Chiefs melting down?
- War Wagon
- 2010 CFB Pickem Champ
- Posts: 21127
- Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 2:38 pm
- Location: Tiger country
I can't disagree with much of what you posted Choads, and I share many of the same concerns. However I will take exception to your take on Eddie Kennison not being a #1 receiver. He's been the most consistent performer on offense so far and is putting up some really nice numbers. I don't know how much more you expect from him before you'd classify him a top notch receiver, but he's darn sure the best this squad has.
Re: Chiefs melting down?
There are "potentially huge problems," with every team. As of right now, I dont see any real huge problems, except for one. The Chiefs just are an average football team right now. Nothing more, nothing less.DasChoads wrote:but from where I stand I think there are some potentially huge problems with this team.
They looked great, and pretty damned good against NYJ and Oak, both 1-3 teams, that will draft top 10 next year. No way, are the Chiefs as good as they looked against NY and Oak, but thankfully the schedule has a few more teams of that calibur on the schedule.
Chiefs looked horrible at Den, and choked away a sure win, with poor play and poor coaching in the 2nd half against Philly, both 3-1 teams. Philly is a lock for the playoffs, and a legit Superbowl contender. Denver at this point, definately has the looks of a playoff team, minus the opener at Miami. No way are the Chiefs are as bad as they looked against Den and Philly, however, there are a few more teams of THAT calibur on the schedule.
Just taking a peek at the remaining schedule ... :
Wash
@Mia
@SD
Oak
@Buf
@Hou
NE
Den
@Dal
@NYG
SD
Cin
... I see the possibility of "potentially huge problems," getting much worse. RIGHT NOW, at best, I see the Chiefs finishing 10-6, but still with the possibilty of missing the playoffs all together. At worst ..... 4-12, 5-13?
Chiefs need to use the bye, and get their shit together. We all know this year is pretty much it for this group, and if they dont, they had better figure it out in the next week.
DasChoads wrote: Who have the Chiefs gone out and either drafted or taken from free agency of any kind of talent? I don't frankly see anyone.
Not a bad FA pick up for starters.
-----------------
From all I read today, the coaching staff fucked this team up yesterday.
I've got confidence they'll straighten this shit out.
You may have forgotten we're the # 1 offense in the NFL over the last 3 years.
Like I wrote in another thread, If you'd have told me at the start of the season we'd be 2-2 without Roaf and Warfield, I'd have said "Hell, Yea"
Now, the fickle faithful are ready to bury the season beacuse they choked a home game?
Gimme a fuckin break.
If they come out against Washington and look like shit, then I'll worry.
For now, just chill out and realize the season's a marathon, not a 4 game sprint.
Reggie Bartee?DasChoads wrote:I would have managed the guys that clearly didn't perform much better by showing them the door. You can't tell me the money we were paying someone like Sean Barber, Reggie Bartee, Dexter McCleon and Vonnie Holliday paid off. IKC Scott wrote:What would you have done last off season?
Throw big $$$ at Moose Muhammed rather than Kendrell Bell, Surtain or Knight?
Dude, we were the # 2 offense last season.
You put bandages were the bleeding is.
William Bartee was a draft pick. Holliday was a bust. Barber has been hurt and McCleon has been up and down as a nickle back now forced to start. Point is, nobody bitched when we signed 'em. When we signed 'em it's the fans going "yea, damn..... Sean Barber was the top rated LB available".
Point is, not many FA ever do better with their new team, than their old ones. Aside from Priest, I can't think of any...... but I can think of a shitload that did much worse. Remember, this is free agents were talking about and not trades. Think the Jets pass D is better with a hobbling Lawyer Malloy? How bout the Vikes with Fred Smoot?
The real problem in guessing wrong is you still have to pro-rate that signing bonus and that's even tougher when you want to cut them, beacuse you eat that full hit that season.
If you wanna point out a huge deficiency in the Chiefs, point no further than the draft. That's where the real fuck ups have occurred and where we've missed out on some dudes that could have really helped at WR.
