Your new top15 thread
Moderators: 88BuckeyeGrad, Left Seater, buckeye_in_sc
Your new top15 thread
1. OSU
2. Mich
3. WV
4. Florida
5. Texas
6. Auburn
7. 'ville
8. Tenn
9. Cal
10. USC
11. ND
12. LSU
13. Wiscy
14. Ga Tech.
15. OU
2. Mich
3. WV
4. Florida
5. Texas
6. Auburn
7. 'ville
8. Tenn
9. Cal
10. USC
11. ND
12. LSU
13. Wiscy
14. Ga Tech.
15. OU
You gonna bark all day little doggie or are you gonna bite?
- Terry in Crapchester
- 2012 March Madness Champ
- Posts: 8995
- Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2005 12:56 pm
- Location: Back in the 'burbs
- MuchoBulls
- Tremendous Slouch
- Posts: 5626
- Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 9:00 pm
- Location: Wesley Chapel, FL
-
- Eternal Scobode
- Posts: 21259
- Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 2:35 pm
Re: Your new top15 thread
1. OSU
2. Mich
3. WV
4. Texas
5. Louisville
6. Auburn
7. UF
8. Tenn
9. USC
10. ND
11. LSU
12. Cal
13. Ga Tech
14. Wisconsin
15. Clemson
2. Mich
3. WV
4. Texas
5. Louisville
6. Auburn
7. UF
8. Tenn
9. USC
10. ND
11. LSU
12. Cal
13. Ga Tech
14. Wisconsin
15. Clemson
-
- Eternal Scobode
- Posts: 21259
- Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 2:35 pm
No particular reason, other than simply not being in the mood. Check #'s 3 through 11 in my little rankings there and with the obvious exception of the Texas ringer you'll probably notice a pattern there, in stark relief.MgoBlue-LightSpecial wrote:Van, what's the gag behind you giving WVU, Louisville, Rutgers and Boise props?
I simply gave into the absurdity of the BCS rankings sytem, and there you have it. Just didn't feel like fighting it this AM...
Joe Satriani is a mime, right? - 88
Show me your dicks. - trev
Show me your dicks. - trev
1- Ohio State
2- Michigan
3- Florida
4- Tennessee
5- West Virginia
6- Texas
7- Auburn
8- California
9- Louisville
10- USC
11- Rutgers
12- Notre Dame
13- Arkansas
14- Wisconsin
15- LSU
2- Michigan
3- Florida
4- Tennessee
5- West Virginia
6- Texas
7- Auburn
8- California
9- Louisville
10- USC
11- Rutgers
12- Notre Dame
13- Arkansas
14- Wisconsin
15- LSU
"Our staff is going to ensure that anyone who attends this University and wears the Indiana uniform will make this privilege among their highest priorities and not treat the opportunity as an entitlement,'' Crean said in a statement. "We fully expect our student-athletes to accept the responsibilities academically, athletically and socially that come with representing one of the top programs in college basketball history."
- Vito Corleone
- Eternal Scobode
- Posts: 2413
- Joined: Tue Jan 18, 2005 2:55 am
-
- Eternal Scobode
- Posts: 21259
- Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 2:35 pm
That was a tough one for me.
But I just think from top-to-bottom, Auburn's resume is more impressive. Plus, outside of the Auburn win, Arkansas hasn't beaten anybody.
I just really like how Auburn has two wins over top 10 teams (Florida and a then #6 LSU...and yes, I consider the "at the time" ranking legitimate until the season is over, and we're able to look back at how everybody finished). I don't believe anyone else in CF can boast such a feat.
Hey, if Arkansas was ranked higher in the BCS, I wouldn't complain. But if I have to pick on over the other, I'll take Auburn...for now.
But I just think from top-to-bottom, Auburn's resume is more impressive. Plus, outside of the Auburn win, Arkansas hasn't beaten anybody.
I just really like how Auburn has two wins over top 10 teams (Florida and a then #6 LSU...and yes, I consider the "at the time" ranking legitimate until the season is over, and we're able to look back at how everybody finished). I don't believe anyone else in CF can boast such a feat.
Hey, if Arkansas was ranked higher in the BCS, I wouldn't complain. But if I have to pick on over the other, I'll take Auburn...for now.
- montinelevin
- Chiming For Fags
- Posts: 305
- Joined: Thu Oct 12, 2006 3:34 am
I have finished a statistical analysis of the top 14 teams in the BCS poll. I analyzed how each team performed in every stat available at http://www.ncaa.org/stats/footba...lMenu.html against the average of their combined opponents in the opposing stat (i.e. run offense against run defense).
I then ranked the top 14 teams in every available category. I averaged the ranking (in parentheses) and re-ranked them. This could be seen as a ranking of how the top 14 has performed thus far given the strength of schedule they have played. This is the list:
14. Arkansas (11.44)
13. Notre Dame (9.67)
12. Boise St. (9.56)
11. Auburn (8.89)
10. Tennessee (7.89)
9. Louisville (7.78 )
7. West Virginia (7.44)
7. USC (7.44)
6. Rutgers (7.0)
5. Florida (6.67)
4. Texas (6.22)
3. Cal (6.11)
2. Michigan (6.0)
1. Ohio State (2.89)
Obviously there is a clear separation between Ohio St. and everyone else. Also interesting is the relative positions of the Big East teams. Don't be surprised if Rutgers ends up winning the conference title.
