Ted Nugent punked by the Army

Derron · Post by **Derron** » Sat Apr 21, 2012 8:29 pm

For speaking his mind..... freedom of speech?

And Obama hangs out with his Demorat homies at $ 40,000 a plate dinners....

http://entertainment.msnbc.msn.com/_new ... ments?lite

smackaholic · Post by **smackaholic** » Sat Apr 21, 2012 9:41 pm

So, writing a song about banging some young honey = pedophile

LTS TRN 2 · Post by **LTS TRN 2** » Sat Apr 21, 2012 10:53 pm

Sounds like Ted's ready for a duet with Hank jr, some bleary paranoid rant with occasional searing cliches on guitar, and of course some huntin' lust--you know, just wanting to roam about with high powered weaponry shooting bears, presidents, Arabs, anything really.

Diego in Seattle · Post by **Diego in Seattle** » Sun Apr 22, 2012 12:25 am

Derron wrote:For speaking his mind..... freedom of speech?

I guess one could say he got Dixie Chick'd. Nice consistant standard, Durron.

And Obama hangs out with his Demorat homies at $ 40,000 a plate dinners....

In his eight years in office Bush only came out to Seattle when he was doing just such a fundraiser. Your point is?

BSmack · Post by **BSmack** » Sun Apr 22, 2012 1:32 am

smackaholic wrote:So, writing a song about banging some young honey = pedophile

No, banging chicks under legal age makes you a pedo.

Derron · Post by **Derron** » Sun Apr 22, 2012 1:39 am

Diego in Seattle wrote: In his eight years in office Bush only came out to Seattle when he was doing just such a fundraiser. Your point is?

That you are a kiddy diddling liberal who loves to suck the liberal cock.

Derron · Post by **Derron** » Sun Apr 22, 2012 1:40 am

BSmack wrote:
smackaholic wrote:So, writing a song about banging some young honey = pedophile

No, banging chicks under legal age makes you a pedo.

So as usual, Jsc is full of shit. But we all knew that.

BSmack · Post by **BSmack** » Sun Apr 22, 2012 1:49 am

Derron wrote:
BSmack wrote:
smackaholic wrote:So, writing a song about banging some young honey = pedophile

No, banging chicks under legal age makes you a pedo.
So as usual, Jsc is full of shit. But we all knew that.

No, Ted Nugent is on record about his pedo ways.

Derron · Post by **Derron** » Sun Apr 22, 2012 3:05 am

BSmack wrote:
No, Ted Nugent is on record about his pedo ways.

Link ? Proof ?

M2 · Post by M2 » Sun Apr 22, 2012 4:05 am

What a surprise Diego showed up in this thread...

M2 · Post by M2 » Sun Apr 22, 2012 5:24 am

Jsc... is basically a drunk whose made bad choices in his life and is now paying for it.

I don't blame the guy... I just feel sorry for him.

Diego in Seattle · Post by **Diego in Seattle** » Sun Apr 22, 2012 3:43 pm

Jsc...I'm with you that Noogent is a tool.

But you might want to vet your witnesses before putting them on the stand.

Derron · Post by **Derron** » Sun Apr 22, 2012 4:05 pm

Jsc810 wrote:You stupid fuck. He admits it.

Link ? Proof ?

Derron · Post by **Derron** » Sun Apr 22, 2012 4:11 pm

Jsc810 wrote:The guy admitted being a pedophile, see the video at the link I posted above.

Or you could see what Courtney Love says:

Howard wanted to do a real interview with Courtney so he tried to calm her down and asked her about her past heroin abuse. She told Howard that she was the last person to lose her virginity in her peer group. She said one of the first times she had oral sex was with Ted Nugent. She said she was young and she didn't want to say exactly how old she was. It was a long time ago and she didn't even have breasts yet. She was only 12 and a half years old back then.
That Nugent is a pedophile isn't really in dispute. Neither is the fact that he is a draft dodger.

So yeah, considering his being a pedophile draft dodger and his recent comments about the Commander in Chief, I understand why the Army doesn't want him.

Right the word of a crack whore..you take that to court much very often esquire ?

I was thinking more along the lines of a criminal conviction that might support your's and the other liberal honks allegations that Ted is a pedophile.

You know, proved and convicted in court ?

mvscal · Post by **mvscal** » Sun Apr 22, 2012 7:51 pm

Yet another irrelevant distraction brought to you by our least favorite dog-eating, Kenyan moron in order to in order to steer the conversation away from his utterly disasterous handling of the economy.