Just stay cool, there's only one dominant looking team I've seen play so far this season, and they seem to have had a few post season issues.
- War Wagon
- 2010 CFB Pickem Champ
- Posts: 21127
- Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 2:38 pm
- Location: Tiger country
Eddie Kennison is on pace for 1400 receiving yards this season. The benchmark for a solid WR is amassing 1000 per year, so yeah, I'd say he's close to being a Pro Bowl candidate, especially if he can score more TD's. Not bad, considering we picked him up on the cheap to begin withDasChoads wrote: Has Kennison grown into being either a pro-bowler, or even close to being a pro-bowler?
Yeah, hindsight is always 20/20, ain't it? I suppose if YOU were in charge, we'd have Pro Bowl players at every position on both offense and defense...salary cap be damned.Wrong decisions at the wrong time about the wrong guys.
- ChargerMike
- 2007/2011 JFFL champ
- Posts: 5647
- Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 6:26 pm
- Location: So.Cal.
- DallasFanatic
- Nobody's Punk
- Posts: 2112
- Joined: Tue Jan 18, 2005 6:37 pm
- Location: Rancho Cucamonga, CA
Re: Chiefs melting down?
You'll be thankful to know that your team will never, and I mean never, finish with a 5-13 record with the current NFL schedule.kcdave wrote: At worst ..... 4-12, 5-13?
Re: Chiefs melting down?
Don't mind Dave... he used to be good at math until he had to start counting on his fingers and toes the number of domestic beatings he received... only to find out that he was in a body cast and could no longer see either his fingers or his toes.DallasFanatic wrote:You'll be thankful to know that your team will never, and I mean never, finish with a 5-13 record with the current NFL schedule.kcdave wrote: At worst ..... 4-12, 5-13?
Nope. Not dead.
-
- 2014 JFFL Champion
- Posts: 4553
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 1:59 pm
Re: Chiefs melting down?
KC Paul 3.0 wrote:
There was AT LEAST three plays that I saw yesterday where Pat Surtain knocked T.O. on his FUCKING ASS at the line of scrimmage
Were you at the game? Any CB that is knocking TO on his ass that much must be doing a bang up job. Explain the 11 times he didn't?
Re: Chiefs melting down?
The Chiefs played a zone defense a great portion of the game. Don't think Surtain is responsible for all 11. McNabb had all day to throw and the WR's had plenty of time to find the hole in the zone. Chalk most of those receptions up to the D-line getting no pressure on the QB.jiminphilly wrote: Explain the 11 times he didn't?
-
- 2014 JFFL Champion
- Posts: 4553
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 1:59 pm
Re: Chiefs melting down?
I'm not questioning the defense or lack of the chiefs played.. I question Paul saying TO was knocked down at the LOS at least 3 times by Surtain. If it was Freddie Mitchell or even Greg Lewis I might believe it.. but not TO.Nixhex wrote:The Chiefs played a zone defense a great portion of the game. Don't think Surtain is responsible for all 11. McNabb had all day to throw and the WR's had plenty of time to find the hole in the zone. Chalk most of those receptions up to the D-line getting no pressre on the QB.jiminphilly wrote: Explain the 11 times he didn't?
Re: Chiefs melting down?
Ok but your post sounded like you were holding Surtain responsible for TO's 11 receptions. I didn't notice Surtain knocking TO on his ass at any point but that's not to say it didn't happen. Bottom line is TO molested the Chiefs defense. Nothing more, nothing less.jiminphilly wrote:I'm not questioning the defense or lack of the chiefs played.. I question Paul saying TO was knocked down at the LOS at least 3 times by Surtain. If it was Freddie Mitchell or even Greg Lewis I might believe it.. but not TO.Nixhex wrote:The Chiefs played a zone defense a great portion of the game. Don't think Surtain is responsible for all 11. McNabb had all day to throw and the WR's had plenty of time to find the hole in the zone. Chalk most of those receptions up to the D-line getting no pressre on the QB.jiminphilly wrote: Explain the 11 times he didn't?
- ChargerMike
- 2007/2011 JFFL champ
- Posts: 5647
- Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 6:26 pm
- Location: So.Cal.
