Hey Oregon. Way to represent! You suck.

The Seer · Post by **The Seer** » Fri Dec 22, 2006 4:23 am

nuff said.

quacker backer · Post by **quacker backer** » Fri Dec 22, 2006 6:29 am

thanks

Felix · Post by **Felix** » Fri Dec 22, 2006 3:00 pm

those were the worst looking uni's I've ever seen........and those helmets suck the big one.....

jumpin jeezus they make those old XFL uni's look tame by comparison.....

Mississippi Neck · Post by **Mississippi Neck** » Fri Dec 22, 2006 3:34 pm

I guess you were the three people watching that game last night.

indyfrisco · Post by **indyfrisco** » Fri Dec 22, 2006 3:56 pm

I flipped to see the score was 17-0 and then said "fucked up my pickem" and then went back to watchign The Office rerun of their X-mas special.

Felix · Post by **Felix** » Fri Dec 22, 2006 3:59 pm

Mississippi Neck wrote:I guess you were the three people watching that game last night.

I turned it on to see just how hideous those helmets actually were.......

I wasn't disappointed.....

good God almighty

Dinsdale · Post by **Dinsdale** » Fri Dec 22, 2006 4:32 pm

Anyone who has followed the PAC this year shouldn't have been the slightest bit suprised by that game.

BYU was on a roll going into the game, the Ducks were in a tremendous nosedive, after a hot start.

:bigshocker: that a team that had absolutely sucked for the last month of the season continued to suck during bowl season.

I think you'd be hard pressed to find a Duck fan who isn't questionong Bellotti's ability to take the team to the next level. In the last 10 years, there's been an amazing level of talent coming to Eugene, and Bellotti has two good seasons to show for it. Maybe at this point, Bellotti will take the AD job as a way to gracefully bow out, and stay employed.

Last night was disappointing, but no suprise whatsoever. I could have sworn I saw Jason Fife and Onterrio Smith out there on the field, stinking it up.

Although we did get a preview of next season -- it was fairly well proven last night that Patrick Chung can't play all 4(or 5) secondary positions all by himself. And two guys can't play QB between them. And Jonathan Stewart is still a whiner, despite his amazing talent. Johnny (not the) Franchise might want to grow a pair this winter, since there's some crazy-off-the-hook-badass running backs coming out of U&L high schools this year...a bumper crop of them, actually.

The Seer · Post by **The Seer** » Fri Dec 22, 2006 7:09 pm

Sudden Sam wrote: Look...your team looks like a buncha idiots. Bad enough that they're a crappy team year after year, but lately they gotta dress like clowns

That faux diamond plate pattern on the unis doesn't intimidate opponents?

The only PAC 10 teams I can see winning a bowl game is USC, UCLA, and Oregon St.

FTFY-NC

Q, West Coast Style · Post by **Q, West Coast Style** » Fri Dec 22, 2006 7:32 pm

No need for long takes on this just one word 'll do: Inept.

Vito Corleone · Post by **Vito Corleone** » Fri Dec 22, 2006 11:22 pm

Felix wrote:
Mississippi Neck wrote:I guess you were the three people watching that game last night.
I turned it on to see just how hideous those helmets actually were.......

I wasn't disappointed.....

good God almighty

Is that a tire tread on those uniforms?

Dinsdale · Post by **Dinsdale** » Fri Dec 22, 2006 11:58 pm

Sudden Sam wrote:Bad enough that they're a crappy team year after year, but lately they gotta dress like clowns, too!

While I won't even try and defend Oregon's shitty performance last night, I will adress this bit of complete fucking stupidity --

Uhm...Oregon was 10-2 last year, and finished up with the #12 ranking. They've had a couple of top ten finishes in the BCS era. They won more games than any other PAC10 team in the 90's.

Good rule of thumb -- when you have to use flat-out lies to support your argument...it probably wasn't a very good argument to begin with.

Screw_Michigan · Post by **Screw_Michigan** » Sat Dec 23, 2006 12:27 am

Dinsdale wrote:Good rule of thumb -- when you have to use flat-out lies to support your argument...it probably wasn't a very good argument to begin with.

that's pretty funny coming from the queen of backpedaling.

Louis Cyphre · Post by **Louis Cyphre** » Sat Dec 23, 2006 1:26 am

Vito Corleone wrote:
Felix wrote:
Mississippi Neck wrote:I guess you were the three people watching that game last night.
I turned it on to see just how hideous those helmets actually were.......

I wasn't disappointed.....

good God almighty
Is that a tire tread on those uniforms?

[snicker] I think it suppossed to be steel diamond plate. [/snicker]

Sky · Post by **Sky** » Sat Dec 23, 2006 2:03 am

Yeah Dinsy, that line might be OK from someone else but when you come on here and run your mouth about how good Oregon is and then flaunt this shit we don't have a lot of sympathy.

Maybe you should just stick to the main board where you can run your trolls.

King Crimson · Post by **King Crimson** » Sat Dec 23, 2006 3:04 am

the flame helmets didn't work. Nike better tinker with the stadium lighting/flame....'cause that shit looked really urine piss solid gold helmet all night on the TV. we were rolling our eyes at Denver's venerable Barracuda pub and grill on Capital Hill. pretty deece mushroom and onion burger, fries are so-so.

wihtout some Nike tinker i don't think you'll see the OC chopper flame look again.

Dinsdale · Post by **Dinsdale** » Sat Dec 23, 2006 8:41 pm

Screw_Michigan wrote: that's pretty funny coming from the queen of backpedaling.

Wanna link that up, Hit-and-Run tard?

That's what I thought. That'll go about as well for you as you trying to link up one actual "take" you've ever had on...anything.

Since your fucking stupid, I'll explain something for you -- you won't find any less of a "backpedaller" than myself...always forward, never back. Show me one example to refute this, douche (hint: you can't).

Sky wrote:Yeah Dinsy, that line might be OK from someone else but when you come on here and run your mouth about how good Oregon is and then flaunt this shit we don't have a lot of sympathy.

Where was I looking for "sympathy"?

So, what you're saying, is that when it's going good for my team, I homer it up and talk about how they're the greatest thing since sliced bread, and when it's going bad, I talk about how badly they suck?

Yeah, I guess that makes me a real freak among sports fans, eh? :yeah,that'sarolleyes:

Maybe you should just stick to the main board where you can run your trolls.

There's another one begging for a "link?"

That's some smacktacular shit, right there -- "uhm...errr...uhm....yeah, well....you have trolls."

It's like Gunslinger with a spellcheck.

OT -- I think another thing that's starting to bother Ducks fans, is Bellotti kept his streak alive of never once giving the opponent credit for playing a good game in his entire Oregon tenure. Not once. Have a little class every once in a while, Be-gone-ee. Seems like there's an awful lot of people wanting him to take the AD job lately.

M Club · Post by **M Club** » Tue Dec 26, 2006 5:19 pm

i think oregon's viewed more as a dangerous program who can beat almost any team they play. their problem is belotti, which means they might lose to any team they play as well. classic example is the umich/wazzu stretch in 03. they won agains umich, but the score would've been 498-13 had it not been for stupid coaching decisions, and the next week it was 498-13, though wazzu had the 400+. they have enough talent that a decent coach could make a go of.