As I said earlier, his campaign will be predicated on a series of irrelevant distractions and they are going start flying fast and furious. Wait...where have I heard fast and furious before? Sounds familiar...hmm, nevermind. HEY!! LOOK EVERYBODY!! TED NUGENT!! GET HIM!!!

No surprise to see the usual dullards here hoodwinked by the horseshit.

mvscal · Post by **mvscal** » Sun Apr 22, 2012 8:47 pm

Just for for the record, pedophiles are attracted to prepubescent children. Isn't that right, diego?

LTS TRN 2 · Post by **LTS TRN 2** » Sun Apr 22, 2012 9:21 pm

Comparing Nugent and the backlash from his stupid comments to the Dixie Chicks and the concerted smear campaign leveled against them is idiotic--and standard Rovian twist-logic. Nugent is an ignorant punk who likes to think big thoughts in tiny spurts, and so concludes drastic nonsense. Just like the right-wing lock-step Tea Baggers around here, btw. As for his being a draft dodger, well this is certainly a good thing which could be said about him if it's true. After all, he was dodging Vietnam, a Nazi-like war crime of massive aggression. But this nonissue exposes another real problem creeping deeper into the national fabric, and that's the constant reference to the president as "my Commander In Chief." Everyone does it routinely, even congressmen like Cantor who hate the president. The president is commander in chief of the military, period. If you're not in the military, he's decidedly NOT your commander in chief. Rather, he works for you. This blanket application of the president's military role is a pernicious angle to promote the Permanent War as a normal state of affairs. Fuck the pentagon--before they fuck you.

Screw_Michigan · Post by **Screw_Michigan** » Sun Apr 22, 2012 10:31 pm

smackaholic wrote:So, writing a song about banging some young honey = pedophile

You consider a 13 year old a "young honey?"

Bizzarofelice · Post by **Bizzarofelice** » Sun Apr 22, 2012 11:26 pm

ted nugent punked by ted nugent

Atomic Punk · Post by **Atomic Punk** » Mon Apr 23, 2012 12:17 am

I used to spend every Summer in Tempe, AZ and I remember way back Terrible Ted played at Compton Terrace (formerly Legend City) owned by Stevie Nicks' father. I think Stevie had a home on Camelback Mtn. The rumor was that Ted also drank a quart of motor oil that screwed him up to get out of the draft. Jay in Phoenix may be able to verify some of this.

Terry in Crapchester · Mon Apr 23, 2012 2:47 pm

Here you go, Derron . . .

http://www.artistfacts.com/detail.php?id=44

Fourth one down.

Oh, and Ted Nugent shit his pants to avoid serving in Vietnam. Of course, I suppose he was going to shit his pants either way. His way, he got out of going to Vietnam. Bode him on that point. I guess.

And Diego was right on point bringing up the Dixie Chicks. Remember, they were pretty much blacklisted, all for saying that they were embarrassed to be from the same state as W. Nugent, OTOH, exhorted a bunch of people, some of whom were probably even crazier than he is, to cut off Obama's head. And all he lost was a single concert on an Army base. Small potatoes, by comparison. And I'm guessing you weren't all that worried about the Dixie Chicks' First Amendment rights.

Derron · Post by **Derron** » Mon Apr 23, 2012 3:29 pm

He had a relationship with a 17-year old Hawaiian girl when he was 30. He became her legal guardian in order to comply with laws regarding relationships with minors.

Not charged or convicted with any crime of course. A 17 year old is still legally a minor by definition of the law, granted. An of course you liberals will take the low road and call her a child, while at that same time most likely you have dropped the hammer on a 17 year old back in the day. Shocking.

But if it works for you position, keep spinning. Take it to court and make it stick if you can. Probably not. Still not enough for the pedophile label to be used here. Just like Clinton was not an adulterer.

Terry in Crapchester · Mon Apr 23, 2012 3:51 pm

Derron wrote:
He had a relationship with a 17-year old Hawaiian girl when he was 30. He became her legal guardian in order to comply with laws regarding relationships with minors.
Not charged or convicted with any crime of course. A 17 year old is still legally a minor by definition of the law, granted. An of course you liberals will take the low road and call her a child, while at that same time most likely you have dropped the hammer on a 17 year old back in the day. Shocking.