Re: Chiefs melting down?
In that same breath, said sideline reporter (Bob Gretz) also said that the referees could have easily called it holding, and Len Dawson, from the booth, was surprised that it wasn't called holding.KC Paul 3.0 wrote:Hell, the sideline reporter on the Chiefs Radio Network even said that Surtain shut down T.O. at the line of scrimmage so badly on a couple of plays that T.O. cried like a little bitch to the refs about being HELD.
Nope. Not dead.
- Degenerate
- Eternal Scobode
- Posts: 1446
- Joined: Mon Jun 20, 2005 3:05 pm
- Location: DC
Re: Chiefs melting down?
If Baghdad Bob Gretz says it, it must be true.KC Paul 3.0 wrote:Hell, the sideline reporter on the Chiefs Radio Network even said that Surtain shut down T.O. at the line of scrimmage so badly on a couple of plays that T.O. cried like a little bitch to the refs about being HELD.
The Charger's offense has been rolling and the Chief's hasn't. Regardless, the Charger's GROUP of WRs are not that much better than the Chiefs. I think it's pretty close.ChargerMike wrote:McCardell already has five TDs. which is 3 more than the entire Chiefs squad. May wanna back away from this one Nix, or might I suggest an ejection right about now.
4 of McCardell's td's came against the 22nd and 31st ranked pass defenses. The Chargers are yet to play a top 15 pass defense. It doesn't matter though. It's all opinion and your opinion sucks in my opinion.
They are doing the same shit they've been doing his whole career. If they are doing anything more than someone should be wide fucking open every time he runs a route.mvscal wrote:Oh.....OK.BSmack wrote:Not exactly. He's being ignored.mvscal wrote:He's getting quintiple teamed while Sammie drops the ball.
I guess I can understand how they just forgot about the guy who caught 102 passes last year. I'm sure defenses aren't doing anything special to take him out of the game or anything.
I know one thing that has to change. They aren't allowing Green to audible at the line of scrimmage. This has to change NOW! Complete bullshit. Vermiel is really stinking it up coaching wise so far this season.
- ChargerMike
- 2007/2011 JFFL champ
- Posts: 5647
- Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 6:26 pm
- Location: So.Cal.
Nixhex wrote:The Charger's offense has been rolling and the Chief's hasn't. Regardless, the Charger's GROUP of WRs are not that much better than the Chiefs. I think it's pretty close.ChargerMike wrote:McCardell already has five TDs. which is 3 more than the entire Chiefs squad. May wanna back away from this one Nix, or might I suggest an ejection right about now.
4 of McCardell's td's came against the 22nd and 31st ranked pass defenses. The Chargers are yet to play a top 15 pass defense. It doesn't matter though. It's all opinion and your opinion sucks in my opinion.
So we'll just throw out the stat's :roll: ummk
- ChargerMike
- 2007/2011 JFFL champ
- Posts: 5647
- Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 6:26 pm
- Location: So.Cal.
Bullshit.Nixhex wrote:They aren't allowing Green to audible at the line of scrimmage.
Green can audible. Green has called audibles at the line. He's just not Peyton Manning, in that Green's audibles only change who the hot receiver is on the play, or switch off to a draw play. He doesn't have command of the offense like Manning does, where Manning (and the rest of his receivers) has the knowledge to change the play, the routes that are run, the formation, etc. Even Green has admitted that.
Nope. Not dead.
You are correct. I had heard something on the radio saying he's wasn't allowed to audible at all. On the way home I heard Adam Tiecher set the record straight. I was misinformed. :xJHawkBCD wrote:Bullshit.Nixhex wrote:They aren't allowing Green to audible at the line of scrimmage.
Green can audible. Green has called audibles at the line. He's just not Peyton Manning, in that Green's audibles only change who the hot receiver is on the play, or switch off to a draw play. He doesn't have command of the offense like Manning does, where Manning (and the rest of his receivers) has the knowledge to change the play, the routes that are run, the formation, etc. Even Green has admitted that.