Big 12.

Fuck Jim Delany

Moderators: 88BuckeyeGrad, Left Seater, buckeye_in_sc

Post Reply
User avatar
WolverineSteve
2012 CFB Bowl Jeopardy Champ
Posts: 3754
Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 5:13 pm
Location: The D

Re: Big 12.

Post by WolverineSteve »

I will be the first to rack a impartial SEC post. Props for recognizing the depth of the B12 this year and not just blindly spewing SEC propaganda. You sir know your football.
"Gentlemen, it is better to have died as a small boy than to fumble this football."
-John Heisman

"Any street urchin can shout applause in victory, but it takes character to stand fast in defeat. One is noise --- the other, loyalty." Fielding Yost



Go Blue!
User avatar
Adelpiero
Eternal Scobode
Posts: 5208
Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2005 9:23 pm

Re: Big 12.

Post by Adelpiero »

still disappointing how bad nebraska, kst, colorado, and isu are


kansas is winning on soddys legs and arm, they cant run the ball, but the fatman is flat out coaching his ass off for these wins
User avatar
campinfool
2009 PET Champion
Posts: 974
Joined: Fri Sep 23, 2005 2:39 am
Location: TEXAS

Re: Big 12.

Post by campinfool »

No way a short chunky QB in a gimmick offense will beat Texas in Austin. Orakpo and Kindle will intorduce themselves early and often and Colt will have the offense on cruise control by late in the second half.
MgoBlue-LightSpecial
Eternal Scobode
Posts: 21259
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 2:35 pm

Re: Big 12.

Post by MgoBlue-LightSpecial »

Haven't had much of a chance to see Big 12 action this year. I either haven't been around to see the games, or the games have been blacked out here. I do agree that it's probably the strongest conference right now, and I will definitely make a point to watch the MU/Texas game next week. Very intriguing matchup.
User avatar
War Wagon
2010 CFB Pickem Champ
Posts: 21127
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 2:38 pm
Location: Tiger country

Re: Big 12.

Post by War Wagon »

campinfool wrote:No way a short chunky QB in a gimmick offense will beat Texas in Austin. Orakpo and Kindle will intorduce themselves early and often and Colt will have the offense on cruise control by late in the second half.
It's so freaking on.

Don't count on Daniel having two bad games in a row.

Late in the second half, eh? How late?

Rack your qualification.
User avatar
.m2
I swear to god . . .
Posts: 1715
Joined: Tue Feb 26, 2008 11:53 pm
Location: "Baghdad by the Bay"

Re: Big 12.

Post by .m2 »

War Wagon wrote:
campinfool wrote:No way a short chunky QB in a gimmick offense will beat Texas in Austin. Orakpo and Kindle will intorduce themselves early and often and Colt will have the offense on cruise control by late in the second half.
It's so freaking on.

Don't count on Daniel having two bad games in a row.
<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/2ayolhaLMUI&hl ... ram><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/2ayolhaLMUI&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>[/youtube]Image
poptart wrote:Oakland is a shithole.
User avatar
Vito Corleone
Eternal Scobode
Posts: 2413
Joined: Tue Jan 18, 2005 2:55 am

Re: Big 12.

Post by Vito Corleone »

The last time Missouri won in Austin?

1896

That's right 112 years ago.

Just saying.
M Club wrote:I've seen Phantom Holding Calls ruin a 7-5 team's undefeated season.
User avatar
indyfrisco
Pro Bonfire
Posts: 11683
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 1:15 pm

Re: Big 12.

Post by indyfrisco »

^^^ Well then, at least you got THAT going for you. ^^^b

:meds:
Goober McTuber wrote:One last post...
User avatar
indyfrisco
Pro Bonfire
Posts: 11683
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 1:15 pm

Re: Big 12.

Post by indyfrisco »

On a side note...definitely an odd "schedule" t.u. and misery had back then.

12-14-1896 t.u. 0 misery 10 Austin, TX
12-25-1896 t.u. 4 misery 18 Monterrey, Mexico
12-27-1896 t.u. 6 misery 12 Mexico City, Mexico
12-29-1896 t.u. 0 misery 0 Mexico City, Mexico
01-02-1897 t.u. 6 misery 18 Larado, TX
Goober McTuber wrote:One last post...
User avatar
RadioFan
Liberal Media Conspirator
Posts: 7487
Joined: Thu Jan 13, 2005 2:59 am
Location: Tulsa

Re: Big 12.

