blah blah blah... umich shouldn't get rematch... blah blah blah... notre dame sucks... blah blah blah... arkansas can blow me... blah blah blah... usc=whores... blah blah blah...
you know, predictable bantar from a coach trying to explain why his team should be bcs #2. the argument against umich is easy to understand, and even support, but then this:
the only way for meyer to defend his rationale re: umich is to claim florida didn't deserve a rematch for the national championship. the present system is mostly determined through voting, so if umich fits the criteria.. although i'll concede he was a bit circumlocutionary when talking about 96."If I'm Ohio State, I go get a bunch of rings picked out and say we won the national championship," Meyer said. "That's not right. That's not right. I think what happened in 1996 (with Florida getting a rematch against Florida State) was a lot different because you didn't have the BCS. You had simply voting at the end, and that was unique. ... This is a completely different era now."