You're confusing Tucker and Hannity.
Hannity is basically a Trump jizz mop. He was the same way with Bush 15 years ago.
Moderator: Jesus H Christ
88 wrote:I have no idea who Weaselberg is
You're confusing Tucker and Hannity.
mvscal wrote:The only precious metals in a SHTF scenario are lead and brass.
As is you butt buddy Cucker.smackaholic wrote: ↑Sat Mar 11, 2023 2:07 pmYou're confusing Tucker and Hannity.
Hannity is basically a Trump jizz mop. He was the same way with Bush 15 years ago.
9/27/22“Left Seater” wrote:So charges are around the corner?
Screw_Michigan wrote: ↑Fri Apr 05, 2019 4:39 pmUnlike you tards, I actually have functioning tastebuds and a refined pallet.
Yeah we know....D-Day...Pearl Harbor....9/11.....Jan 6.....all the same.
C'mon dude, he is going with the "it wouldn't have mattered anyway" position. I'm sure it's taught somewhere in lawyer school and prolly has a cool latin name.
mvscal wrote:The only precious metals in a SHTF scenario are lead and brass.
I always thought "sole" meant one. I was unaware it can be as many as 8 or 9.
mvscal wrote:The only precious metals in a SHTF scenario are lead and brass.
Are you implying that Nancy withheld evidence from the prosecution?Kierland wrote: ↑Sat Mar 11, 2023 3:10 pm Just because the defense didn’t get them and some government agency somewhere has them doesn’t make them Brady material.
Again, for the tenth time, how do you know the prosecution had these?
And again, how is vid of after he had completed his crime exculpatory?
mvscal wrote:The only precious metals in a SHTF scenario are lead and brass.
You mean Cuck Carlson's video, and his stupid commentary, riled up the Dump knee-pad crew, but was not grounded in REALITY?
88 wrote:I have no idea who Weaselberg is
The actual video was not "grounded in REALITY"? Who are we supposed to believe? A piece of paper or our lying eyes?Softball Bat wrote: ↑Tue Mar 14, 2023 1:54 amYou mean Cuck Carlson's video, and his stupid commentary, riled up the Dump knee-pad crew, but was not grounded in REALITY?
Who knew?
Screw_Michigan wrote: ↑Fri Apr 05, 2019 4:39 pmUnlike you tards, I actually have functioning tastebuds and a refined pallet.
The video he aired did not show all of Chansley's movements and actions that day.
88 wrote:I have no idea who Weaselberg is
The problem with that is YOU don't know the "full story." The blatant dishonesty and totally unethical and possibly illegal behavior of the prosecution in these cases is enough to question the entirety of "the narrative."Softball Bat wrote: ↑Tue Mar 14, 2023 3:39 amThe video he aired did not show all of Chansley's movements and actions that day.
Cuck aired portions of Chansley's movements and actions that he determined would bolster his agenda, and added commentary to it.
Low IQ lemmings predictably got their panties bunched over it.
Cuck Carlson, who is the upper echelon of media turds, accomplished his mission.
This is very basic stuff here.
If you want to understand any story, you have to know the full story.
If you take a small portion of a full story and then put a deceptive narrative to it, it is not grounded in reality.
Screw_Michigan wrote: ↑Fri Apr 05, 2019 4:39 pmUnlike you tards, I actually have functioning tastebuds and a refined pallet.
He wasn't convicted for "breaking something" or "hurting someone."mvscal wrote:Buffalo guy who broke nothing, hurt no one and just wandered around looking for a photo op.
88 wrote:I have no idea who Weaselberg is
Screw_Michigan wrote: ↑Fri Apr 05, 2019 4:39 pmUnlike you tards, I actually have functioning tastebuds and a refined pallet.
Complains about lying while lying. Great job pedokkkal.mvscal wrote: ↑Tue Mar 14, 2023 1:59 pmThe problem with that is YOU don't know the "full story." The blatant dishonesty and totally unethical and possibly illegal behavior of the prosecution in these cases is enough to question the entirety of "the narrative."Softball Bat wrote: ↑Tue Mar 14, 2023 3:39 amThe video he aired did not show all of Chansley's movements and actions that day.
Cuck aired portions of Chansley's movements and actions that he determined would bolster his agenda, and added commentary to it.
Low IQ lemmings predictably got their panties bunched over it.
Cuck Carlson, who is the upper echelon of media turds, accomplished his mission.
This is very basic stuff here.
If you want to understand any story, you have to know the full story.
If you take a small portion of a full story and then put a deceptive narrative to it, it is not grounded in reality.
It's no different than the Covid lies. Yesterday's conspiracy theory is today's fact and nobody is held accountable. Well, except for Buffalo guy who broke nothing, hurt no one and just wandered around looking for a photo op. Yeah, that's worth 4 years in prison. Wake the fuck up.
What coercion? “This is hardly the first time a 15yo girl has been raped, why are you so pissed?”mvscal wrote: ↑Tue Mar 14, 2023 2:19 pm Coerced confessions mean nothing and this is scarcely the first time a Congressional proceeding has been obstructed. I don't recall any four year prison terms being dished out for "obstruction."
Strain mightly and listen for the loud pop. The entire insurrection narrative is pure, 100% total bullshit.
Please explain how the confessions were "coerced."
1) Name the incident where the democratic process of affirming the electoral vote was obstructed,and this is scarcely the first time a Congressional proceeding has been obstructed.
9/27/22“Left Seater” wrote:So charges are around the corner?
9/27/22“Left Seater” wrote:So charges are around the corner?
Buffalo Man was immediately placed in solitary confinement for a couple months. And the authorities knew perfectly well that he had PTSD issues from his years in the military. And thus when finally let out of the barbaric mental abuse that is solitary confinement they threatened him with a much longer sentence than four years. You can be sure the word "treason" was bandied about and all the standard punishments historicallyu associated with that charge. So his descision to plead guilty was basically rendered under torture. It's a disgrace, and the mewling bottom-bitch faggots here who still support his incarceration are really the lowest form of human scum. :!: :!:Diego in Seattle wrote: ↑Tue Mar 14, 2023 6:22 pmPlease explain how the confessions were "coerced."
1) Name the incident where the democratic process of affirming the electoral vote was obstructed,and this is scarcely the first time a Congressional proceeding has been obstructed.
and...
2) "Officer, you can't give me a speeding citation because look at all those other people speeding!"
That always works real well in court....
You are a total psycho and remain a worthless pile of human excrement.mvscal wrote: ↑Tue Mar 14, 2023 2:19 pm Coerced confessions mean nothing and this is scarcely the first time a Congressional proceeding has been obstructed. I don't recall any four year prison terms being dished out for "obstruction."
Strain mightly and listen for the loud pop. The entire insurrection narrative is pure, 100% total bullshit.
Tell us what part of the video that FAUX NEWS aired negates any of this...mvscal wrote: ↑Tue Mar 14, 2023 2:19 pm Coerced confessions mean nothing and this is scarcely the first time a Congressional proceeding has been obstructed. I don't recall any four year prison terms being dished out for "obstruction."
Strain mightly and listen for the loud pop. The entire insurrection narrative is pure, 100% total bullshit.
88 wrote:I have no idea who Weaselberg is
Screw_Michigan wrote: ↑Fri Apr 05, 2019 4:39 pmUnlike you tards, I actually have functioning tastebuds and a refined pallet.