But if it works for you position, keep spinning. Take it to court and make it stick if you can. Probably not. Still not enough for the pedophile label to be used here. Just like Clinton was not an adulterer.

Nobody has said that Nugent was ever convicted of child molestation. It's not subject to reasonable dispute, though, that Nugent had "inappropriate relationships" (to use a Clintonian phrase) with underage girls at varying points in his life. And I'm guessing you never had any problem with calling Clinton an adulterer. Or for that matter, a rapist or a murderer.

MgoBlue-LightSpecial · Mon Apr 23, 2012 3:52 pm

I'll give you that one, Derron. Writing about wanting to bang 13 year olds is more fucked up than obtaining legal documents so you can bang 17 year olds. Pedophile? I don't know. Piece of shit? Most certainly.

smackaholic · Post by **smackaholic** » Mon Apr 23, 2012 4:50 pm

If Nugent did nail a 17 year old as a 30 year old, he's not a ped. He is a POS, however, IMO.

But, if we are gonna play morality police and go after a 30 year old rock star for banging a 17 year old groupie, what do you say about a 50 year old POTUS banging an early 20s underling? And then lying under oath about it. And we won't even bother going into JFK's wanderings who make Ted and Willy look like choir boys.

And save me the 17 is not 22, because 30 year old rock star is surely not 50 year old POTUS.

I suspect that all this kiddy diddling being brought up, will cause Nugent's stock to fall in conservative circles, because, that's generally how we roll. Too bad it ain't the case among libs desparate for a hero to hold up.

Terry in Crapchester · Mon Apr 23, 2012 4:58 pm

smackaholic wrote:If Nugent did nail a 17 year old as a 30 year old, he's not a ped. He is a POS, however, IMO.

But, if we are gonna play morality police and go after a 30 year old rock star for banging a 17 year old groupie, what do you say about a 50 year old POTUS banging an early 20s underling? And then lying under oath about it. And we won't even bother going into JFK's wanderings who make Ted and Willy look like choir boys.

And save me the 17 is not 22, because 30 year old rock star is surely not 50 year old POTUS.

To an extent, I agree, but then you go on to . . .

I suspect that all this kiddy diddling being brought up, will cause Nugent's stock to fall in conservative circles, because, that's generally how we roll. Too bad it ain't the case among libs desparate for a hero to hold up.

Was Bill Clinton's conduct appropriate? Certainly not. But was it kiddy diddling? Not by any reasonable definition of that phrase. Like it or not, the law recognizes a 22 year old as a consenting adult.

Goober McTuber · Post by **Goober McTuber** » Mon Apr 23, 2012 5:27 pm

smackaholic wrote:If Nugent did nail a 17 year old as a 30 year old, he's not a ped. He is a POS, however, IMO.

I don’t think the 30-year-old nailing the 17-year-old thing is as bad as the multiple inferences that he was screwing girls under the age of 15.

LTS TRN 2 · Post by **LTS TRN 2** » Mon Apr 23, 2012 5:34 pm

What groupies Nugent pulled--and their respective ages--is not the point at all. Why are you guys stressing on who he fucked in his private life? What matters is that a nominal celebrity is spouting absurdly simplistic gibberish that borders on threatening the president. Of course he's exaggerating and just blathering whatever comes into his very simple mind, but what's significant is that this sort of over heated childish rhetoric is standard for right-wing hacks everywhere. There are lots of (Koch brothers funded) radio hacks spewing this same sort of inane drivel everyday. And what's truly perverse is that the corporate militarist tools (like Nugent) are in fact the "America Haters" that he decries like a hysterical child.

LTS TRN 2 · Post by **LTS TRN 2** » Mon Apr 23, 2012 5:45 pm

Explain yourself, P-willie. Nugent is a hysterical spouter of simplistic drivel. He's not even worth responding to, and i only mention him as being typical of the simplistic Tea Bagger mentality. Okay? Try to keep up.

Moving Sale · Post by **Moving Sale** » Mon Apr 23, 2012 6:23 pm

Derron wrote: freedom of speech?

You have no idea what 'freedom of speech' even is do you?

Derron · Post by **Derron** » Mon Apr 23, 2012 6:34 pm

Moving Sale wrote:
Derron wrote: freedom of speech?
You have no idea what 'freedom of speech' even is do you?

