst pieces of shit to ever post on this board. Start giving up your paycheck for reparations now and then you can shut the fuck up about your racist blasts.
User avatar
smackaholic
Walrus Team 6
Posts: 21734
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 2:46 pm
Location: upside it

Re: Ambassador Sondland

Post by smackaholic »

Alright, who let 88's mom register the EAP troll?
mvscal wrote:The only precious metals in a SHTF scenario are lead and brass.
User avatar
Screw_Michigan
Angry Snowflake
Posts: 21094
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 2:37 am
Location: 20011

Re: Ambassador Sondland

Post by Screw_Michigan »

smackaholic wrote: Thu Nov 21, 2019 2:44 pm Alright, who let 88's mom register the EAP troll?
Lol, thank you.
kcdave wrote: Sat Sep 09, 2023 8:05 am
I was actually going to to join in the best bets activity here at good ole T1B...The guy that runs that contest is a fucking prick
Derron wrote: Sat Oct 03, 2020 3:07 pm
You are truly one of the worst pieces of shit to ever post on this board. Start giving up your paycheck for reparations now and then you can shut the fuck up about your racist blasts.
EAP
Mr. USA
Posts: 4431
Joined: Sat Oct 26, 2019 7:54 pm

Re: Ambassador Sondland

Post by EAP »

Screw_Michigan wrote: Thu Nov 21, 2019 2:41 pm
EAP wrote: Thu Nov 21, 2019 2:30 pm I'm literally overflowing with tears of joy and admiration at this post.

I've been around a long time.
This response by 88 is logical, factually perfect and strikes a death blow to everything the democrats are doing.

I'm glad to be on the same board as you
I use a ton of hyperbole and colorful language because my intellect is not at your level.
That's more of a testament to your superiority than to my inferiority, as I'm a pretty smart character.
But you sir, are at a level that none of us are familiar with.
Are you able to make a post at this board without blowing 88braincells? You are pitiful.
Screw? Can we talk honestly for just one millisecond?
Man to man?
You gotta admit,
That last post by 88 was a work of art. It belongs in the Louvre.

If you can be honest about that?
It will restore my faith in not only this board, but humanity as a whole.
Kierland

Re: Ambassador Sondland

Post by Kierland »

88nazis,
A) No one testified they talked to Drump because most all of the people talking to Drump won’t testify.
B) The call where Drump says no QPQ is after the whistle blower complaint was made public.
C) The money was released after the whistle was blown.
D) President Z knew the money was being held up and still didn’t announce the investigation because he knew that was wrong and has more integrity than your orange leader.
E) Every witness said it was improper to ask for a QPQ and yet Cheetolini did it anyways.
F) You guys had 2 years unencumbered to look into Biden and you didn’t just like you had two years to fund a wall and you didn’t. Why? Because you don’t really want a wall or an investigation, you just want to bitch about them.
User avatar
Screw_Michigan
Angry Snowflake
Posts: 21094
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 2:37 am
Location: 20011

Re: Ambassador Sondland

Post by Screw_Michigan »

No, they really want a wall. They're just too fucking stupid to realize they can never accomplish it.
kcdave wrote: Sat Sep 09, 2023 8:05 am
I was actually going to to join in the best bets activity here at good ole T1B...The guy that runs that contest is a fucking prick
Derron wrote: Sat Oct 03, 2020 3:07 pm
You are truly one of the worst pieces of shit to ever post on this board. Start giving up your paycheck for reparations now and then you can shut the fuck up about your racist blasts.
Innocent Bystander
Mercia Furst
Posts: 4689
Joined: Wed Oct 19, 2016 8:41 pm

Re: Ambassador Sondland

Post by Innocent Bystander »

EAP wrote: Thu Nov 21, 2019 3:37 am You are too young and stupid to remember 84.
Reagan took the entire country when the dems put up a left wing weirdo.
Should be printed in bold. Dovetails precisely with Smackaholic's new thread analyzing the remaining candidate's after the debate.

