What are your team's offseason needs?
What are your team's offseason needs?
New England has to stop gambling on has-beens and draft or sign at least one corner who can cover. There are a few players in the secondary who are developing nicely but a lot of BB's schemes fell apart this year due to poor coverage downfield. Also, the offensive line looked as bad this year as it has since BB has been in town. Corey Dillon is a little older but who could run effectively if they were met in the backfield or at the line 8 out of 10 times they touched the ball? Brady did well until the Denver game in the divisional at carrying the team but he did most of that getting slammed at or just after he let the ball go.
Discuss. . . . . . . . . . . . .
Discuss. . . . . . . . . . . . .
- Bizzarofelice
- I wanna be a bear
- Posts: 10216
- Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 2:48 pm
Top 5 issues for the Lions...
1. Head coach: Can't think about personnel until this is addressed.
2. Quarterback: Is Harrington going to be here next year or not? It'll depend on the coach.
3. Offensive Line: To re-sign or not re-sign Backus? Draft a tackle with the first pick? Is DeMulling or Kosier the answer at LG?
4. Pass Rusher: Draft Kiawanuka with the 9th pick? They need to get more pressure from the edge.
5. Wide Receiver: Cut or keep Rogers?
1. Head coach: Can't think about personnel until this is addressed.
2. Quarterback: Is Harrington going to be here next year or not? It'll depend on the coach.
3. Offensive Line: To re-sign or not re-sign Backus? Draft a tackle with the first pick? Is DeMulling or Kosier the answer at LG?
4. Pass Rusher: Draft Kiawanuka with the 9th pick? They need to get more pressure from the edge.
5. Wide Receiver: Cut or keep Rogers?
- DallasFanatic
- Nobody's Punk
- Posts: 2112
- Joined: Tue Jan 18, 2005 6:37 pm
- Location: Rancho Cucamonga, CA
- RockyMountainWayz
- Elwood
- Posts: 101
- Joined: Sun Mar 20, 2005 6:31 pm
- Location: A Mile High in So-Cal
Red wrote:The 32nd pick.
No Doubt!
I'm hearing rumors of T.O. playing in the Mile High City.
I think that would be HUGE, providing they sign him to a contract with a TO clause letting them DUMP him the first sign of attitude.
Denver needs a true big play receiver!
I think it would be worth the gamble.
- Bizzarofelice
- I wanna be a bear
- Posts: 10216
- Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 2:48 pm
Rushville wrote:Indianapolis Colts: T. Martin
![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
I'd like to trade down... and pick up this monster, somewhere in the middle to late 1st round.
![Image](http://img61.imageshack.us/img61/1577/sports11ir.jpg)
#1- Vernon Davis TE, 6'3 250 - has become a complete tight end as he is now an outstanding blocker ... size and speed create matchup problems ... an Iron Terp with the second-highest strength index on the team ... owns school strength records for a tight end in bench (460), power clean (355), vertical jump (40 inches), index (797), squat (685) and 40-yard dash time (4.41) ... all were recorded in spring of 2005. How could you not take him, best player available.
After watching Ben Watson run down Champ Bailey from the other side of the field(one of the most amazing things I've ever seen)... I want a guy just like that!
m2
![Image](http://media.scout.com/media/avatars/2/2/LongboardBEAR.gif)