![popcorn :popcorn:](./images/smilies/smileyvault-popcorn.gif)
Now there's a disturbing flick to be made--"9/11--The Inside Job" Who would play Condi? Whoopi Goldberg?
Here's the starring cast of heinous criminals...what do you think...Ed Asner as Cheney?
![Image](http://www.moscowtopnews.com/image/article/5/0/8/2508.jpeg)
Moderator: Jesus H Christ
File this under the "water is wet" category.Of course I don't roll out any sort of intellectual approach to any subject
Are you capable of discussing anything without nonsensically reverting back to righty/lefty purse swinging, you depthless robot?LTS TRN 2 wrote:Sorry to break up the Fasci "what if" party, but just because you tedious seething right-wing rats are still pissed that you lost WWII doesn't mean you know shit about films, music, literature, history, philosophy, or the taste of trembling poontang, because you obviously don't. You voted for Sarah Palin!!! You are such utterly disgraced piles of melting ice in a urinal, such reused plastic dog-shit bags, such total cowards as to make the Watch Captain look honorable. Why...do you even try? Just stand on your hind legs, pant and wait for a treat!
LTS TRN 2 wrote:Sorry to break up the Fasci "what if" party, but just because you tedious seething right-wing rats are still pissed that you lost WWII doesn't mean you know shit about films, music, literature, history, philosophy, or the taste of trembling poontang, because you obviously don't. You voted for Sarah Palin!!! You are such utterly disgraced piles of melting ice in a urinal, such reused plastic dog-shit bags, such total cowards as to make the Watch Captain look honorable. Why...do you even try? Just stand on your hind legs, pant and wait for a treat!
Screw_Michigan wrote: ↑Fri Apr 05, 2019 4:39 pmUnlike you tards, I actually have functioning tastebuds and a refined pallet.
What do mean "Huh?"..as though you didn't vote for McCain/Palin? Can you even breath without lying? And B-Juice...I mean "Dr. Phibes"...yes Pandorum is good but not disturbing. So who fucking cares? you want disturbing, check out City Of Life And Death, the grim tale of the Japanese devastation of Nanking. now go back to pretending to do do whatever it is you pretend to be.mvscal wrote:LTS TRN 2 wrote:Sorry to break up the Fasci "what if" party, but just because you tedious seething right-wing rats are still pissed that you lost WWII doesn't mean you know shit about films, music, literature, history, philosophy, or the taste of trembling poontang, because you obviously don't. You voted for Sarah Palin!!! You are such utterly disgraced piles of melting ice in a urinal, such reused plastic dog-shit bags, such total cowards as to make the Watch Captain look honorable. Why...do you even try? Just stand on your hind legs, pant and wait for a treat!
Huh?
No, I didn't.LTS TRN 2 wrote:What do mean "Huh?"..as though you didn't vote for McCain/Palin?
Screw_Michigan wrote: ↑Fri Apr 05, 2019 4:39 pmUnlike you tards, I actually have functioning tastebuds and a refined pallet.
No, But someone should piss into LTS's mouth and wash some of that phoney pretentiousness down his throat.Papa Willie wrote:LTS TRN 2 wrote:No. it's not "irony" at all. It's just a sloppy attempt at satire. Don't you know what irony is? Invented by the Greeks of course, irony is a technique of dramatic suspense--either tragic or comic--where the audience knows something the actor doesn't. Your hack explanation is actually worse than your weak-hammed attempt at comedy. Get your act together.
Have you ever pissed in a water fountain and thought "this is just what I want to be"?
War Wagon wrote:The first time I click on one of your youtube links will be the first time.
Joe in PB wrote: Yeah I'm the dumbass
schmick, speaking about Larry Nassar's pubescent and prepubescent victims wrote: They couldn't even kick that doctors ass
Seems they rather just lay there, get fucked and play victim
Meh. Those are all pretty mainstream movies. Nothing wrong with that, but none of them even scratch the surface of truly disturbing violence, torture and depravity compared to other films, like some mentioned in this thread.Terry in Crapchester wrote:Three pages in, and nobody has mentioned any of these?
FTFY.MgoBlue-LightSpecial wrote:Meh. Those are all pretty mainstream movies. Nothing wrong with that, but none of them even scratch the surface of truly disturbing violence, torture and depravity compared to other films, such as any of Toddowen's home movies.
Joe in PB wrote: Yeah I'm the dumbass
schmick, speaking about Larry Nassar's pubescent and prepubescent victims wrote: They couldn't even kick that doctors ass
Seems they rather just lay there, get fucked and play victim
Joe in PB wrote: Yeah I'm the dumbass
schmick, speaking about Larry Nassar's pubescent and prepubescent victims wrote: They couldn't even kick that doctors ass
Seems they rather just lay there, get fucked and play victim
Goober, if you watched "salo", you'd be more than just damaged goods, you would piss and shit in young girls' mouths. AND, you'd partake in their piss and shit with glee in your heart.Goober McTuber wrote:I don't often read bradhusker posts, but when I do, I find sig material.
Sincerely,
I guess I can safely assume that you've not seen the directors cut with the deleted scenes? Certain scenes were cut from the final version of the film, due to the fact that these scenes were so vile and disgusting, that no "civilized" society would tolerate them.LTS TRN 2 wrote:Husker, you're supposed to take the meds, not tape them to your nipples. Did you even see Salo? There are no Nazis in it at all. Those soldiers portrayed are Italian Black Shirt fascists, and the kids are actors, the feces is fake--there's no urine scenes--and the sex is mannered (which means it is implied with the convention that allows the actors to keep their clothes on while apparently having intercourse). The theme of the film is the collaboration of the Italian aristocracy during the war with the Italian Fascists and the overall German Nazi design. The filmmaker assumes the audience is familiar with the writings and philosophy of Marquis De Sade. And except for the fascinating cast of faces--those decadent aristocrats--the film is rather boring as the long speeches are rolled out pretty much in the flat and tedious style of De Sade.
Another actual candidate for this list might be We Have To Talk About Kevin, a disturbing story of a mother (Tilda Swinton) dealing with the aftermath of her (classic Bad Seed) son having committed a high-school massacre (bow and arrow, pep-rally). Excellent troubling subtleties in the mother/son relationship and great acting all around.
Why would I lie? What is there to gain by lying about a sick, vile disgusting film? A film that pretends to have some artistic value, BUT, in reality, is nothing more than kiddie porn.LTS TRN 2 wrote:An absolute lie, there is no "director's cut" You're a disgrace as a comedian.
Another actual candidate for a truly disturbing film is Melancholia, with Wagner never sounding so right (yikes!) and the death of the planet never seeming so natural. A tough sled through the first half, but its trenchant underwater pace is designed to build up the finale.
Good flick, but not disturbing--unless you're a bi-sexual New York SOHO party vamp who can't get laid. I thought the film expressed one actual interesting idea when the scientist who had tracked the UFO to the NYC apartment roof asks the disbelieving kids, "Why..do you suppose they would have to be big?"DELSDAD wrote:I think someone did mention Silence.
Very entertaining thread hijack BTW.
I thought of this one.