Kierland is no spring chicken, he's just been through some shit.
BSmack
2005 and 2010 JFFL Champion
Posts: 29350
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 2:21 pm
Location: Lookin for tards

Re: Ambassador Sondland

Post by BSmack »

Innocent Bystander wrote:
BSmack wrote: Wed Nov 20, 2019 2:37 pm You're saying the President of the United States would threaten harm to a member of a witness's family? Even Trump supporters believe him to be a criminal.
Nah, he's saying expect Sondland to disappoint observers who want him to spill his guts snitching. Since that didn't happen, now what?
Hey I wasn't the one who made the Frankie Pentangeli reference, that was Troll McTrollface over there. But if you're making the Frankie Pentangeli connection then that would have meant Trump holding a member of the ambassador's family hostage until the ambassador recanted his testimony. I'm assuming you did watch The Godfather Part 2?
"Once upon a time, dinosaurs didn't have families. They lived in the woods and ate their children. It was a golden age."

—Earl Sinclair

"I do have respect for authority even though I throw jelly dicks at them.

- Antonio Brown
User avatar
Screw_Michigan
Angry Snowflake
Posts: 21094
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 2:37 am
Location: 20011

Re: Ambassador Sondland

Post by Screw_Michigan »

Holmes: "Amb. Sondland told the President he should let A$AP Rocky get sentenced, then play the 'race card' and give him a ticker tape parade when he gets home....you can tell the Kardashians you tried."

Sounds like a scheme that a blithering idiot like 88braincells or Eat a Penis would concoct.
kcdave wrote: Sat Sep 09, 2023 8:05 am
I was actually going to to join in the best bets activity here at good ole T1B...The guy that runs that contest is a fucking prick
Derron wrote: Sat Oct 03, 2020 3:07 pm
You are truly one of the worst pieces of shit to ever post on this board. Start giving up your paycheck for reparations now and then you can shut the fuck up about your racist blasts.
User avatar
Derron
Eternal Scobode
Posts: 7644
Joined: Sun Jan 16, 2005 5:28 pm
Location: Pacific Northwest

Re: Ambassador Sondland

Post by Derron »

Screw_Michigan wrote: Thu Nov 21, 2019 2:19 am
70% of voters believe Trump violated his oath of office.
You got a link to back that up or is this just the usual dripping with shit take you pull out of your TDS reamed asshole ?
He's guaranteed to get impeached and the Senate won't convict, but every single GOP senator who votes against conviction who is up for election in the next two years is going to be voted from office.
Channeling poptard much ?? Calling your shots..want to put a date on that or you just hoping you can coat tail poptards total market collapse by Christmas predictions ?
It's going to be a total GOP bloodbath if the Senate doesn't vote to impeach Trump. America is sick and tired of the Trump organized crime syndicate and it's especially tired of Trump's whores who say "how wide" when he whips his cock out, you pathetic sacks of shit.
So the people that voted for Trump are going to or have turned on him ? Not likely. He is going to deliver a good old ass kicking to what ever pathetic socialists loser that the Demorats manage to turn out after they feed on themselves for the next 6 months. Bernie 2020 baby !!
Derron
Screw_Michigan wrote: Democrats are the REAL racists.
Softball Bat wrote: Is your anus quivering?
EAP
Mr. USA
Posts: 4431
Joined: Sat Oct 26, 2019 7:54 pm

Re: Ambassador Sondland

Post by EAP »

Kierland wrote: Thu Nov 21, 2019 3:13 pm 88nazis,
A) No one testified they talked to Drump because most all of the people talking to Drump won’t testify.
B) The call where Drump says no QPQ is after the whistle blower complaint was made public.
C) The money was released after the whistle was blown.
D) President Z knew the money was being held up and still didn’t announce the investigation because he knew that was wrong and has more integrity than your orange leader.
E) Every witness said it was improper to ask for a QPQ and yet Cheetolini did it anyways.
F) You guys had 2 years unencumbered to look into Biden and you didn’t just like you had two years to fund a wall and you didn’t. Why? Because you don’t really want a wall or an investigation, you just want to bitch about them.
A,
They won't testify?
Is that a "godfather" thing?
Is that what your implying?
EAP
Mr. USA
Posts: 4431
Joined: Sat Oct 26, 2019 7:54 pm

Re: Ambassador Sondland

Post by EAP »

Screw_Michigan wrote: Thu Nov 21, 2019 3:33 pm No, they really want a wall. They're just too fucking stupid to realize they can never accomplish it.
Trump can accomplish ANYTHING, given enough time and normal human beings across the aisle willing to compromise with him.
There's a concept.
User avatar
Screw_Michigan
Angry Snowflake
Posts: 21094
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 2:37 am
Location: 20011

Re: Ambassador Sondland

Post by Screw_Michigan »

Paging Softball Bat!

https://www.propublica.org/article/pros ... eisselberg
Prosecutors Investigating the Trump Organization Zero In on Trump CFO Allen Weisselberg

Weisselberg is one of the Trump Organization’s longest tenured employees and is now co-running the business. He escaped federal prosecution for the Stormy Daniels payments but is now a focus of an investigation by Manhattan’s district attorney.


Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus Vance Jr.’s criminal investigation of the Trump Organization is scrutinizing the actions of one of the president’s oldest and most trusted deputies, ProPublica has learned.

The focus on Trump Organization CFO Allen Weisselberg, a 72-year-old accountant now running the business with Trump’s two adult sons, stems from his involvement in arranging a payment to porn actress Stormy Daniels in exchange for her silence about an alleged sexual encounter with Trump (which Trump has denied).

Federal prosecutors from the Southern District of New York, or SDNY, contended that the Trump Organization had improperly booked reimbursements for the hush-money scheme as “legal expenses,” with the aid of sham invoices. They granted legal immunity to Weisselberg and later closed their 18-month investigation with the guilty plea of one Trump associate, Michael Cohen. But Weisselberg’s immunity deal applied only to federal proceedings.

Now Vance’s state grand jury is examining whether Weisselberg, among others — and even the Trump Organization — should face state criminal charges for falsification of business records, according to a source familiar with the investigation. Neither Weisselberg nor the Trump Organization responded to requests for comment. Vance, through a spokesman, declined to comment.

A handful of lawyers and investigators from Vance’s office, led by Chris Conroy, chief of the DA’s major economic crimes bureau, traveled to the federal minimum-security prison camp in Otisville, New York, on Oct. 30 to meet for the third time with Cohen, who is serving a three-year prison sentence, according to two sources knowledgeable about the matter.
kcdave wrote: Sat Sep 09, 2023 8:05 am
I was actually going to to join in the best bets activity here at good ole T1B...The guy that runs that contest is a fucking prick
Derron wrote: Sat Oct 03, 2020 3:07 pm
You are truly one of the worst pieces of shit to ever post on this board. Start giving up your paycheck for reparations now and then you can shut the fuck up about your racist blasts.
EAP
Mr. USA
Posts: 4431
Joined: Sat Oct 26, 2019 7:54 pm

Re: Ambassador Sondland

Post by EAP »

smackaholic wrote: Thu Nov 21, 2019 2:30 pm Schifty keeps telling us that all of the Barisma shennanigans were "discredited".

Can someone please explain to me how they were discredited?

All I have heard so far is that there is no evidence that there was corruption.

We have a life long drug addict with no apparent qualifications other than a last name, receiving a rather nice payday from Barisma.

Has there been a congressional investigation into this?

We do know that there was some sort of investigation done by the Ukrainians a few years back, until Joe dropped the hammer on it and then bragged about it on video tape.
Smack?
Your take encapsulates everything that's corrupt about the Democrat socialists.
You hit the nail squarely on the head buddy!
Let's see if kierland or screw can give an honest response to what you just laid out.

They can't.
EAP
Mr. USA
Posts: 4431
Joined: Sat Oct 26, 2019 7:54 pm

Re: Ambassador Sondland

Post by EAP »

Screw_Michigan wrote: Thu Nov 21, 2019 5:22 pm Paging Softball Bat!

https://www.propublica.org/article/pros ... eisselberg
Prosecutors Investigating the Trump Organization Zero In on Trump CFO Allen Weisselberg

Weisselberg is one of the Trump Organization’s longest tenured employees and is now co-running the business. He escaped federal prosecution for the Stormy Daniels payments but is now a focus of an investigation by Manhattan’s district attorney.


Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus Vance Jr.’s criminal investigation of the Trump Organization is scrutinizing the actions of one of the president’s oldest and most trusted deputies, ProPublica has learned.

The focus on Trump Organization CFO Allen Weisselberg, a 72-year-old accountant now running the business with Trump’s two adult sons, stems from his involvement in arranging a payment to porn actress Stormy Daniels in exchange for her silence about an alleged sexual encounter with Trump (which Trump has denied).

