Moderator: Jesus H Christ
Pretty much all you've got left now.Feelsdix wrote: you fuckwits are going to trying to get out of the hole you dug for yourself for a long time to come...and to think, you've got GW Bush to thank for it all
I've posted it before, and you obviously didn't watch it then, but I'll post it again in the hopes you might pull your head out of your ass and wake the fuck up.....mvscal wrote:
But seriously, you don't have one single shred of evidence to support that conclusion, yet you will cheerfully bankrupt the country for this snake oil scam...because you are stupid. Morons like you should be stood against a wall and shot and I mean that quite literally.
,He's investing heavily into renewable energy sources
so your saying that Obama is not cutting subsidies to gas and oil companies? if you've got something that disputes that, then by all means present it or shut the fuck upGuess again, fool.
rich people are paying less in taxes as a percentage then they were under Reagan.....do you have a problem with that?What relevance does that have to the conditions we face today?
you're pretty emotionalOh...OK.
Die. Save a tree or a whale and blow your fucking brains out, you stupid, pinheaded cocksucker.
no dude, you forgot, it was all Clinton's fault...fuck you've got a short memoryWar Wagon wrote:
It's all Bushs' fault and no matter what Obama does, it can't be any worse.
mvscal wrote:Morons like you should be stood against a wall and shot and I mean that quite literally.
How long has "science" be documenting it dog ? What it is yo ?Felix wrote:... these types of ice shelf breaks are unprecedented....of course, since science has be documenting it they've never seen the ice shelves receding at the rate they are...
uh, I thought the Texas size chunks were falling of Antartica and the Arctic ones were only the size of Iowa. In either case, I didn't notice nor do I care. Just went thru another cold ass winter and youFelix wrote: I guess ice chunks the size of Texas falling away from the Arctic Ice Shelf are pretty common...
unprecedented? really? You mean like before Jesus walked the Earth?...these types of ice shelf breaks are unprecedented....of course, since science has be documenting it they've never seen the ice shelves receding at the rate they are...but you just keep believing that it's all simply a cycle of nature.....
You mean you're denying Global Warming exists ? Where would you be without Global Warming ?mvscal wrote:
Not exactly a big fan of religion here.
no, it's not ever been seenmvscal wrote:
Yeah, I guess they are.
you didn't watch the videos did you...of course not, you'll never be convinced of what it is you want to believe no matter how much scientific evidence is providedIn our whopping decade or two of studying it? Should I be impressed?
so you choose to get your science from a writer from the Washington Post, that may or may not have any knowledge of what the fuck he's talking about, hasn't submitted his conclusions to scientific peer review, and hasn't published it in a scientific journal....oh, I see where this is going....okay, lets see how many more scientifically reviewed studies you can produce that support this assertion...go ahead and take your time, because you're going to be looking for a long, long time....When all else fails, blantantly lie. Good job, douche. Of course global ice levels are experience a net increase.
flatout, straight-up a baldfaced fucking lie, which if you'd watched the video's you'd know why it's horseshitWhich makes sense because we aren't in a warming period, but are actually in a cooling trend now...
by all means, pull up the scientific peer reviews of the Hadley Centre for Climate Change study, and lets have a look and see what actual scientists have to say about it
I looked high and low for any listing for a Kate Melville, that holds a scientific degree in climatology, nature sciences, etc. a big fat zero....you see, any dipstick (like you) with no scientific background whatsoever can claim anything they want and could probably cull enough "facts" from various places to back up their assertions....but the cold hard fact of the matter is, until a theory has been formalized (such as global warming) and articles have been published in a scientific journal, where they can be reviewed by other scientists to find potential problems or flaws in the conclusions, the paper it's written on is worthless as a scientific study....sorry buddy, that's the way science works...scientific advancement isn't made by shitkickers named Steven Goddard that throw some graphs together, put out some wingnuttia theory and call it good.....if this story has any merit, you should easily be able to find it reprinted in a scientific peer reviewed journal....nor are the oceans showing any signs of this alleged warming.
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/stor ... d=88520025
Goober McTuber wrote:One last post...
Goober McTuber wrote:One last post...
I don't "dismiss" any science nor any supported scientific theory.IndyFrisco wrote:Felix,
Some scientists say that 99+% of global warming comes from seismic activity.
If that's the case, there ain't shit we can do about it. Why is it you choose to have faith in some science while dismissing other science? What science is right?
Personally, I've never heard of any scientist claiming that seismic activity contributes to global warming, but I certainly wouldn't dismiss it....I'd be very interested in reading about the theory...If you or Indy would like to find an article and post it here, I'd love to see it....insofar as what you posted look bud, you provided a bunch of links to what appears to be some dudes opinion, some women's ramblings, and a report prepared by a scientific sounding institute that I have no idea whether that report has been peer reviewed or published in a scientific journal....don't be so fucking hostile, simply present something that has been scrutinized by the scientific community for it's veracitymvscal wrote:
You just did, you lying sack of shit and served it all up with a heaping stack of ad hominem bullshit which did nothing to support your position. You're a fucking tard.
now I know you didn't watch the video links I posted, because if you had, you'd know that in the first one, Al Gore and his rantings were pretty much dismissed summarily....seriously, the videos are on the SCIENTIFIC studies of the global warming debate, not the ramblings uneducated scare mongers like GoreJust out of curiousity, how many peer reviewed studies has algore published and where did he get his degree in climatology.
Goober McTuber wrote:One last post...
thanks for the clarification...I thought I was missing somethingIndyFrisco wrote:Felix,
Once again....wrong choice of words by me.
I meant volcanic activity. Not seismic.
I thought seismic activity was a possible result of it? Hell I don't know. Nor do I care. I don't believe any of that shit anyway. If we were setting off a couple hundred nuclear bombs worldwide each year, maybe...Van wrote:Felix, IIRC, one of your first two video links mentioned seismic activity as a possible factor in climate change. Volcanic change was definitely mentioned.
Goober McTuber wrote:One last post...
Yes you really are a stupid Racist fuckhole that has right about 1% of the time. And that is being generous.mvscal wrote:Really?
so now a cap and trade is going to destroy our economy?mvscal wrote: And we should destroy our economy based on this?!? Are you out of your fucking mind?
Would you prefer cripple? I understand that your intellectual capacity is somewhere between 'bag of hammers' and 'box of rocks', so I will help you out.
Then for the sake of our board, kill yourself.Felix wrote:I'm just one of those types that likes to leave a place in as good (or better) condition than when I got there
That would result in a significant, if transient, spike in greenhouse gases.poptart wrote:Then for the sake of our board, kill yourself.Felix wrote:I'm just one of those types that likes to leave a place in as good (or better) condition than when I got there
Fucking ouch...poptart wrote:Then for the sake of our board, kill yourself.Felix wrote:I'm just one of those types that likes to leave a place in as good (or better) condition than when I got there
pretty "christian" of you bud...go fuck yourselfpoptart wrote: Then for the sake of our board, kill yourself.
You are going to hell if you don't believe in Jesus Christ as your lord and saviormvscal wrote:
How long has 'tart been up in your head, Scott?KC Scott wrote: I sit in judgement of you beacuse of my beliefs.
By defacto standard - I am better than you.
I don't want your repentance, and I don't want your prayerspoptart wrote:Felix can live, I repent.
FTFYmvscal wrote:I love using Coal and Oil, which puts my intellectual capacity somewhere between 'bag of hammers' and 'box of rocks'.