No ACC team in the top 14 (BC is #15). Four SEC teams, three Big East teams, two Pac-10 and Big-10 teams, and one each from the Big 12, independent, and WAC.
I then ranked the top 14 teams in every available category. I averaged the ranking (in parentheses) and re-ranked them. This could be seen as a ranking of how the top 14 has performed thus far given the strength of schedule they have played. This is the list:
14. Arkansas (11.44)
13. Notre Dame (9.67)
12. Boise St. (9.56)
11. Auburn (8.89)
10. Tennessee (7.89)
9. Louisville (7.78 )
7. West Virginia (7.44)
7. USC (7.44)
6. Rutgers (7.0)
5. Florida (6.67)
4. Texas (6.22)
3. Cal (6.11)
2. Michigan (6.0)
1. Ohio State (2.89)
Obviously there is a clear separation between Ohio St. and everyone else. Also interesting is the relative positions of the Big East teams. Don't be surprised if Rutgers ends up winning the conference title.
No ACC team in the top 14 (BC is #15). Four SEC teams, three Big East teams, two Pac-10 and Big-10 teams, and one each from the Big 12, independent, and WAC.
-
- Eternal Scobode
- Posts: 21259
- Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 2:35 pm
- montinelevin
- Chiming For Fags
- Posts: 305
- Joined: Thu Oct 12, 2006 3:34 am
More Statistics - I know, I really like stats
I took 2006 stats from all 235 div. 1A and 1AA teams. I ran a regression analysis with win-loss percentage as the dependent variable and with several other stats as predictors. I did not include points for or against because that correlation is obvious.
Stats (not including scoring) that have the highest predictive value (t value) in win-loss percentage:
1. Pass Efficiancy Defense (9.099)
2. Rushing Yards (6.545)
3. Rushing Defense (4.862)
4. Pass Efficiency Rating (4.152)
5. Turnover Margin (3.937)
6. Passing Yards (2.967)
7. Net Punting (2.340)
Remember that pass efficiency ratings include passing touchdowns as part of the formula. That is likely why the predictive significance is high. Obviously scoring has the most significance when predicting wins and losses. I was looking for other predictors.
Stats that had no significant predictive value to win-loss percentage:
Passing Defense (yards)
Penalty yards
Sacks
Tackles for loss
BTW, when you include scoring in the regression the only other significant predictors are Pass Efficiancy Defense and Turnover Margin.
I took 2006 stats from all 235 div. 1A and 1AA teams. I ran a regression analysis with win-loss percentage as the dependent variable and with several other stats as predictors. I did not include points for or against because that correlation is obvious.
Stats (not including scoring) that have the highest predictive value (t value) in win-loss percentage:
1. Pass Efficiancy Defense (9.099)
2. Rushing Yards (6.545)
3. Rushing Defense (4.862)
4. Pass Efficiency Rating (4.152)
5. Turnover Margin (3.937)
6. Passing Yards (2.967)
7. Net Punting (2.340)
Remember that pass efficiency ratings include passing touchdowns as part of the formula. That is likely why the predictive significance is high. Obviously scoring has the most significance when predicting wins and losses. I was looking for other predictors.
Stats that had no significant predictive value to win-loss percentage:
Passing Defense (yards)
Penalty yards
Sacks
Tackles for loss
BTW, when you include scoring in the regression the only other significant predictors are Pass Efficiancy Defense and Turnover Margin.
- Terry in Crapchester
- 2012 March Madness Champ
- Posts: 8995
- Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2005 12:56 pm
- Location: Back in the 'burbs
Of those who have cast votes, here's the breakdown in case anyone is interested, using 15 points for #1, 14 points for #2, etc.
1. Ohio State 150
2. Michigan 140
3. West Virginia 122.5
4. Texas 109
5. Florida 106
6. Louisville 96
7. Auburn 83
8. Tennessee 70
9. USC 66.5
10. Cal 61
11. Notre Dame 53
12. Rutgers 46
13. Arkansas 40
14. Boise State 19
15. LSU 14
Others receiving votes: Wisconsin 11; Boston College 10; Georgia Tech 5; Clemson 1; Oklahoma 1; Texas A&M 1.
1. Ohio State 150
2. Michigan 140
3. West Virginia 122.5
4. Texas 109
5. Florida 106
6. Louisville 96
7. Auburn 83
8. Tennessee 70
9. USC 66.5
10. Cal 61
11. Notre Dame 53
12. Rutgers 46
13. Arkansas 40
14. Boise State 19
15. LSU 14
Others receiving votes: Wisconsin 11; Boston College 10; Georgia Tech 5; Clemson 1; Oklahoma 1; Texas A&M 1.
War Wagon wrote:The first time I click on one of your youtube links will be the first time.