Federal prosecutors from the Southern District of New York, or SDNY, contended that the Trump Organization had improperly booked reimbursements for the hush-money scheme as “legal expenses,” with the aid of sham invoices. They granted legal immunity to Weisselberg and later closed their 18-month investigation with the guilty plea of one Trump associate, Michael Cohen. But Weisselberg’s immunity deal applied only to federal proceedings.

Now Vance’s state grand jury is examining whether Weisselberg, among others — and even the Trump Organization — should face state criminal charges for falsification of business records, according to a source familiar with the investigation. Neither Weisselberg nor the Trump Organization responded to requests for comment. Vance, through a spokesman, declined to comment.

A handful of lawyers and investigators from Vance’s office, led by Chris Conroy, chief of the DA’s major economic crimes bureau, traveled to the federal minimum-security prison camp in Otisville, New York, on Oct. 30 to meet for the third time with Cohen, who is serving a three-year prison sentence, according to two sources knowledgeable about the matter.
The SDNY is federal you idiot.
Vance Jr. is dangerously close to prosecutorial misconduct.
Barr will have him for breakfast if he continues with his vendetta against this fine decent family.
Are we clear?
Kierland

Re: Ambassador Sondland

Post by Kierland »

smackaholic wrote: Thu Nov 21, 2019 2:30 pm Schifty keeps telling us that all of the Barisma shennanigans were "discredited".

Can someone please explain to me how they were discredited?

All I have heard so far is that there is no evidence that there was corruption.

We have a life long drug addict with no apparent qualifications other than a last name, receiving a rather nice payday from Barisma.

Has there been a congressional investigation into this?

We do know that there was some sort of investigation done by the Ukrainians a few years back, until Joe dropped the hammer on it and then bragged about it on video tape.
You really are a tard. It has been discredited because Cheetolini has been in office for years and he and the FBI have found no evidence other than its shady looking, which it is. No ledger, no tape, no bank records, no testimony, no depositions, no charges.
And Joe dropped the hammer on the guy who wasn’t investigating. How about Rick Perry getting contracts for his friends from Ukrainians over the summer? How is that for whataboutism?
EAP
Mr. USA
Posts: 4431
Joined: Sat Oct 26, 2019 7:54 pm

Re: Ambassador Sondland

Post by EAP »

Kierland wrote: Thu Nov 21, 2019 7:20 pm
smackaholic wrote: Thu Nov 21, 2019 2:30 pm Schifty keeps telling us that all of the Barisma shennanigans were "discredited".

Can someone please explain to me how they were discredited?

All I have heard so far is that there is no evidence that there was corruption.

We have a life long drug addict with no apparent qualifications other than a last name, receiving a rather nice payday from Barisma.

Has there been a congressional investigation into this?

We do know that there was some sort of investigation done by the Ukrainians a few years back, until Joe dropped the hammer on it and then bragged about it on video tape.
You really are a tard. It has been discredited because Cheetolini has been in office for years and he and the FBI have found no evidence other than its shady looking, which it is. No ledger, no tape, no bank records, no testimony, no depositions, no charges.
And Joe dropped the hammer on the guy who wasn’t investigating. How about Rick Perry getting contracts for his friends from Ukrainians over the summer? How is that for whataboutism?
Kierland? You getting nervous?
The IG report coupled with the Barr/Durham investigation, will lead to the long awaited indictments.

These next few months are gonna be a nightmare for you leftists, as you watch in horror the implosion of all you held dear
Kierland

Re: Ambassador Sondland

Post by Kierland »

Blah blah blah.
I’m not a dem you fucking tard, I don’t care how many you take down.
EAP
Mr. USA
Posts: 4431
Joined: Sat Oct 26, 2019 7:54 pm

Re: Ambassador Sondland

Post by EAP »

Kierland wrote: Thu Nov 21, 2019 7:53 pm Blah blah blah.
I’m not a dem you fucking tard, I don’t care how many you take down.
You don't have to be a dem son.
But one way or another, the government control socialists are indeed going down.
Make no mistake about it.
Government control socialists are not compatible with our constitution.
User avatar
Softball Bat
Eternal Scobode
Posts: 10903
Joined: Sun Jul 02, 2017 5:02 am

Re: Ambassador Sondland

Post by Softball Bat »

Moving Sale wrote:A) No one testified they talked to Drump because most all of the people talking to Drump won’t testify.
B) The call where Drump says no QPQ is after the whistle blower complaint was made public.
C) The money was released after the whistle was blown.
Yep.