Unfortunately it means we have to continue to read the shit ass drivel you post here and try to pass off as a take on anything. Painful really...

LTS TRN 2 · Post by **LTS TRN 2** » Mon Apr 23, 2012 6:35 pm

Well, I've made about three, and nothing too detailed. I don't like his music and his politics, as I've pointed out, are typical of the GOP mouth breathers these days. What's your point again? You keep not saying it.

Sirfindafold · Post by **Sirfindafold** » Mon Apr 23, 2012 6:36 pm

Hypocritical Libs are just pissed that Nugent called out their hero years ago.....

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o4hI5utjenc

Derron · Post by **Derron** » Mon Apr 23, 2012 6:37 pm

LTS TRN 2 wrote:Well, I've made about three, and nothing too detailed. I don't like his music and his politics, as I've pointed out, are typical of the GOP mouth breathers these days. What's your point again? You keep not saying it.

Since you don't like his music or politics, but you keep spouting off about , I think his point may be shut the fuck up. Maybe...

Moving Sale · Post by **Moving Sale** » Mon Apr 23, 2012 6:48 pm

Derron wrote:Unfortunately it means we have to continue to read the shit ass drivel you post here and try to pass off as a take on anything. Painful really...

But it has nothing to do with TN being kicked off a gig by the Army now does it? So why then did you cite it in your original post?

You don't have to answer that because we all know the answer is that you are a complete tardling.

LTS TRN 2 · Post by **LTS TRN 2** » Mon Apr 23, 2012 6:51 pm

Whose point? I'm the only one actually saying anything. You guys are just sputtering...at me...As usual, you make no sense and i wonder why you're even posting at all.

smackaholic · Post by **smackaholic** » Mon Apr 23, 2012 7:07 pm

Terry in Crapchester wrote:
smackaholic wrote:If Nugent did nail a 17 year old as a 30 year old, he's not a ped. He is a POS, however, IMO.

But, if we are gonna play morality police and go after a 30 year old rock star for banging a 17 year old groupie, what do you say about a 50 year old POTUS banging an early 20s underling? And then lying under oath about it. And we won't even bother going into JFK's wanderings who make Ted and Willy look like choir boys.

And save me the 17 is not 22, because 30 year old rock star is surely not 50 year old POTUS.
To an extent, I agree, but then you go on to . . .

I suspect that all this kiddy diddling being brought up, will cause Nugent's stock to fall in conservative circles, because, that's generally how we roll. Too bad it ain't the case among libs desparate for a hero to hold up.
Was Bill Clinton's conduct appropriate? Certainly not. But was it kiddy diddling? Not by any reasonable definition of that phrase. Like it or not, the law recognizes a 22 year old as a consenting adult.

I never said it was. My point is that The POTUS is held to a MUCH higher standard than a moron who plays a guitar, shrieks, then bangs everything in site after the show.

smackaholic · Post by **smackaholic** » Mon Apr 23, 2012 7:11 pm

Goober McTuber wrote:
smackaholic wrote:If Nugent did nail a 17 year old as a 30 year old, he's not a ped. He is a POS, however, IMO.

I don’t think the 30-year-old nailing the 17-year-old thing is as bad as the multiple inferences that he was screwing girls under the age of 15.

Agreed.

A thirty year old rock and roll dude banging a 17 year old groupie is quite understandable. I seriously doubt that the roadie in charge of grouupie skank requesitioning is checking IDs.

If Ted admitted to banging 14 year olds or there is solid evidence that he did, he should be thrown under the jail.

Goober McTuber · Post by **Goober McTuber** » Mon Apr 23, 2012 7:27 pm

When I was 30 years old, I was tapping an 18-year-old (we lived together for about a year). She was a fairly mature 18, I was a fairly immature 30. She was also drop-dead gorgeous. I was a part-time bartender in the tavern her dad owned. Those were some good times, and her old man was a good shit.

Derron · Post by **Derron** » Mon Apr 23, 2012 7:30 pm

Goober McTuber wrote:When I was 30 years old, I was tapping an 18-year-old (we lived together for about a year). She was a fairly mature 18, I was a fairly immature 30. She was also drop-dead gorgeous. I was a part-time bartender in the tavern her dad owned. Those were some good times, and her old man was a good shit.

Fucking pedophile.

Finally someone comes clean. This makes my 19 years dropping the hammer on a 17 year old about 200 times seem pretty tame.