Post by RadioFan »

http://www.tulsaworld.com/news/article. ... NORM883115

NORMAN — Oklahoma coach Bob Stoops has been a college football playoff opponent, espousing the every-week-is-a-playoff theory that values the regular season.

During his Big 12 teleconference appearance Monday morning, however, Stoops made a telling concession, based on the strength of this year’s Big 12 Conference.

A reporter suggested the Big 12 is so loaded with quality — the Associated Press poll ranks Texas No. 1, Oklahoma No. 4, Texas Tech No. 7, Oklahoma State No. 8, Missouri No. 11 and Kansas No. 16 — that it runs the risk of eliminating itself from national championship contention.

“That is a fair argument for a playoff,” Stoops responded, “that as that does happen, you’ve still got some of the better teams that have beaten each other up and made each other lose still have an opportunity at the end of the year. You do raise a good argument for a playoff.”

Consider the upcoming schedule.

Missouri plays at Texas and Kansas comes to OU this week. OSU travels to Texas and Tech heads to Kansas the following week. Texas plays at Tech Nov. 1, then OSU plays in Lubbock Nov. 8.

Down the stretch, Texas must travel to Kansas, Tech visits OU and Missouri hooks up with KU.

Finally, there’s Bedlam in Stillwater
Nov. 29.

“It would be great if there were only two good teams in the conference, as long as we were one of them,” Jayhawks coach Mark Mangino cracked. “I wouldn’t have a problem with that. Unfortunately, we have a great conference here.”

“I think it is (the strongest) since I’ve been here, top to bottom,” Stoops said. “Is it a good thing? I wish it wasn’t. I guess for our sake, I wish there weren’t as many.”
User avatar
.m2
I swear to god . . .
Posts: 1715
Joined: Tue Feb 26, 2008 11:53 pm
Location: "Baghdad by the Bay"

Re: Big 12.

Post by .m2 »

Papa Willie wrote:Not doing the SEC homer thing, but Big 12 is in the same situation that the SEC is usually in.
.m2 wrote:The bigger question is how in the fuck is Auburn in the Top 25 at all... as the guys on ESPN just stated. This is what those of us who bitch about the SEC's preseason rankings are talking about. Get everyone ranked high, then play patsy teams to maintain ranking, then when the SEC teams lose to each other they can justify it by saying they lost to a highly ranked team... rinse and repeat.



the truth
poptart wrote:Oakland is a shithole.
User avatar
indyfrisco
Pro Bonfire
Posts: 11683
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 1:15 pm

Re: Big 12.

Post by indyfrisco »

My prediction is that the XII will probably get 2 teams into the BCS. When this happenes, the rest of the bowl teams in the XII move up a notch as far as what bowl they probably belong to. Then, the XII gets butfucked in the mouth in the Bowl season and everyone calls them overrated.

This seems to happen every year the XII gets 2 teams in the BCS.
Goober McTuber wrote:One last post...
User avatar
Adelpiero
Eternal Scobode
Posts: 5208
Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2005 9:23 pm

Re: Big 12.

Post by Adelpiero »

Missouri loss plays into OU hands.

They can now back door the BCS bid if they win out.

Unless MU wins the Big12 title game, they will get snubbed for a 1 or even a 2 loss OU team. OSU loss was huge to their bowl bid. Looks like another Cotton Bowl bid.
User avatar
Terry in Crapchester
2012 March Madness Champ
Posts: 8995
Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2005 12:56 pm
Location: Back in the 'burbs

Re: Big 12.

Post by Terry in Crapchester »

IndyFrisco wrote:My prediction is that the XII will probably get 2 teams into the BCS.
Not exactly an out-on-a-limb type prediction this year. The Big XII and the SEC are both virtual locks to get two teams into the BCS this season, as it's a down year for the ACC, Big East, Big Ten and Pac-10. There will be at least one, possibly two, non-BCS teams in the BCS, and the Big Ten might sneak a second team in.
War Wagon wrote:The first time I click on one of your youtube links will be the first time.
Post Reply