Minor details.
lol


.088 is apparently willing to sink to the bottom with Donald.

Oh well.
Image
88 wrote:I have no idea who Weaselberg is
User avatar
Softball Bat
Eternal Scobode
Posts: 10903
Joined: Sun Jul 02, 2017 5:02 am

Re: Ambassador Sondland

Post by Softball Bat »

Screw_Michigan wrote: Thu Nov 21, 2019 5:22 pm Paging Softball Bat!

https://www.propublica.org/article/pros ... eisselberg
Prosecutors Investigating the Trump Organization Zero In on Trump CFO Allen Weisselberg

Weisselberg is one of the Trump Organization’s longest tenured employees and is now co-running the business. He escaped federal prosecution for the Stormy Daniels payments but is now a focus of an investigation by Manhattan’s district attorney.


Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus Vance Jr.’s criminal investigation of the Trump Organization is scrutinizing the actions of one of the president’s oldest and most trusted deputies, ProPublica has learned.

The focus on Trump Organization CFO Allen Weisselberg, a 72-year-old accountant now running the business with Trump’s two adult sons, stems from his involvement in arranging a payment to porn actress Stormy Daniels in exchange for her silence about an alleged sexual encounter with Trump (which Trump has denied).

Federal prosecutors from the Southern District of New York, or SDNY, contended that the Trump Organization had improperly booked reimbursements for the hush-money scheme as “legal expenses,” with the aid of sham invoices. They granted legal immunity to Weisselberg and later closed their 18-month investigation with the guilty plea of one Trump associate, Michael Cohen. But Weisselberg’s immunity deal applied only to federal proceedings.

Now Vance’s state grand jury is examining whether Weisselberg, among others — and even the Trump Organization — should face state criminal charges for falsification of business records, according to a source familiar with the investigation. Neither Weisselberg nor the Trump Organization responded to requests for comment. Vance, through a spokesman, declined to comment.

A handful of lawyers and investigators from Vance’s office, led by Chris Conroy, chief of the DA’s major economic crimes bureau, traveled to the federal minimum-security prison camp in Otisville, New York, on Oct. 30 to meet for the third time with Cohen, who is serving a three-year prison sentence, according to two sources knowledgeable about the matter.
I have no idea who Weaselberg is.

- .088



haha!
Image
88 wrote:I have no idea who Weaselberg is
User avatar
smackaholic
Walrus Team 6
Posts: 21734
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 2:46 pm
Location: upside it

Re: Ambassador Sondland

Post by smackaholic »

Kierland wrote: Thu Nov 21, 2019 7:20 pm
smackaholic wrote: Thu Nov 21, 2019 2:30 pm Schifty keeps telling us that all of the Barisma shennanigans were "discredited".

Can someone please explain to me how they were discredited?

All I have heard so far is that there is no evidence that there was corruption.

We have a life long drug addict with no apparent qualifications other than a last name, receiving a rather nice payday from Barisma.

Has there been a congressional investigation into this?

We do know that there was some sort of investigation done by the Ukrainians a few years back, until Joe dropped the hammer on it and then bragged about it on video tape.
You really are a tard. It has been discredited because Cheetolini has been in office for years and he and the FBI have found no evidence other than its shady looking, which it is. No ledger, no tape, no bank records, no testimony, no depositions, no charges.
And Joe dropped the hammer on the guy who wasn’t investigating. How about Rick Perry getting contracts for his friends from Ukrainians over the summer? How is that for whataboutism?
If it can be shown that Perry is using his position there to enrich himself/fliends/family, he should fry......just like the Bidens.
mvscal wrote:The only precious metals in a SHTF scenario are lead and brass.
Kierland

Re: Ambassador Sondland

Post by Kierland »

And same with Don the Con eh?
Or is he an exception?
EAP
Mr. USA
Posts: 4431
Joined: Sat Oct 26, 2019 7:54 pm

Re: Ambassador Sondland

Post by EAP »

Kierland wrote: Thu Nov 21, 2019 11:11 pm And same with Don the Con eh?
Or is he an exception?
He's the DON.
You wouldn't call Vito Corleone a con, would you? Otherwise you'd wind up with a dead horse in your bed.
Post Reply